Perceptions of Women With Comorbid PTSD and Substance Use Disorder on Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Interventions

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.05.003
Vanessa C. Somohano, Alicia E. Vasquez, Taylor Shank, Makenzie Irrgang, Aurora G. Newman, Cameron Evans, Jessica J. Wyse, Lauren Denneson, Maya O'Neil, Travis Lovejoy
{"title":"Perceptions of Women With Comorbid PTSD and Substance Use Disorder on Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Interventions","authors":"Vanessa C. Somohano,&nbsp;Alicia E. Vasquez,&nbsp;Taylor Shank,&nbsp;Makenzie Irrgang,&nbsp;Aurora G. Newman,&nbsp;Cameron Evans,&nbsp;Jessica J. Wyse,&nbsp;Lauren Denneson,&nbsp;Maya O'Neil,&nbsp;Travis Lovejoy","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Women with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrate the greatest psychiatric severity when entering mental health treatment, and poorest rates of treatment completion and relapse compared to those with either disorder alone. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for women with comorbid PTSD–SUD may be an effective treatment approach as it targets mechanisms underlying self-medication of trauma-related symptoms via substance use. Little is known, however, of the benefits of MBIs for this population. Thus, the purpose of this study was to qualitatively elucidate mechanisms of action in a pilot MBI adapted for women with comorbid SUD and PTSD, with the goal of identifying the most salient aspects of MBIs that target self-medication of PTSD symptoms via substance use. Following completion of a trauma-integrated MBI, women (<em>N</em> = 39) diagnosed with PTSD–SUD were invited to attend one of ten, 60-minute, audio-recorded focus groups. A semistructured interview protocol was utilized to investigate how participants perceived the utility of MBIs in mitigating PTSD and SUD symptoms over the course of the intervention. Conventional content analysis guided qualitative analysis and reporting. Participants described four mechanisms through which they experienced MBIs attenuating the relationship between PTSD and SUD: increased attention to trauma- and substance-related triggers occurring in the present moment; greater cultivation of nonjudgmental acceptance to aversive experiences; development of self-compassionate attitudes toward suffering; and increased tolerance to aversive experiences. Building upon these mechanisms of action, we propose a moderated mediation model, in which increased present-moment awareness, nonjudgmental attitudes toward distress, and self-compassion reduce impulsivity and negative affect, which then increases tolerance for aversive experiences, thereby attenuating the relationship between PTSD and SUD symptoms. Interventions targeting the four proposed mechanisms may be considered when treating women diagnosed with comorbid PTSD–SUD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51511,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1077722922001055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) demonstrate the greatest psychiatric severity when entering mental health treatment, and poorest rates of treatment completion and relapse compared to those with either disorder alone. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for women with comorbid PTSD–SUD may be an effective treatment approach as it targets mechanisms underlying self-medication of trauma-related symptoms via substance use. Little is known, however, of the benefits of MBIs for this population. Thus, the purpose of this study was to qualitatively elucidate mechanisms of action in a pilot MBI adapted for women with comorbid SUD and PTSD, with the goal of identifying the most salient aspects of MBIs that target self-medication of PTSD symptoms via substance use. Following completion of a trauma-integrated MBI, women (N = 39) diagnosed with PTSD–SUD were invited to attend one of ten, 60-minute, audio-recorded focus groups. A semistructured interview protocol was utilized to investigate how participants perceived the utility of MBIs in mitigating PTSD and SUD symptoms over the course of the intervention. Conventional content analysis guided qualitative analysis and reporting. Participants described four mechanisms through which they experienced MBIs attenuating the relationship between PTSD and SUD: increased attention to trauma- and substance-related triggers occurring in the present moment; greater cultivation of nonjudgmental acceptance to aversive experiences; development of self-compassionate attitudes toward suffering; and increased tolerance to aversive experiences. Building upon these mechanisms of action, we propose a moderated mediation model, in which increased present-moment awareness, nonjudgmental attitudes toward distress, and self-compassion reduce impulsivity and negative affect, which then increases tolerance for aversive experiences, thereby attenuating the relationship between PTSD and SUD symptoms. Interventions targeting the four proposed mechanisms may be considered when treating women diagnosed with comorbid PTSD–SUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍的女性对基于正念的干预机制的认知
与单纯患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和药物使用障碍(SUD)的女性相比,患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和药物使用障碍(SUD)的女性在接受心理健康治疗时精神状况最为严重,治疗完成率和复发率也最低。对患有创伤后应激障碍和药物滥用障碍的妇女进行正念干预(MBIs)可能是一种有效的治疗方法,因为它针对的是通过药物滥用自我治疗创伤相关症状的潜在机制。然而,人们对 MBIs 对这一人群的益处知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是定性地阐释针对合并 SUD 和创伤后应激障碍女性的试点 MBI 的作用机制,旨在确定 MBI 中针对通过药物使用自我治疗创伤后应激障碍症状的最突出方面。在完成创伤整合 MBI 后,被诊断患有创伤后应激障碍-SUD 的女性(39 人)被邀请参加 10 个 60 分钟录音焦点小组中的一个。该小组采用半结构式访谈协议,调查参与者在干预过程中如何看待 MBI 在减轻创伤后应激障碍和 SUD 症状方面的作用。常规内容分析指导定性分析和报告。参与者描述了他们通过 MBI 减轻创伤后应激障碍和 SUD 之间关系的四种机制:增加对当下发生的创伤和药物相关触发因素的关注;更多地培养对厌恶体验的非评判性接受;发展对痛苦的自我同情态度;以及增加对厌恶体验的容忍度。在这些作用机制的基础上,我们提出了一个调节中介模型,即增强当下意识、对痛苦的非批判性态度和自我同情会减少冲动和负面情绪,进而增加对厌恶体验的容忍度,从而减轻创伤后应激障碍和 SUD 症状之间的关系。在治疗合并创伤后应激障碍和自闭症的女性时,可以考虑针对上述四种机制进行干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills to Clinical Domains Implicated in Contemporary Addiction Research: A Conceptual Synthesis and Promise for Precision Medicine TEAM-CBT for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Testing Short-Term Impact and Within-Session Change Narrative Exposure Therapy for a Traumatic Birth Experience With the Non-Birthing Parent: A Single Case Study Disorders in Disguise: Proposed Clinical Competencies in Eating Disorders for All Child and Adolescent Mental Health Providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1