Niepotrzebna formalność czy brak zaangażowania – jak postrzegane są motywy par, które nie decydują się na związek małżeński?

Monika Mynarska
{"title":"Niepotrzebna formalność czy brak zaangażowania – jak postrzegane są motywy par, które nie decydują się na związek małżeński?","authors":"Monika Mynarska","doi":"10.33119/sd.2018.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although cohabitation is increasingly common in Poland, it is usually considered a transitional, testing stage that leads to marriage, which constitutes the preferred form of family life in the country. Does it mean that couples who do not choose to marry are perceived as somewhat “worse” than those tying the knot? Using qualitative data from focus group interviews with 69 men and women aged 25–40, I aimed to answer the following questions: What are social perceptions of couples who have already “tested” their relationship, but still live together and refrain from marriage? In particular, what are the motives attributed to such couples and how – if at all – these motives are linked to the quality of the relationships? \nThere were four themes related to such motives identified in the analysed material: (1) the perception of marriage as an unnecessary expense that does not change anything in a relationship, or even makes things worse; (2) fear of an ultimate commitment; (3) uncertainty whether this is the right partner and the resulting low level of commitment in the relationship; (4) rejection of traditional gender roles. Commitment appears central in the analysed discussions suggesting that this concept should constitute an important topic in future studies on unions in Poland.","PeriodicalId":85596,"journal":{"name":"Studia demograficzne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia demograficzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33119/sd.2018.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although cohabitation is increasingly common in Poland, it is usually considered a transitional, testing stage that leads to marriage, which constitutes the preferred form of family life in the country. Does it mean that couples who do not choose to marry are perceived as somewhat “worse” than those tying the knot? Using qualitative data from focus group interviews with 69 men and women aged 25–40, I aimed to answer the following questions: What are social perceptions of couples who have already “tested” their relationship, but still live together and refrain from marriage? In particular, what are the motives attributed to such couples and how – if at all – these motives are linked to the quality of the relationships? There were four themes related to such motives identified in the analysed material: (1) the perception of marriage as an unnecessary expense that does not change anything in a relationship, or even makes things worse; (2) fear of an ultimate commitment; (3) uncertainty whether this is the right partner and the resulting low level of commitment in the relationship; (4) rejection of traditional gender roles. Commitment appears central in the analysed discussions suggesting that this concept should constitute an important topic in future studies on unions in Poland.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不必要的拘谨或缺乏承诺——不决定结婚的夫妇的动机是如何被感知的?
虽然同居在波兰越来越普遍,但它通常被认为是一个过渡阶段,是通往婚姻的考验阶段,而婚姻是波兰家庭生活的首选形式。这是否意味着不选择结婚的情侣会被认为比那些结婚的情侣更“糟糕”?通过对69名年龄在25-40岁之间的男性和女性的焦点小组访谈的定性数据,我旨在回答以下问题:社会对那些已经“考验”了他们的关系,但仍然住在一起并避免结婚的夫妇有什么看法?特别是,这些夫妻的动机是什么,如果有的话,这些动机是如何与关系的质量联系在一起的?在分析的材料中,有四个与这种动机相关的主题:(1)认为婚姻是一种不必要的支出,不会改变关系中的任何东西,甚至会使事情变得更糟;(2)对最终承诺的恐惧;(3)不确定这是否是合适的伴侣,从而导致关系中的低承诺水平;(4)对传统性别角色的排斥。在分析的讨论中,承诺是中心,这表明这一概念应成为今后关于波兰工会的研究的一个重要题目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Informal care for adults: a comparison of Time Use Surveys of 2004 and 2013 Wykorzystanie teorii klas społecznych do analizy zachowań i postaw związanych z prokreacją i rolami płci Wydatki publiczne na świadczenia rzeczowe opieki długoterminowej w Polsce – konwergencja czy dywergencja na poziomie województw “Family 500+” programme as a social investment aimed at increasing the number of births in Poland – an analysis of Internet forums discourse Imigranci po 60. roku życia – przypadek Polski
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1