Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse

IF 0.2 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Topics in Linguistics Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2478/topling-2020-0007
E. Prażmo
{"title":"Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse","authors":"E. Prażmo","doi":"10.2478/topling-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the article is to examine the language used by an emerging online community known as incels. Incels are “involuntarily celibate” men who gather online to share their frustration and resentment. They blame their predicament on their alleged ugliness, as well as on the structure of modern Western society in general, and women’s behaviour in particular. Hate speech and violent language flourish on incel online forums to such an extent that most of their websites are taken down, one by one, due to breaches of rules around violent content. In the present article I aim to analyze the language used by incels, focusing on the dehumanizing metaphors used in order to describe women, who are the main target of incels’ hatred. This paper was realized within the theoretical framework of cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis with special emphasis on conceptual metaphor theory.","PeriodicalId":41377,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the article is to examine the language used by an emerging online community known as incels. Incels are “involuntarily celibate” men who gather online to share their frustration and resentment. They blame their predicament on their alleged ugliness, as well as on the structure of modern Western society in general, and women’s behaviour in particular. Hate speech and violent language flourish on incel online forums to such an extent that most of their websites are taken down, one by one, due to breaches of rules around violent content. In the present article I aim to analyze the language used by incels, focusing on the dehumanizing metaphors used in order to describe women, who are the main target of incels’ hatred. This paper was realized within the theoretical framework of cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis with special emphasis on conceptual metaphor theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
狐狸比动物更坏。网络话语中非人性化隐喻的认知语言学分析
摘要本文的目的是研究新兴的在线社区incels所使用的语言。Incels是指“非自愿地独身”的男性,他们聚集在网上分享自己的沮丧和怨恨。她们将自己的困境归咎于所谓的丑陋,以及现代西方社会的总体结构,尤其是女性的行为。仇恨言论和暴力语言在互联网论坛上蓬勃发展,以至于他们的大多数网站都被一个接一个地关闭,因为违反了有关暴力内容的规定。在本文中,我旨在分析incels使用的语言,重点是为了描述女性而使用的非人性化的隐喻,女性是incels仇恨的主要目标。本文是在认知语言学和批评语篇分析的理论框架下进行的,特别强调概念隐喻理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Linguistics
Topics in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The semantic complexity of Hausa kinship terms The mental consideration of resilience as a relevant social concept (a corpus-based research of American English) Austin in the Lab: Empirically reconsidering the constative-performative distinction The ADV speaking-construction in American English: A quantitative corpus-based investigation The morphological and syntactic functions of Dagbani nominal suffixes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1