“Grabbing the ‘Bull’ by the ‘Horns’”: A Critical Analysis of the Establishment of AfCFTA

Joseph K. Manboah-Rockson
{"title":"“Grabbing the ‘Bull’ by the ‘Horns’”: A Critical Analysis of the Establishment of AfCFTA","authors":"Joseph K. Manboah-Rockson","doi":"10.4236/OJPS.2021.112020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of the Free Trade Area (FTA) covering the whole of \nAfrica is intended to combine the existing Free Trade Areas (FTAs) within the \nRegional Economic Communities (RECs), to attain maximum gains from trade and \nbolster AU’s growth and development objectives. But several regional blocs, \nincluding the Tripartite Free Trade Areas (T-FTA), have all missed their \ndeadlines set to achieve the objectives of the Abuja Treaty of 1991 in six \nstages. This means that the launch of the CFTA has become a parallel process \nwith immediate effect since all FTAs and T-FTA are to collapse into the Af- CFTA when \ntrading commences. The question therefore is, why hasn’t the AU waited until it \ncan harmonize, that is, combine existing arrangements of trade and the movement \nof persons, under its “building blocs” concept for continental unity? In \nlaunching the AfCFTA by the AU, does such a “hasty act,” tantamount to the \nremoval of layers of complexity in Africa’s existing arrangements? The \nprevailing continental state system in Africa, according to functionalists, contributes to continental \ntensions and conflicts because it is institutionally inadequate. Accordingly, \nit cannot deal with the basic continental problems because it has arbitrarily \ndivided continental society into national units based on territory, and not on the problems (or issues) to be solved. This is because any successful integration project \nrequires autonomous and credible central institutions that can act as motors of \nacceleration. Employing theories of functionalism and neo-functionalism, this \npaper is of the view that the attempt to launch the AfCFTA by the AU is an act \nof rebooting the dormant Custom Unions across the respective RECs. The action \nby the AU is to arrest their failures, hence “grabbing the bull by the horns,” so as to empower and also embolden RECs to own the regional \nintegration processes and to build resilience against global shocks.","PeriodicalId":91589,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of political science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of political science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPS.2021.112020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The establishment of the Free Trade Area (FTA) covering the whole of Africa is intended to combine the existing Free Trade Areas (FTAs) within the Regional Economic Communities (RECs), to attain maximum gains from trade and bolster AU’s growth and development objectives. But several regional blocs, including the Tripartite Free Trade Areas (T-FTA), have all missed their deadlines set to achieve the objectives of the Abuja Treaty of 1991 in six stages. This means that the launch of the CFTA has become a parallel process with immediate effect since all FTAs and T-FTA are to collapse into the Af- CFTA when trading commences. The question therefore is, why hasn’t the AU waited until it can harmonize, that is, combine existing arrangements of trade and the movement of persons, under its “building blocs” concept for continental unity? In launching the AfCFTA by the AU, does such a “hasty act,” tantamount to the removal of layers of complexity in Africa’s existing arrangements? The prevailing continental state system in Africa, according to functionalists, contributes to continental tensions and conflicts because it is institutionally inadequate. Accordingly, it cannot deal with the basic continental problems because it has arbitrarily divided continental society into national units based on territory, and not on the problems (or issues) to be solved. This is because any successful integration project requires autonomous and credible central institutions that can act as motors of acceleration. Employing theories of functionalism and neo-functionalism, this paper is of the view that the attempt to launch the AfCFTA by the AU is an act of rebooting the dormant Custom Unions across the respective RECs. The action by the AU is to arrest their failures, hence “grabbing the bull by the horns,” so as to empower and also embolden RECs to own the regional integration processes and to build resilience against global shocks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“牛角抓牛”——对AfCFTA成立的批判性分析
建立覆盖整个非洲的自由贸易区旨在将区域经济共同体内的现有自由贸易区结合起来,以实现贸易的最大收益,并促进非盟的增长和发展目标。但包括三方自由贸易区(T-FTA)在内的几个地区集团都错过了分六个阶段实现1991年《阿布贾条约》目标的最后期限。这意味着CFTA的启动已经成为一个平行的过程,并立即生效,因为当交易开始时,所有的FTA和T-FTA都将崩溃为Af-CFTA。因此,问题是,为什么非盟没有等到它能够在其大陆统一的“建设集团”概念下进行协调,即将现有的贸易安排和人员流动结合起来?非盟发起AfCFTA,这样的“草率行为”是否等于消除了非洲现有安排的复杂性?根据功能主义者的说法,非洲盛行的大陆国家体系助长了大陆的紧张局势和冲突,因为它在制度上不够完善。因此,它无法处理基本的大陆问题,因为它武断地将大陆社会划分为基于领土的国家单位,而不是基于要解决的问题。这是因为任何成功的整合项目都需要自治和可信的中央机构,它们可以充当加速的发动机。本文运用功能主义和新功能主义的理论,认为非盟发起AfCFTA的尝试是在各自的REC中重启休眠的关税同盟的行为。非盟的行动是阻止它们的失败,从而“抓住牛角”,从而赋予区域经济共同体权力,也鼓励它们拥有区域一体化进程,并建立抵御全球冲击的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Issue of Legitimacy of the Political Authority in Modern States Consensus and Climate Change The Civil and Political Rights in the Press Discourse of Britain’s Most Prominent News Websites Case Study: Just War Doctrine Make It or Break It with International Diplomacy: An Analysis of India and Nigeria’s Foreign Policy Pursuits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1