Evaluasi Pola dan Rasionalitas Penggunaan Antibiotik pada Pasien Neonatus di Ruang NICU dan Perinatal RSUD Banjarnegara

Nindita Sari Nastiti, Ika Puspitasari, N. A. Nurulita
{"title":"Evaluasi Pola dan Rasionalitas Penggunaan Antibiotik pada Pasien Neonatus di Ruang NICU dan Perinatal RSUD Banjarnegara","authors":"Nindita Sari Nastiti, Ika Puspitasari, N. A. Nurulita","doi":"10.22435/jki.v13i1.5293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neonates are particularly susceptible to infections caused by exposure to microorganisms during labor or shortly after birth. Some neonates require treatment in the NICU and perinatal rooms because of cases of infection that require antibiotics as therapy. This study aimed to determine the pattern of antimicrobial administration, antimicrobial rationality, and its relationship to clinical outcomes. This study used a cross-sectional design with prospective data collection using the medical record of neonates in the NICU and Perinatal rooms at RSUD Banjarnegara during November 2020-January 2021. The samples in this study were all neonatal patients who received antibiotics. Evaluation of antibiotics use was carried out using the Gyssens method. Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the description of the research sample and the antibiotics used. A total of 131 samples had normal birth weight characteristics of 71%. The single antibiotic most frequently used as amoxicillin (21 patients), and the combination antibiotic was ampicillin+gentamicin (106 patients). The results of the evaluation using the Gyssens method showed that patients received 265 antibiotics, 85.55% were in category 0, 8.75% in category IIa, 3.8% in category IIIb, and 1.9% in category IIb. Of the 131 neonates treated, 124 patients were declared improved and 7 others died. The correlation between antibiotic rationality and clinical outcomes was analyzed by Chi-square, the result of the Asymp value. Sig (2-sided) 0.138 which means there is no relationship between the two. The rationality and effectiveness of clinical outcomes of antibiotics used during the study were considered good because the number of patients who were discharged with improved conditions was much greater than those who died.","PeriodicalId":31842,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22435/jki.v13i1.5293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonates are particularly susceptible to infections caused by exposure to microorganisms during labor or shortly after birth. Some neonates require treatment in the NICU and perinatal rooms because of cases of infection that require antibiotics as therapy. This study aimed to determine the pattern of antimicrobial administration, antimicrobial rationality, and its relationship to clinical outcomes. This study used a cross-sectional design with prospective data collection using the medical record of neonates in the NICU and Perinatal rooms at RSUD Banjarnegara during November 2020-January 2021. The samples in this study were all neonatal patients who received antibiotics. Evaluation of antibiotics use was carried out using the Gyssens method. Descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the description of the research sample and the antibiotics used. A total of 131 samples had normal birth weight characteristics of 71%. The single antibiotic most frequently used as amoxicillin (21 patients), and the combination antibiotic was ampicillin+gentamicin (106 patients). The results of the evaluation using the Gyssens method showed that patients received 265 antibiotics, 85.55% were in category 0, 8.75% in category IIa, 3.8% in category IIIb, and 1.9% in category IIb. Of the 131 neonates treated, 124 patients were declared improved and 7 others died. The correlation between antibiotic rationality and clinical outcomes was analyzed by Chi-square, the result of the Asymp value. Sig (2-sided) 0.138 which means there is no relationship between the two. The rationality and effectiveness of clinical outcomes of antibiotics used during the study were considered good because the number of patients who were discharged with improved conditions was much greater than those who died.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新生儿在NICU和Banjarnegara空间使用抗生素的模式和理性
新生儿特别容易受到分娩期间或出生后不久因接触微生物而引起的感染。一些新生儿需要在新生儿重症监护室和围产期室治疗,因为感染病例需要抗生素作为治疗。本研究旨在确定抗菌药物的使用模式、抗菌药物的合理性及其与临床结果的关系。本研究采用横断面设计,前瞻性数据收集使用2020年11月至2021年1月期间Banjarnegara RSUD新生儿重症监护病房和围产期新生儿的医疗记录。本研究的样本均为接受抗生素治疗的新生儿患者。采用Gyssens法对抗生素使用情况进行评价。进行描述性分析以确定研究样本的描述和使用的抗生素。131个样本的出生体重特征为71%。最常用的单一抗生素为阿莫西林(21例),联合抗生素为氨苄西林+庆大霉素(106例)。采用Gyssens法评价结果显示,患者共使用了265种抗生素,其中0类占85.55%,IIa类占8.75%,IIIb类占3.8%,IIb类占1.9%。在接受治疗的131名新生儿中,124名患者被宣布好转,另有7名死亡。采用Asymp值结果卡方分析抗生素合理性与临床结局的相关性。Sig(双侧)0.138,这意味着两者之间没有关系。研究期间使用抗生素的临床结果的合理性和有效性被认为是好的,因为出院时病情好转的患者数量远远大于死亡的患者数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pengaruh Pemberian Kombinasi Ekstrak Etanol Piper crocatum dan Ekstrak Akuades Elaeocarpus ganitrus pada Kadar Gula Tikus Analisis Efektifitas Biaya Terapi Pengobatan Pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 terhadap Kontrol Glukosa Darah Validasi Metode Analisis Penetapan Kadar Protein Ekstrak Ikan Gabus dengan Metode Lowry dan Bromocresol Green Efek Ekstrak Etanol Daun Kelor terhadap Kadar Kreatinin Serum dan Superoksida Dismutase Tikus Model 5/6 Subtotal Nefrektomi Penggunaan Deksametason pada Pasien COVID-19: Systematic Review dan Meta-analisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1