A Tecnologia da Informação (TI) a serviço da gestão pública: vantagens da utilização da Videoconferência em audiências penais

Rodrigo Zanetti Negrini, Daniel Luís Arenhardt, Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, Cristiano Lanza Savegnago
{"title":"A Tecnologia da Informação (TI) a serviço da gestão pública: vantagens da utilização da Videoconferência em audiências penais","authors":"Rodrigo Zanetti Negrini, Daniel Luís Arenhardt, Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, Cristiano Lanza Savegnago","doi":"10.22279/NAVUS.2020.V10.P01-16.1069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the use of Video Hearing, Teleconference, or Videoconference equipment in the Brazilian criminal proceedings. It discusses its legality and identifies advantages of its application over the conventional model of criminal hearings. For this purpose, a bibliographic review was performed, where it was possible to verify its legal, constitutional and financial viability. Considering that its use complies with the constitutional principles of legal defense and contradictory, the benefits of its use for the legal system become undeniable, as it allows for the reduction of costs of the public entity and for the increase of the security standards of the judiciary's servers and for the public security. The advantages identified in the literature are in agreement with this finding (safety of those involved, speed and economy), demonstrating the gains from its application. Contrary to existing criticism, holding videoconference hearings preserves the individual rights and the guarantees declared by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil to convicts or defendants - since they are guaranteed the right to conduct an early and reserved interview with their advocate, thus ensuring confidentiality between lawyer and client.","PeriodicalId":41767,"journal":{"name":"Navus-Revista de Gestao e Tecnologia","volume":"10 1","pages":"01-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Navus-Revista de Gestao e Tecnologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22279/NAVUS.2020.V10.P01-16.1069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of Video Hearing, Teleconference, or Videoconference equipment in the Brazilian criminal proceedings. It discusses its legality and identifies advantages of its application over the conventional model of criminal hearings. For this purpose, a bibliographic review was performed, where it was possible to verify its legal, constitutional and financial viability. Considering that its use complies with the constitutional principles of legal defense and contradictory, the benefits of its use for the legal system become undeniable, as it allows for the reduction of costs of the public entity and for the increase of the security standards of the judiciary's servers and for the public security. The advantages identified in the literature are in agreement with this finding (safety of those involved, speed and economy), demonstrating the gains from its application. Contrary to existing criticism, holding videoconference hearings preserves the individual rights and the guarantees declared by the Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil to convicts or defendants - since they are guaranteed the right to conduct an early and reserved interview with their advocate, thus ensuring confidentiality between lawyer and client.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为公共管理服务的信息技术:在刑事听证会中使用视频会议的优势
本文讨论了视频听证、电话会议或视频会议设备在巴西刑事诉讼中的使用。论述了其合法性,并指出其相对于传统刑事听证模式的优越性。为此目的,进行了书目审查,在可能的情况下核查其法律、宪法和财政可行性。考虑到它的使用符合法律辩护的宪法原则和矛盾,它的使用对法律制度的好处是不可否认的,因为它可以减少公共实体的成本,提高司法机构服务器的安全标准和公共安全。文献中确定的优势与这一发现一致(涉及人员的安全性,速度和经济性),证明了其应用的收益。与现有的批评相反,举行视像会议听证会维护了个人权利和《巴西联邦共和国宪法》对罪犯或被告所宣布的保障,因为他们被保证有权及早和保留地与辩护人进行面谈,从而确保律师和委托人之间的保密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between Human Resource Management practices and Collective Competencies: a case study in a certified B company The Contribution of Appearance to Women in the Labor Market Ferramentas tecnológicas como suporte ao compartilhamento de informações e conhecimento: um estudo de caso em uma instituição federal de ensino durante a pandemia de Covid-19 Organizações 4.0: tendências de empregabilidade para as mulheres negras brasileiras Fatores Determinantes da Estrutura de Capital das Empresas Brasileiras: Evidências do Setor de Utilidade Pública
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1