Massification and its Critique in the Nineteenth Century History of Ideas: József Eötvös on Popular Meanings and Public Life

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE Belphegor Pub Date : 2020-01-11 DOI:10.4000/belphegor.2312
H. Vincze
{"title":"Massification and its Critique in the Nineteenth Century History of Ideas: József Eötvös on Popular Meanings and Public Life","authors":"H. Vincze","doi":"10.4000/belphegor.2312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing after the failure of the 1848 Hungarian revolution, Jozsef Eotvos, himself a prominent politician and novelist, grappled with the sources of the failure and conditions of success of social and political reforms. In his monumental work, The Dominant Ideas of the Nineteenth Century and their Impact on the State, he proposed that in order to understand the behaviour of the masses and design social and political reforms that will have popular support, one needed to understand the meanings people assigned to popular ideas—as opposed to meanings assigned to them by theorists. Popularity, in this approach, had three components: ideas around which people rallied, emotions that connected them to these ideas, and actions people undertook in their name. The way towards understanding these components was to understand the culture of the people in its various manifestations, from popular religiosity to literary and material culture. By re-reading Eotvos’s work focusing on his conception of popular ideas, this paper investigates how the longstanding tension between popularity and the distrust in populism was articulated in a classic of nineteenth century central European political thought.","PeriodicalId":53776,"journal":{"name":"Belphegor","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belphegor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/belphegor.2312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing after the failure of the 1848 Hungarian revolution, Jozsef Eotvos, himself a prominent politician and novelist, grappled with the sources of the failure and conditions of success of social and political reforms. In his monumental work, The Dominant Ideas of the Nineteenth Century and their Impact on the State, he proposed that in order to understand the behaviour of the masses and design social and political reforms that will have popular support, one needed to understand the meanings people assigned to popular ideas—as opposed to meanings assigned to them by theorists. Popularity, in this approach, had three components: ideas around which people rallied, emotions that connected them to these ideas, and actions people undertook in their name. The way towards understanding these components was to understand the culture of the people in its various manifestations, from popular religiosity to literary and material culture. By re-reading Eotvos’s work focusing on his conception of popular ideas, this paper investigates how the longstanding tension between popularity and the distrust in populism was articulated in a classic of nineteenth century central European political thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪思想史上的大众化及其批判:József Eötvös关于大众意义与公共生活
1848年匈牙利革命失败后,Jozsef Eotvos本人是一位著名的政治家和小说家,他在写作中探讨了社会和政治改革失败的根源和成功的条件。在他的不朽著作《19世纪的主导思想及其对国家的影响》中,他提出,为了理解群众的行为,并设计得到民众支持的社会和政治改革,人们需要理解人们赋予流行思想的含义,而不是理论家赋予它们的含义。在这种方法中,流行性有三个组成部分:人们团结在一起的想法,将他们与这些想法联系起来的情感,以及人们以自己的名义采取的行动。理解这些组成部分的方法是理解人民文化的各种表现形式,从流行的宗教信仰到文学和物质文化。通过重读Eotvos的作品,重点是他对流行思想的概念,本文探讨了流行与民粹主义的不信任之间的长期紧张关系是如何在19世纪中欧政治思想的经典中表达出来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Belphegor
Belphegor LITERATURE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Des temps difficiles : usages de la temporalité dans le récit dystopique Fiction d’anticipation et sensationnalisme de la crise dans l’entre-deux-guerres1 Le présent comme passé du futur : le régime cognitif complexe des voyages dans le temps des récits d’anticipation Un genre encore fécond ? Devenirs de l’anticipation en France États du futurisme dans l’anticipation et la science-fiction (et leurs fins du monde)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1