Assessment of stakeholders' perspectives on infill buildings in the historical settings of an eastern India state – Odisha

IF 1.1 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1108/jchmsd-06-2022-0094
R. N. Mohanty, A. Mohanta
{"title":"Assessment of stakeholders' perspectives on infill buildings in the historical settings of an eastern India state – Odisha","authors":"R. N. Mohanty, A. Mohanta","doi":"10.1108/jchmsd-06-2022-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe infill design approach for heritage settings is a challenging task, and it draws the attention of design professionals and residents. The extant literature has advocated for a contextual design approach for new buildings in heritage sites. However, the degree of contextualism for a new building in heritage sites is subjective, and it varies between exact replication and contrast scales. This study aims to evaluate an appropriate design approach for historic precincts of Odisha, an eastern state of India.Design/methodology/approachTwo prime eastern heritage sites (Puri and Ekamra Kshetra) are selected as cases in this study. This research methodology involves identifying key architectural elements from both sites and a questionnaire (prepared by design experts) based on interviewing 400 residents and 36 design professionals on their aesthetic preferences for the different architectural styles and elements. The questionnaire was prepared by the design experts based on the identified architectural styles and elements of both sites. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis are used to measure the significance of design approaches and elements.FindingsThis study's outcome confirms that most of the respondents (design professionals and residents) prefer the replication design approach with traditional architectural elements of Odisha. Also, documentation of the chronological development of architectural styles and elements of heritage sites of Odisha is done in this research.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has a few limitations: first, the land use characters (mixed, residential, commercial, etc.) of buildings in the heritage precinct are not considered in this research; second, this research has not included the financial aspect of infill design and last, the impact of respondents' socioeconomic factors on their aesthetic perceptions is not considered in this research.Practical implicationsThe development authorities can use the outcomes of this research to implement a design strategy for infill buildings in the historical sites of Odisha.Social implicationsThis research article has documented traditional architectural elements of two prime heritage sites of India.Originality/valueTo date, no quantitative research has been done on infill design approaches in any Indian heritage precincts. This is the first quantitative research on the perception of stakeholders and users on the infill design in historical settings of Eastern India. This research has identified key architectural styles, elements and materials of the heritage sites.","PeriodicalId":45408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-06-2022-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe infill design approach for heritage settings is a challenging task, and it draws the attention of design professionals and residents. The extant literature has advocated for a contextual design approach for new buildings in heritage sites. However, the degree of contextualism for a new building in heritage sites is subjective, and it varies between exact replication and contrast scales. This study aims to evaluate an appropriate design approach for historic precincts of Odisha, an eastern state of India.Design/methodology/approachTwo prime eastern heritage sites (Puri and Ekamra Kshetra) are selected as cases in this study. This research methodology involves identifying key architectural elements from both sites and a questionnaire (prepared by design experts) based on interviewing 400 residents and 36 design professionals on their aesthetic preferences for the different architectural styles and elements. The questionnaire was prepared by the design experts based on the identified architectural styles and elements of both sites. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis are used to measure the significance of design approaches and elements.FindingsThis study's outcome confirms that most of the respondents (design professionals and residents) prefer the replication design approach with traditional architectural elements of Odisha. Also, documentation of the chronological development of architectural styles and elements of heritage sites of Odisha is done in this research.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has a few limitations: first, the land use characters (mixed, residential, commercial, etc.) of buildings in the heritage precinct are not considered in this research; second, this research has not included the financial aspect of infill design and last, the impact of respondents' socioeconomic factors on their aesthetic perceptions is not considered in this research.Practical implicationsThe development authorities can use the outcomes of this research to implement a design strategy for infill buildings in the historical sites of Odisha.Social implicationsThis research article has documented traditional architectural elements of two prime heritage sites of India.Originality/valueTo date, no quantitative research has been done on infill design approaches in any Indian heritage precincts. This is the first quantitative research on the perception of stakeholders and users on the infill design in historical settings of Eastern India. This research has identified key architectural styles, elements and materials of the heritage sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估利益相关者对印度东部奥里萨邦历史环境中填充式建筑的看法
目的遗产环境的填充设计方法是一项具有挑战性的任务,它引起了设计专业人员和居民的注意。现存文献主张对遗产地中的新建筑采用情境设计方法。然而,遗产地中新建筑的背景主义程度是主观的,它在精确的复制和对比尺度之间有所不同。本研究旨在评估印度东部奥里萨邦历史街区的适当设计方法。设计/方法/方法本研究选择了两个主要的东部遗产地(Puri和Ekamra Kshetra)作为案例。该研究方法包括从两个地点确定关键的建筑元素,并在采访400名居民和36名设计专业人员的基础上,就他们对不同建筑风格和元素的审美偏好进行问卷调查(由设计专家编制)。调查问卷由设计专家根据确定的两个场地的建筑风格和元素编制。描述性统计和相关性分析用于衡量设计方法和元素的重要性。发现这项研究的结果证实,大多数受访者(设计专业人士和居民)更喜欢奥迪沙传统建筑元素的复制设计方法。此外,本研究还记录了奥迪沙遗产地建筑风格和元素的时间发展。研究局限性/含义本研究有几个局限性:首先,本研究没有考虑遗产区建筑的土地利用特征(混合、住宅、商业等);其次,本研究没有包括填充设计的财务方面。最后,本研究未考虑受访者的社会经济因素对他们审美观念的影响。实际含义开发当局可以利用这项研究的结果来实施奥迪沙历史遗址中填充式建筑的设计策略。社会含义这篇研究文章记录了印度两个主要遗产地的传统建筑元素。原始性/价值迄今为止,没有对任何印度遗产区的填充设计方法进行定量研究。这是首次在印度东部历史环境中对利益相关者和用户对填充设计的看法进行定量研究。这项研究确定了遗产地的主要建筑风格、元素和材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Socially inclusive urban governance in George Town world heritage site: housing affordability concept revisiting Socially inclusive urban governance in George Town world heritage site: housing affordability concept revisiting Integrating traditional knowledge and cultural heritage with climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction: the role of training and tools Heritage conservation and energy efficiency in adaptive reuse projects the case of Gaziantep, Türkiye Breathing new life into industrial heritage: the digital era's influence on transforming Safawi cinema into a historical museum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1