Zehui Zhan, Wenyao Shen, Zhichao Xu, Shijing Niu, Ge You
{"title":"A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends","authors":"Zehui Zhan, Wenyao Shen, Zhichao Xu, Shijing Niu, Ge You","doi":"10.1108/apjie-08-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to provide a comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis of the literature in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education over the past 15 years, with a specific focus on global distribution and research trends.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study collected 1,718 documents from the Web of Science (WOS) database and analyzed their timeline distribution, geographical distribution, research topics, subject areas, learning stages and citation burst using a bibliometric approach with VOSviewer and Citespace.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicated that: overall, STEM education has increasingly gained scholarly attention and is developing diversely by emphasizing interdisciplinary, cross-domain and regional collaboration. In terms of global collaboration, a collaborative network with the USA in the center is gradually expanding to a global scope. In terms of research themes, four key topics can be outlined including educational equity, pedagogy, empirical effects and career development. Social, cultural and economic factors influence the way STEM education is implemented across different countries. The developed Western countries highlighted educational equity and disciplinary integration, while the developing countries tend to focus more on pedagogical practices. As for research trends, eastern countries are emphasizing humanistic leadership and cultural integration in STEM education; in terms of teachers’ professional development, teachers’ abilities of interdisciplinary integration, technology adoption and pedagogy application are of the greatest importance. With regards to pedagogy, the main focus is for developing students’ higher-order abilities. In terms of education equity, issues of gender and ethnicity were still the hottest topics, while the unbalanced development of STEM education across regions needs further research.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides a global landscape of STEM education along the timeline, which illustrates the yearly progressive development of STEM education and indicates the future trends.\n","PeriodicalId":45219,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-08-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to provide a comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis of the literature in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education over the past 15 years, with a specific focus on global distribution and research trends.
Design/methodology/approach
This study collected 1,718 documents from the Web of Science (WOS) database and analyzed their timeline distribution, geographical distribution, research topics, subject areas, learning stages and citation burst using a bibliometric approach with VOSviewer and Citespace.
Findings
Results indicated that: overall, STEM education has increasingly gained scholarly attention and is developing diversely by emphasizing interdisciplinary, cross-domain and regional collaboration. In terms of global collaboration, a collaborative network with the USA in the center is gradually expanding to a global scope. In terms of research themes, four key topics can be outlined including educational equity, pedagogy, empirical effects and career development. Social, cultural and economic factors influence the way STEM education is implemented across different countries. The developed Western countries highlighted educational equity and disciplinary integration, while the developing countries tend to focus more on pedagogical practices. As for research trends, eastern countries are emphasizing humanistic leadership and cultural integration in STEM education; in terms of teachers’ professional development, teachers’ abilities of interdisciplinary integration, technology adoption and pedagogy application are of the greatest importance. With regards to pedagogy, the main focus is for developing students’ higher-order abilities. In terms of education equity, issues of gender and ethnicity were still the hottest topics, while the unbalanced development of STEM education across regions needs further research.
Originality/value
This study provides a global landscape of STEM education along the timeline, which illustrates the yearly progressive development of STEM education and indicates the future trends.
目的本研究旨在对过去15年来科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育领域的文献进行全面回顾和文献计量分析 年,特别关注全球分布和研究趋势。设计/方法论/方法本研究从Web of Science(WOS)数据库中收集了1718篇文献,并使用VOSviewer和Citespace的文献计量方法分析了它们的时间轴分布、地理分布、研究主题、学科领域、学习阶段和引文爆发,STEM教育日益受到学术界的关注,并通过强调跨学科、跨领域和区域合作而多样化发展。在全球合作方面,以美国为中心的合作网络正在逐步扩大到全球范围。在研究主题方面,可以概述四个关键主题,包括教育公平、教育学、实证效应和职业发展。社会、文化和经济因素影响着STEM教育在不同国家的实施方式。西方发达国家强调教育公平和学科融合,而发展中国家往往更注重教学实践。就研究趋势而言,东方国家在STEM教育中强调人文领导力和文化融合;就教师的专业发展而言,教师的跨学科整合能力、技术采用能力和教育学应用能力至关重要。在教育学方面,主要关注培养学生的高阶能力。在教育公平方面,性别和种族问题仍然是最热门的话题,而跨地区STEM教育发展的不平衡需要进一步研究。独创性/价值本研究提供了STEM教育的全球前景,说明了STEM教学的年度渐进发展,并指明了未来趋势。