Beyond financialisation: the longue durée of finance and production in the Global South

IF 2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Cambridge Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1093/cje/beac029
Kai Koddenbrock, I. Kvangraven, N. Sylla
{"title":"Beyond financialisation: the longue durée of finance and production in the Global South","authors":"Kai Koddenbrock, I. Kvangraven, N. Sylla","doi":"10.1093/cje/beac029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the central premises of the literature on financialisation is that we have been living in a new era of capitalism, characterised by a historical shift in the finance-production nexus. Finance has expanded to a disproportionate economic size and, more importantly, has divorced from productive economic pursuits. In this paper, we explore these claims of ‘expansion’ and ‘divorce’ based on a longue durée analysis of the link between finance and production in Senegal and Ghana. As such, we de-centre the dominant approach to financialisation. Seen from the South, we argue that although there has been expansion of financial motives and practices the ‘divorce’ between the financial and the productive economy cannot be considered a new empirical phenomenon having occurred during the last decades and even less an epochal shift of the capitalist system. The tendency for finance to neglect the needs of the domestic productive sector has been the structural operation of finance in many parts of the Global South over the last 150 years. Therefore, one cannot put forward a theory of the evolution of finance under capitalism without taking these crucial historical insights into account.","PeriodicalId":48156,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beac029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

One of the central premises of the literature on financialisation is that we have been living in a new era of capitalism, characterised by a historical shift in the finance-production nexus. Finance has expanded to a disproportionate economic size and, more importantly, has divorced from productive economic pursuits. In this paper, we explore these claims of ‘expansion’ and ‘divorce’ based on a longue durée analysis of the link between finance and production in Senegal and Ghana. As such, we de-centre the dominant approach to financialisation. Seen from the South, we argue that although there has been expansion of financial motives and practices the ‘divorce’ between the financial and the productive economy cannot be considered a new empirical phenomenon having occurred during the last decades and even less an epochal shift of the capitalist system. The tendency for finance to neglect the needs of the domestic productive sector has been the structural operation of finance in many parts of the Global South over the last 150 years. Therefore, one cannot put forward a theory of the evolution of finance under capitalism without taking these crucial historical insights into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融化之外:全球南方国家金融和生产的长期停滞
金融化文献的中心前提之一是,我们一直生活在资本主义的新时代,其特征是金融与生产关系的历史性转变。金融已经扩张到一个不成比例的经济规模,更重要的是,它已经脱离了生产性的经济追求。在本文中,我们基于对塞内加尔和加纳金融与生产之间联系的长期研究分析,探讨了这些“扩张”和“离婚”的说法。因此,我们去中心化了金融化的主要途径。从南方来看,我们认为,尽管金融动机和实践有所扩大,但金融和生产经济之间的“离婚”不能被视为过去几十年发生的一种新的经验现象,更不能被视为资本主义制度的划时代转变。过去150年来,金融忽视国内生产部门需求的趋势一直是全球南方许多地区的结构性金融运作。因此,如果不考虑这些关键的历史见解,就不能提出资本主义下金融演变的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Cambridge Journal of Economics, founded in 1977 in the traditions of Marx, Keynes, Kalecki, Joan Robinson and Kaldor, provides a forum for theoretical, applied, policy and methodological research into social and economic issues. Its focus includes: •the organisation of social production and the distribution of its product •the causes and consequences of gender, ethnic, class and national inequities •inflation and unemployment •the changing forms and boundaries of markets and planning •uneven development and world market instability •globalisation and international integration.
期刊最新文献
Economic growth and the foreign sector: Peru 1821–2020 Asymmetrical, symmetrical and artifactual man: group size and cooperation in James Buchanan’s constitutional economics Polyarchy and societas: an extended continuum of discrete structural alternatives What politics does to the economic analysis of the employment relationship: a critical perspective on personnel economics Truth or coherence? How Adam Smith used philosophical sources to explain how paradigms change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1