{"title":"Investigating Stitched Support Techniques for Tapestry Using Digital Image Correlation","authors":"F. Lennard, Rosa Costantini, P. Harrison","doi":"10.1080/00393630.2022.2083414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports on an investigation into stitching techniques used to secure woven tapestry artefacts to fabric supports. A research project used digital image correlation (DIC) as a method of evaluating commonly used tapestry support techniques, with stitching tests carried out on wool rep fabric and a historic tapestry fragment. Though it was necessary to first establish parameters for use, DIC proved very helpful for evaluating the effects of these treatments. It demonstrated that damage leads to high levels of deformation and strain, and that extension and creep are mitigated by stitched support. It was shown that a patch support gives good results if the tapestry is damaged in a discrete area, while a full fabric support provides better overall support for weak areas, even if they are not themselves stitched to the support fabric. In general, it was clear that the closer the stitching, the lower the strain. However, comparing global and local strain showed that very closely spaced stitching constrained the stitched area more than the sample overall. This investigation suggests that it is not necessary to carry out intensive stitching to provide good overall support. DIC could allow us to optimise the amount of stitching necessary for a successful support treatment of a tapestry, though further treatment may be carried out to provide visual compensation for loss. It was concluded that both a full stitched support and a partial stitched support in combination with a fabric-covered vertical mount provide effective reinforcement.","PeriodicalId":21990,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Conservation","volume":"68 1","pages":"558 - 574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2022.2083414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper reports on an investigation into stitching techniques used to secure woven tapestry artefacts to fabric supports. A research project used digital image correlation (DIC) as a method of evaluating commonly used tapestry support techniques, with stitching tests carried out on wool rep fabric and a historic tapestry fragment. Though it was necessary to first establish parameters for use, DIC proved very helpful for evaluating the effects of these treatments. It demonstrated that damage leads to high levels of deformation and strain, and that extension and creep are mitigated by stitched support. It was shown that a patch support gives good results if the tapestry is damaged in a discrete area, while a full fabric support provides better overall support for weak areas, even if they are not themselves stitched to the support fabric. In general, it was clear that the closer the stitching, the lower the strain. However, comparing global and local strain showed that very closely spaced stitching constrained the stitched area more than the sample overall. This investigation suggests that it is not necessary to carry out intensive stitching to provide good overall support. DIC could allow us to optimise the amount of stitching necessary for a successful support treatment of a tapestry, though further treatment may be carried out to provide visual compensation for loss. It was concluded that both a full stitched support and a partial stitched support in combination with a fabric-covered vertical mount provide effective reinforcement.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture.
Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.