Detecting the factors affecting classroom dialogue quality

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2023.101223
Chrysi Rapanta , Andrea Miralda-Banda , Mercè Garcia-Milà , Maria Vrikki , Fabrizio Macagno , Maria Evagorou
{"title":"Detecting the factors affecting classroom dialogue quality","authors":"Chrysi Rapanta ,&nbsp;Andrea Miralda-Banda ,&nbsp;Mercè Garcia-Milà ,&nbsp;Maria Vrikki ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Macagno ,&nbsp;Maria Evagorou","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2023.101223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the emphasis on dialogue and argumentation in educational settings, still not much is known about how best we can support learners in their interthinking, reasoning, and metadialogic understanding. The goal of this classroom intervention study is to explore the degree of students’ dialogicity and its possible increase during a learning programme implementing dialogic and argument-based teaching goals and principles. In particular, we focus on how students from 5 to 15 years old engage with each other's ideas, and whether/how this engagement is influenced by lesson and classroom setting factors. The participants were 4208 students distributed in preprimary, primary, and secondary classrooms of five countries (UK, Portugal, Germany, Spain, and Cyprus). Findings suggest that there is a consistent increase with age for some high-dialogicity moves, and students behave more dialogically in whole-class discussions rather than small-group activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589823000827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the emphasis on dialogue and argumentation in educational settings, still not much is known about how best we can support learners in their interthinking, reasoning, and metadialogic understanding. The goal of this classroom intervention study is to explore the degree of students’ dialogicity and its possible increase during a learning programme implementing dialogic and argument-based teaching goals and principles. In particular, we focus on how students from 5 to 15 years old engage with each other's ideas, and whether/how this engagement is influenced by lesson and classroom setting factors. The participants were 4208 students distributed in preprimary, primary, and secondary classrooms of five countries (UK, Portugal, Germany, Spain, and Cyprus). Findings suggest that there is a consistent increase with age for some high-dialogicity moves, and students behave more dialogically in whole-class discussions rather than small-group activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发现影响课堂对话质量的因素
尽管在教育环境中强调对话和论证,但我们对如何最好地支持学习者的相互思考、推理和元对话理解仍然知之甚少。本课堂干预研究的目的是探讨在实施对话和论证为基础的教学目标和原则的学习计划中,学生的对话程度及其可能的提高。我们特别关注5至15岁的学生如何参与彼此的想法,以及这种参与是否/如何受到课程和课堂设置因素的影响。参与者是4208名学生,分布在五个国家(英国、葡萄牙、德国、西班牙和塞浦路斯)的小学、小学和中学教室。研究结果表明,随着年龄的增长,一些高对话性的动作会持续增加,学生在全班讨论中表现得更有对话性,而不是小组活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
期刊最新文献
Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language” Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy Pre-service teachers’ hinting practices in managing responses in a microteaching context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1