Latinas on the Line: Invisible Information Workers in Telecommunications

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/00943061231172096jj
Sharla N. Alegria
{"title":"Latinas on the Line: Invisible Information Workers in Telecommunications","authors":"Sharla N. Alegria","doi":"10.1177/00943061231172096jj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and candidates, accidently or otherwise. Importantly, the authors find that these participatory boosts were not limited to ideological extremes, nor did they favor the center-left or center-right. The proverbial rising tide lifted all ships. Finally, they find that the national context has mixed results on the relationship between social media and political participation. For example, they find that the effects of electoral mobilization efforts via social media are larger on users’ participation in partycentric political systems than candidatecentric ones. However, they also find that the structure of the media system didn’t always influence political participation. In the concluding chapter of the book, the authors grapple with what their results mean for democratic theory and democracy. There are no easy answers here, and the chapter is worth a close read. The overriding message, however, is that we can exhale and perhaps wring our hands less vigorously. Social media aren’t just toxic bubbles filled with content that radicalizes the most politically extreme among us. For the average user, social media offer a diverse and rich political information ecosystem in which most users—one way or another—will be exposed to political ideas. If anything, there is reason to be optimistic about the role of social media in political participation because it reduces participation gaps by engaging the disconnected and giving them a voice in democratic processes. Hopefully, other researchers will follow Vaccari and Valeriani’s lead and focus less on the political extremes and more on average social media users, who constitute the bulk of the citizenry. Latinas on the Line: Invisible Information Workers in Telecommunications, by Melissa Villa-Nicholas. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2022. 158 pp. $24.95 paper. ISBN: 9781978813717.","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"285 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231172096jj","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

and candidates, accidently or otherwise. Importantly, the authors find that these participatory boosts were not limited to ideological extremes, nor did they favor the center-left or center-right. The proverbial rising tide lifted all ships. Finally, they find that the national context has mixed results on the relationship between social media and political participation. For example, they find that the effects of electoral mobilization efforts via social media are larger on users’ participation in partycentric political systems than candidatecentric ones. However, they also find that the structure of the media system didn’t always influence political participation. In the concluding chapter of the book, the authors grapple with what their results mean for democratic theory and democracy. There are no easy answers here, and the chapter is worth a close read. The overriding message, however, is that we can exhale and perhaps wring our hands less vigorously. Social media aren’t just toxic bubbles filled with content that radicalizes the most politically extreme among us. For the average user, social media offer a diverse and rich political information ecosystem in which most users—one way or another—will be exposed to political ideas. If anything, there is reason to be optimistic about the role of social media in political participation because it reduces participation gaps by engaging the disconnected and giving them a voice in democratic processes. Hopefully, other researchers will follow Vaccari and Valeriani’s lead and focus less on the political extremes and more on average social media users, who constitute the bulk of the citizenry. Latinas on the Line: Invisible Information Workers in Telecommunications, by Melissa Villa-Nicholas. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2022. 158 pp. $24.95 paper. ISBN: 9781978813717.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁裔在线:电信行业的隐形信息工作者
和候选人,无论是偶然的还是其他的。重要的是,作者发现,这些参与性的提升不仅限于意识形态的极端,也不支持中左翼或中右翼。众所周知的涨潮把所有的船都掀起来了。最后,他们发现,在社交媒体和政治参与之间的关系上,国家背景的结果喜忧参半。例如,他们发现,通过社交媒体进行的选举动员对用户参与以政党为中心的政治制度的影响大于以候选人为中心的制度。然而,他们也发现,媒体体系的结构并不总是影响政治参与。在本书的最后一章,作者们努力探讨他们的研究结果对民主理论和民主意味着什么。这里没有简单的答案,这一章值得仔细阅读。然而,最重要的信息是,我们可以呼气,也许可以不那么用力地拧着手。社交媒体不仅仅是充满内容的有毒泡沫,这些内容会让我们当中最极端的政治分子变得激进。对于普通用户来说,社交媒体提供了一个多样而丰富的政治信息生态系统,在这个生态系统中,大多数用户——无论以何种方式——都会接触到政治思想。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是有理由对社交媒体在政治参与中的作用持乐观态度,因为它通过让脱节的人参与进来并让他们在民主进程中有发言权来减少参与差距。希望其他研究人员能效仿瓦卡里和瓦莱里亚尼的做法,少关注政治极端,多关注占公民大部分的普通社交媒体用户。《拉丁裔在线:电信中的隐形信息工作者》,梅丽莎·维拉·尼古拉斯著。新泽西州新不伦瑞克:罗格斯大学出版社,2022年。158页,论文24.95美元。ISBN:9781978813717。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊最新文献
How the Clinic Made Gender: The Medical History of a Transformative Idea Prisons of Debt: The Afterlives of Incarcerated Fathers Working-Class Kids Photographing Childhood: Valuing Care, Reciprocity, Sociality, and Dignity Literature in the Dawn of Sociological Theory: Stories That Are Telling On Expertise: Cultivating Character, Goodwill, and Practical Wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1