Cultural Spaces as Political Spaces: The Musical Field of the German Democratic Republic

IF 1.4 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Cultural Sociology Pub Date : 2022-06-08 DOI:10.1177/17499755221078713
B. Grüning
{"title":"Cultural Spaces as Political Spaces: The Musical Field of the German Democratic Republic","authors":"B. Grüning","doi":"10.1177/17499755221078713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the relationship between music and politics in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), departing from the crucial role the State played there in organizing, and controlling all fields of cultural production. Much of the literature on the subject either depicts the interaction between the State and artists as unidirectional or represents their relationship as highly conflictual due to contrasting understandings of culture and its functions. In both cases, this tendency to dichotomize makes it hard to explain, for instance, how music genres that had arisen in Western countries could flourish in the GDR despite the official understanding of ‘socialist music’ propagated by the Socialist Unity Party (SED). Conversely, by adopting a field perspective, this article aims to highlight how musicians, the State, and Party representatives competed to shape the symbolic space of the GDR musical field. Hence, instead of understanding Party and State decisions as merely applications of ideological principles, a field perspective enables us to consider them as resulting from strategies, depending on both the objective position occupied in the musical field and its spatial-material dimension, and as aimed at maintaining their own power within it. The political elite succeeded, then, in actualizing its strategy of legitimating emerging music genres which were potentially disrupting until it was able to provide musicians with physical cultural spaces for developing their careers and, at the same time, expressing criticisms. On the other hand, from the 1950s, localized music scenes were created which proposed an alternative understanding of music to the official one without, however, refusing the core principles which structured the GDR musical field. After the end of the 1970s, though, new music scenes were formed which positioned themselves outside the institutionalized music spaces and places, refusing in this way the rules of the GDR musical field and questioning its very existence.","PeriodicalId":46722,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Sociology","volume":"17 1","pages":"225 - 251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221078713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between music and politics in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), departing from the crucial role the State played there in organizing, and controlling all fields of cultural production. Much of the literature on the subject either depicts the interaction between the State and artists as unidirectional or represents their relationship as highly conflictual due to contrasting understandings of culture and its functions. In both cases, this tendency to dichotomize makes it hard to explain, for instance, how music genres that had arisen in Western countries could flourish in the GDR despite the official understanding of ‘socialist music’ propagated by the Socialist Unity Party (SED). Conversely, by adopting a field perspective, this article aims to highlight how musicians, the State, and Party representatives competed to shape the symbolic space of the GDR musical field. Hence, instead of understanding Party and State decisions as merely applications of ideological principles, a field perspective enables us to consider them as resulting from strategies, depending on both the objective position occupied in the musical field and its spatial-material dimension, and as aimed at maintaining their own power within it. The political elite succeeded, then, in actualizing its strategy of legitimating emerging music genres which were potentially disrupting until it was able to provide musicians with physical cultural spaces for developing their careers and, at the same time, expressing criticisms. On the other hand, from the 1950s, localized music scenes were created which proposed an alternative understanding of music to the official one without, however, refusing the core principles which structured the GDR musical field. After the end of the 1970s, though, new music scenes were formed which positioned themselves outside the institutionalized music spaces and places, refusing in this way the rules of the GDR musical field and questioning its very existence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为政治空间的文化空间:德意志民主共和国的音乐场
本文考察了德意志民主共和国(GDR)音乐与政治之间的关系,脱离了国家在组织和控制文化生产各个领域中所发挥的关键作用。关于这一主题的许多文献要么将国家和艺术家之间的互动描述为单向的,要么由于对文化及其功能的不同理解而将他们的关系描述为高度矛盾的。在这两种情况下,这种二分法的倾向使得很难解释,例如,尽管社会主义统一党(SED)对“社会主义音乐”有着官方的理解,但西方国家兴起的音乐流派是如何在民主德国蓬勃发展的。相反,通过采用领域视角,本文旨在强调音乐家、国家和政党代表如何竞争塑造民主德国音乐领域的象征空间。因此,我们不应将党和国家的决定理解为仅仅是意识形态原则的应用,而应将其视为战略的结果,这取决于音乐领域所占据的客观地位及其空间物质维度,并旨在维护其自身在音乐领域的权力,在实现其将新兴音乐流派合法化的战略时,这些音乐流派可能会被颠覆,直到它能够为音乐家提供发展职业生涯的物质文化空间,同时表达批评。另一方面,从20世纪50年代开始,本地化的音乐场景被创造出来,它提出了一种对音乐的替代理解,而不是官方的理解,然而,它并没有拒绝构成民主德国音乐领域的核心原则。然而,在20世纪70年代末之后,新的音乐场景形成了,它们将自己定位在制度化的音乐空间和场所之外,以这种方式拒绝了民主德国音乐领域的规则,并质疑其存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Sociology
Cultural Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Cultural Sociology publishes empirically oriented, theoretically sophisticated, methodologically rigorous papers, which explore from a broad set of sociological perspectives a diverse range of socio-cultural forces, phenomena, institutions and contexts. The objective of Cultural Sociology is to publish original articles which advance the field of cultural sociology and the sociology of culture. The journal seeks to consolidate, develop and promote the arena of sociological understandings of culture, and is intended to be pivotal in defining both what this arena is like currently and what it could become in the future. Cultural Sociology will publish innovative, sociologically-informed work concerned with cultural processes and artefacts, broadly defined.
期刊最新文献
The ‘Not Quite’ as a Form of Relationality Eugenics and the Racialisation of ‘White Eastern Europeans’ Central European Populists and the Racialization of Various Others When, How, and in Relation to Whom is ‘Race’ at Play in Invocations of ‘Eastern Europe’? ‘Eastern Europeanism’: A Rethinking of ‘Race and Racism’ by and Against White People from Central and Eastern Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1