Thermodynamic Basis of Brine Density on Pressure, Temperature, and Chemical Composition in Ultrahigh Pressure/High Temperature Environments

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Drilling & Completion Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.2118/199563-pa
S. Rahman, U. B. Sathuvalli, P. Suryanarayana
{"title":"Thermodynamic Basis of Brine Density on Pressure, Temperature, and Chemical Composition in Ultrahigh Pressure/High Temperature Environments","authors":"S. Rahman, U. B. Sathuvalli, P. Suryanarayana","doi":"10.2118/199563-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Temperature change and the pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) response of wellbore annular fluids are the primary variables that control annular pressure buildup in offshore wells. Though the physics of annular pressure buildup is well understood, there is some ambiguity in the PVT models of brines. While custom tests can be performed to determine the PVT response of brines, they are time-consuming and expensive. In this light, our paper presents a method to determine the density of brines from their chemical composition, as a function of pressure and temperature. It compares theoretical predictions with the results of tests on brines used in our industry and available test data from the oil and gas and other industries.\n In 1987, Kemp and Thomas used the principles of chemical thermodynamics to develop equations for the density of brines as a function of pressure and temperature and their electrolytic actions. However, their paper contained two (inadvertent, and probably typographical) errors. One of the errors lay in the set of the Debye-Hückel parameters, and the other was contained in the coefficients of the series expansion for the infinite dilution molal volume. Furthermore, they (inadvertently) did not mention the role of a crucial parameter that accounts for the interaction between the ionic constituents of the salt. As a result, nearly a generation of engineers in our industry has been unable to reproduce their valuable results or apply their technically rigorous results to other brine chemistries.\n In this paper, we return to the basic equations of chemical thermodynamics and the principles of stoichiometry and delineate the inadvertent errors that had crept into the Kemp and Thomas equations. We then present the rectified equations and reproduce their example with the corrected results. Further, we compare the predictions from the original Kemp and Thomas work with results from a leading chemical engineering model. Finally, we compare the results of theoretical models with test measurements from the laboratory and characterize the uncertainty inherent in each model. Thereby, we have rendered the Kemp and Thomas (1987) model useful to the well design community.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/199563-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Temperature change and the pressure/volume/temperature (PVT) response of wellbore annular fluids are the primary variables that control annular pressure buildup in offshore wells. Though the physics of annular pressure buildup is well understood, there is some ambiguity in the PVT models of brines. While custom tests can be performed to determine the PVT response of brines, they are time-consuming and expensive. In this light, our paper presents a method to determine the density of brines from their chemical composition, as a function of pressure and temperature. It compares theoretical predictions with the results of tests on brines used in our industry and available test data from the oil and gas and other industries. In 1987, Kemp and Thomas used the principles of chemical thermodynamics to develop equations for the density of brines as a function of pressure and temperature and their electrolytic actions. However, their paper contained two (inadvertent, and probably typographical) errors. One of the errors lay in the set of the Debye-Hückel parameters, and the other was contained in the coefficients of the series expansion for the infinite dilution molal volume. Furthermore, they (inadvertently) did not mention the role of a crucial parameter that accounts for the interaction between the ionic constituents of the salt. As a result, nearly a generation of engineers in our industry has been unable to reproduce their valuable results or apply their technically rigorous results to other brine chemistries. In this paper, we return to the basic equations of chemical thermodynamics and the principles of stoichiometry and delineate the inadvertent errors that had crept into the Kemp and Thomas equations. We then present the rectified equations and reproduce their example with the corrected results. Further, we compare the predictions from the original Kemp and Thomas work with results from a leading chemical engineering model. Finally, we compare the results of theoretical models with test measurements from the laboratory and characterize the uncertainty inherent in each model. Thereby, we have rendered the Kemp and Thomas (1987) model useful to the well design community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超高压/高温环境下盐水密度的压力、温度和化学成分热力学基础
井筒环空流体的温度变化和压力/体积/温度(PVT)响应是控制海上油井环空压力形成的主要变量。虽然环空压力积累的物理原理已经被很好地理解了,但是在盐水的PVT模型中仍然存在一些不明确的地方。虽然可以执行定制测试来确定盐水的PVT响应,但它们既耗时又昂贵。在这种情况下,我们的论文提出了一种方法,以确定其化学成分的密度,作为压力和温度的函数。它将理论预测与我们行业中使用的盐水测试结果以及石油、天然气和其他行业的现有测试数据进行比较。1987年,肯普和托马斯利用化学热力学原理,建立了盐水密度随压力、温度及其电解作用的函数方程。然而,他们的论文中有两个(可能是无意的,可能是排版上的)错误。其中一个误差存在于debye - h ckel参数集合中,另一个误差存在于无限稀释摩尔体积的级数展开系数中。此外,他们(无意中)没有提到一个关键参数的作用,这个参数解释了盐的离子成分之间的相互作用。因此,我们行业的近一代工程师无法重现他们有价值的结果,也无法将他们严格的技术结果应用于其他卤水化学。在本文中,我们回到化学热力学的基本方程和化学计量学的原理,并描述了无意中潜入肯普和托马斯方程的错误。然后,我们给出了修正后的方程,并用修正后的结果再现了它们的例子。此外,我们将Kemp和Thomas最初的预测与一个领先的化学工程模型的结果进行了比较。最后,我们将理论模型的结果与实验室的测试测量结果进行了比较,并描述了每个模型中固有的不确定性。因此,我们使Kemp和Thomas(1987)模型对井设计社区有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
期刊最新文献
Combining Magnetic and Gyroscopic Surveys Provides the Best Possible Accuracy Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells Experimental Investigation of Geopolymers for Application in High-Temperature and Geothermal Well Cementing Analysis of Riser Gas Pressure from Full-Scale Gas-in-Riser Experiments with Instrumentation Correlating Surface and Downhole Perforation Entry Hole Measurements Leads to Development of Improved Perforating Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1