End-of-Life Decision-Making for Severely Ill Newborns

I. Chatziioannidis, E. Gkiougki, A. Pouliakis, Z. Iliodromiti, R. Sokou, Takis Vidalis, T. Boutsikou, T. Xanthos, N. Iacovidou
{"title":"End-of-Life Decision-Making for Severely Ill Newborns","authors":"I. Chatziioannidis, E. Gkiougki, A. Pouliakis, Z. Iliodromiti, R. Sokou, Takis Vidalis, T. Boutsikou, T. Xanthos, N. Iacovidou","doi":"10.4018/IJRQEH.2020100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in neonatology enabled significant improvements in neonatal survival, often at the expense of long-term morbidity. End-of-life decisions concern neonatal patients with fatal congenital anomalies, severe neurological deficits, and extreme prematurity at the limits of viability, presenting a complex issue for both healthcare professionals and parents. Since newborns cannot express their wishes or claim their rights, physicians and parents carry the responsibility to decide in their best interests, considering their future quality of life. Harmonization of scientific progress and legislation defining clear rules is necessary so neonatologists can proceed to such agonizing decisions. Greece lacks both specific legislation regarding such decisions and medical training on handling respective ethical dilemmas. Thus, guidelines improving such decisions are closely related to the quality of the healthcare system and should be established along with the legal system's adaptation.","PeriodicalId":36298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRQEH.2020100103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in neonatology enabled significant improvements in neonatal survival, often at the expense of long-term morbidity. End-of-life decisions concern neonatal patients with fatal congenital anomalies, severe neurological deficits, and extreme prematurity at the limits of viability, presenting a complex issue for both healthcare professionals and parents. Since newborns cannot express their wishes or claim their rights, physicians and parents carry the responsibility to decide in their best interests, considering their future quality of life. Harmonization of scientific progress and legislation defining clear rules is necessary so neonatologists can proceed to such agonizing decisions. Greece lacks both specific legislation regarding such decisions and medical training on handling respective ethical dilemmas. Thus, guidelines improving such decisions are closely related to the quality of the healthcare system and should be established along with the legal system's adaptation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重新生儿的临终决策
新生儿科学的进步使新生儿存活率显著提高,但往往以长期发病率为代价。临终决定涉及患有致命先天性畸形、严重神经系统缺陷和极度早产的新生儿患者,这对医疗专业人员和父母来说都是一个复杂的问题。由于新生儿不能表达自己的意愿或主张自己的权利,医生和父母有责任考虑到他们未来的生活质量,为他们的最大利益做出决定。为了让新生儿学家能够做出如此痛苦的决定,科学进步和制定明确规则的立法之间的协调是必要的。希腊既缺乏关于此类决定的具体立法,也缺乏处理各自道德困境的医疗培训。因此,改进此类决策的指导方针与医疗保健系统的质量密切相关,应随着法律系统的调整而制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Probabilistic Model of Patient Classification Using Bayesian Model A New Classification Model Based on Transfer Learning of DCNN and Stacknet for Fast Classification of Pneumonia Through X-Ray Images The Effect of E-Learning and Traditional Teaching Done Hand-in-Hand for First-Year M.B.B.S. Students Decentralized Blockchain-Enabled Employee Authentication System Hybrid Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for Prediction of Death Rate in India Due to COVID-19 Transmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1