Interaction rituals and technology: A review essay

IF 2 2区 社会学 0 LITERATURE Poetics Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101765
Lars E.F. Johannessen
{"title":"Interaction rituals and technology: A review essay","authors":"Lars E.F. Johannessen","doi":"10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article aims to advance research on interaction rituals (IR) and technology. Its starting point is interaction ritual theory, a key micro-sociological approach that postulates IRs as the micro-interactional glue that holds social life together. This approach sees IRs as requiring bodily co-presence among interactants, thus casting doubt over the ritual potential of technology-mediated interaction. In recent years, however, studies have begun problematizing this view through investigations of technology-mediated IRs (TMIR). Counter to IR theory, these studies show that IRs can take place in lieu of bodily copresence and that technologies offer new opportunities for and create distinctively novel forms of rituals and communities. Crucially, however, this emerging literature has an under-theorized understanding of user-technology relationships, which leaves significant gaps in our understanding of IRs and technology. To advance the field, it is suggested that future research should consider: a broader ecology of technologies; heterogeneous users, uses, and circumstances; cultural coding and domestication; and the technologies of face-to-face interaction. This can facilitate a more fundamental reappraisal of the relationship between IRs and technology, which, in turn, can improve our understanding of both TMIR and IR more generally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47900,"journal":{"name":"Poetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poetics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to advance research on interaction rituals (IR) and technology. Its starting point is interaction ritual theory, a key micro-sociological approach that postulates IRs as the micro-interactional glue that holds social life together. This approach sees IRs as requiring bodily co-presence among interactants, thus casting doubt over the ritual potential of technology-mediated interaction. In recent years, however, studies have begun problematizing this view through investigations of technology-mediated IRs (TMIR). Counter to IR theory, these studies show that IRs can take place in lieu of bodily copresence and that technologies offer new opportunities for and create distinctively novel forms of rituals and communities. Crucially, however, this emerging literature has an under-theorized understanding of user-technology relationships, which leaves significant gaps in our understanding of IRs and technology. To advance the field, it is suggested that future research should consider: a broader ecology of technologies; heterogeneous users, uses, and circumstances; cultural coding and domestication; and the technologies of face-to-face interaction. This can facilitate a more fundamental reappraisal of the relationship between IRs and technology, which, in turn, can improve our understanding of both TMIR and IR more generally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交互仪式和技术:一篇评论文章
本文旨在推动互动仪式(IR)与技术的研究。它的出发点是互动仪式理论,这是一种关键的微观社会学方法,它假设ir是将社会生活结合在一起的微观互动粘合剂。这种方法认为,互动需要互动者之间的身体共同存在,因此对技术介导的互动的仪式潜力产生了怀疑。然而,近年来,通过对技术介导的IRs (TMIR)的调查,研究开始对这一观点提出质疑。与IR理论相反,这些研究表明,IR可以代替身体的存在,技术为仪式和社区提供了新的机会,并创造了独特的新形式。然而,至关重要的是,这些新兴文献对用户-技术关系的理解缺乏理论化,这给我们对ir和技术的理解留下了重大空白。为了推动这一领域的发展,建议未来的研究应考虑:更广泛的技术生态;异构用户、用途和情况;文化编码与归化;以及面对面交流的技术。这有助于对红外光谱和技术之间的关系进行更根本的重新评估,这反过来又可以提高我们对红外光谱和红外光谱的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Poetics
Poetics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Poetics is an interdisciplinary journal of theoretical and empirical research on culture, the media and the arts. Particularly welcome are papers that make an original contribution to the major disciplines - sociology, psychology, media and communication studies, and economics - within which promising lines of research on culture, media and the arts have been developed.
期刊最新文献
Digital media revolution and stratificational inertia: A historical study of media usage and sociopolitical stratification in the age of social media Hidden patterns of inequality: The heterogeneity in parenting within educational groups Sustainable creative careers through mentoring: Understanding social resilience in the art field Editorial Board A taxonomy of artists’ postures to grasp the plurality of cultural production practices: Putting an end to the cicada and the ant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1