CEO activism. What do we know? What don’t we know? A systematic literature review

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0194
Franz Rumstadt, D. Kanbach
{"title":"CEO activism. What do we know? What don’t we know? A systematic literature review","authors":"Franz Rumstadt, D. Kanbach","doi":"10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nChief Executive Officer (CEO) activism, i.e. executives, publicly weighing in on sociopolitical debates, is an area of increasing interest in academia and business. This young research field provides valuable insights, but it still represents a scattered discussion in a variety of disciplines. Thus, this paper aims to present a guiding framework, integrate current knowledge, aggregate published findings and outline avenues for future research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors conducted a systematic literature review building on a sample of 36 publications. In consequence, 1,146 lead themes were derived and studied in an in-depth qualitative analysis by deploying a pattern-inducing method.\n\n\nFindings\nResearch on CEO activism can be placed on a time-oriented logic, giving insights into the realisation of activism, stakeholder reactions, moderators and perception effects. These four aggregate dimensions can be explained by 15 second-order themes and 48 more detailed first-order themes.\n\n\nPractical implications\nConsidering the risks and benefits of CEO activism, top executives and communication professionals should be aware of its implications. This paper provides an integrated view of the different mechanisms and potential effects of CEO activism. Thereby, it proposes communicative planning from activism’s realisation to its perceptual results.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study provides a holistic view of CEO activism as a starting point for further discussion. To the latest of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first integrated conceptualisation of the discussion of CEO activism. The proposed avenues for future research stem from a detailed examination of published knowledge.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2021-0194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Chief Executive Officer (CEO) activism, i.e. executives, publicly weighing in on sociopolitical debates, is an area of increasing interest in academia and business. This young research field provides valuable insights, but it still represents a scattered discussion in a variety of disciplines. Thus, this paper aims to present a guiding framework, integrate current knowledge, aggregate published findings and outline avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature review building on a sample of 36 publications. In consequence, 1,146 lead themes were derived and studied in an in-depth qualitative analysis by deploying a pattern-inducing method. Findings Research on CEO activism can be placed on a time-oriented logic, giving insights into the realisation of activism, stakeholder reactions, moderators and perception effects. These four aggregate dimensions can be explained by 15 second-order themes and 48 more detailed first-order themes. Practical implications Considering the risks and benefits of CEO activism, top executives and communication professionals should be aware of its implications. This paper provides an integrated view of the different mechanisms and potential effects of CEO activism. Thereby, it proposes communicative planning from activism’s realisation to its perceptual results. Originality/value The study provides a holistic view of CEO activism as a starting point for further discussion. To the latest of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first integrated conceptualisation of the discussion of CEO activism. The proposed avenues for future research stem from a detailed examination of published knowledge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CEO行动主义。我们知道什么?我们还不知道什么?系统的文献综述
首席执行官(CEO)行动主义,即高管,在社会政治辩论中公开权衡,是学术界和商界越来越感兴趣的领域。这个年轻的研究领域提供了有价值的见解,但它仍然代表了各种学科的分散讨论。因此,本文旨在提出一个指导框架,整合现有知识,汇总已发表的研究成果,并概述未来研究的途径。设计/方法/方法作者以36份出版物为样本进行了系统的文献综述。因此,通过采用模式诱导方法,对1146个先导主题进行了深入的定性分析和研究。对CEO行动主义的研究可以放在一个以时间为导向的逻辑上,从而深入了解行动主义的实现、利益相关者的反应、调节因素和感知效应。这四个总体维度可以用15个二阶主题和48个更详细的一阶主题来解释。考虑到CEO行动主义的风险和收益,高层管理人员和沟通专业人士应该意识到它的影响。本文对CEO行动主义的不同机制和潜在影响进行了综合分析。因此,它提出了从行动主义的实现到其感知结果的交际计划。原创性/价值本研究提供了CEO行动主义的整体观点,作为进一步讨论的起点。就作者的最新知识而言,这项工作是CEO行动主义讨论的第一个综合概念化。提出的未来研究途径源于对已发表知识的详细检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Environmental catastrophes and organizational ambidexterity: lessons from the Covid-19 experience Organizational stakeholders and environmental sustainability investment: does China’s regional heterogeneity matter? Religious-ethnic entrepreneurs planting seeds: a novel research agenda Bringing home the bacon: do politicians on boards increase firms’ government contracts? The effect of CEOs’ being the only children in the family on their CSR engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1