Planning laws and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ rights and interests

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences Australian Planner Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07293682.2023.2216318
Ed Wensing
{"title":"Planning laws and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ rights and interests","authors":"Ed Wensing","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2023.2216318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Contemporary Australian planning has for too long ignored its fundamental responsibilities in its relations with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in urban and regional Australia. Australian land-use planning and development processes do not have a good track record of taking account of the rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, or of adequately involving them, especially in our capital cities and major regional centres where the larger proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples live and the where the extent of dispossession is perhaps at its greatest. It is a sad indictment of our planning system that more than 30 years after the High Court of Australia’s landmark decision in Mabo (No. 2), that most of the planning statutes around Australia still do not require prior consultation with or the direct involvement of registered native title holders or claimants during plan formulation or decision-making about land uses for an area of land or waters. This paper examines the current state of affairs with respect to how well or otherwise our planning statutes still fail to give adequate recognition to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ rights and interests in contemporary statutory planning processes.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"59 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2216318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contemporary Australian planning has for too long ignored its fundamental responsibilities in its relations with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in urban and regional Australia. Australian land-use planning and development processes do not have a good track record of taking account of the rights and interests of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, or of adequately involving them, especially in our capital cities and major regional centres where the larger proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples live and the where the extent of dispossession is perhaps at its greatest. It is a sad indictment of our planning system that more than 30 years after the High Court of Australia’s landmark decision in Mabo (No. 2), that most of the planning statutes around Australia still do not require prior consultation with or the direct involvement of registered native title holders or claimants during plan formulation or decision-making about land uses for an area of land or waters. This paper examines the current state of affairs with respect to how well or otherwise our planning statutes still fail to give adequate recognition to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples’ rights and interests in contemporary statutory planning processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规划法与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的权利和利益
长期以来,当代澳大利亚的规划忽视了其与澳大利亚城市和地区土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的关系的基本责任。澳大利亚土地使用规划和发展进程在考虑到土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的权利和利益,或使他们充分参与方面没有良好的记录,特别是在我们的首都城市和主要区域中心,那里居住着较大比例的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民,那里的剥夺程度可能是最大的。在澳大利亚高等法院对马博(Mabo)一案作出具有里程碑意义的裁决(第2号)30多年后,澳大利亚各地的大多数规划法规仍然不要求在规划制定或决定土地或水域的土地使用时事先咨询或直接参与注册的土著所有权持有人或索赔人,这是对我们规划制度的可悲控诉。本文考察了目前的情况,即我们的规划法规在当代法定规划过程中仍然未能充分承认土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的权利和利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the music industries of Brisbane and an evaluation of the policy response Planning for open space and recreation in new high density areas: a reply to Marriott Practice reflections on the pandemic from South East Queensland Planning with foresight and resilience: the Planning Institute of Australia National Congress in Adelaide 2023 How have South Australian urban planning policies affected Blakeview’s surface temperatures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1