Reform Incentives, Transform the Grid: Making Good on Hawai'i's Renewable Energy Ambitions

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Ecology Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2018-05-06 DOI:10.15779/Z384B2X52K
Tyler McNish
{"title":"Reform Incentives, Transform the Grid: Making Good on Hawai'i's Renewable Energy Ambitions","authors":"Tyler McNish","doi":"10.15779/Z384B2X52K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2008, Hawai'i's electric utilities and state government committed to transforming Hawai'i' into a world leader in the adoption of renewable energy. The characteristics of Hawai'i's electricity system – including high imported fossil fuel costs – appeared to make this project more technically feasible, economically attractive, and politically popular in Hawai'i' than in any other state. And yet, a decade later, Hawai'i's electricity grids remain less renewable than those of many mainland states (such as California), and continue to emit 35% more carbon per kilowatt-hour than the U.S. average. Why? In this article, I trace the disappointments of the last decade to incentives problems endemic to Hawai'i's electricity law. Specifically, Hawai'i's attempt to hybridize the traditional vertically integrated utility model with pro-competition policies encourages independent power producers to take the lead in developing transformative renewable projects, but leaves them reliant on traditionally regulated utilities with an incentive to favor their utility-owned projects. In the resulting stalemate, both utilities and independent power producers propose transformative projects, but neither has the power to bring those projects to completion. The options for improving incentives in Hawai'i's electricity sector fall into three categories: (1) performance-based ratemaking; (2) industry restructuring; and (3) cooperatization or municipalization. I conclude that performance-based ratemaking, wheeling-based restructuring, and ISO-based restructuring are unlikely to furnish a sound framework for Hawai'i's electricity sector. By contrast, a simpler generation divestiture reform based on the Transco model of restructuring has potential, as do governance changes like cooperatization or municipalization. By clearing out the unnecessary incentives conflicts that have hampered progress over the last decade, these policies could allow Hawai'i' to make good on its renewable energy ambitions over the next decade.","PeriodicalId":45532,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Law Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z384B2X52K","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2008, Hawai'i's electric utilities and state government committed to transforming Hawai'i' into a world leader in the adoption of renewable energy. The characteristics of Hawai'i's electricity system – including high imported fossil fuel costs – appeared to make this project more technically feasible, economically attractive, and politically popular in Hawai'i' than in any other state. And yet, a decade later, Hawai'i's electricity grids remain less renewable than those of many mainland states (such as California), and continue to emit 35% more carbon per kilowatt-hour than the U.S. average. Why? In this article, I trace the disappointments of the last decade to incentives problems endemic to Hawai'i's electricity law. Specifically, Hawai'i's attempt to hybridize the traditional vertically integrated utility model with pro-competition policies encourages independent power producers to take the lead in developing transformative renewable projects, but leaves them reliant on traditionally regulated utilities with an incentive to favor their utility-owned projects. In the resulting stalemate, both utilities and independent power producers propose transformative projects, but neither has the power to bring those projects to completion. The options for improving incentives in Hawai'i's electricity sector fall into three categories: (1) performance-based ratemaking; (2) industry restructuring; and (3) cooperatization or municipalization. I conclude that performance-based ratemaking, wheeling-based restructuring, and ISO-based restructuring are unlikely to furnish a sound framework for Hawai'i's electricity sector. By contrast, a simpler generation divestiture reform based on the Transco model of restructuring has potential, as do governance changes like cooperatization or municipalization. By clearing out the unnecessary incentives conflicts that have hampered progress over the last decade, these policies could allow Hawai'i' to make good on its renewable energy ambitions over the next decade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改革激励,改造电网:实现夏威夷可再生能源的雄心
2008年,夏威夷的电力公司和州政府承诺将夏威夷转变为采用可再生能源的世界领先者。夏威夷电力系统的特点——包括高昂的进口化石燃料成本——似乎使这个项目在技术上更可行,在经济上更有吸引力,在政治上比在其他任何州都更受欢迎。然而,十年后,夏威夷电网的可再生能源仍然低于许多大陆州(如加利福尼亚),并且每千瓦时的碳排放量比美国平均水平高出35%。为什么?在这篇文章中,我将过去十年的失望归结为夏威夷电力法特有的激励问题。具体来说,夏威夷试图将传统的垂直整合的公用事业模式与支持竞争的政策结合起来,鼓励独立的电力生产商率先开发变革性的可再生能源项目,但却使他们依赖传统的受监管的公用事业,从而激励他们支持公用事业拥有的项目。在由此产生的僵局中,公用事业公司和独立电力生产商都提出了转型项目,但都没有能力完成这些项目。改善夏威夷电力部门激励措施的选择分为三类:(1)基于绩效的费率制定;(2)产业结构调整;(三)合作化或者市民化。我的结论是,基于绩效的费率制定、基于车轮的重组和基于iso的重组不太可能为夏威夷的电力部门提供一个健全的框架。相比之下,基于Transco重组模式的更简单的一代资产剥离改革有潜力,合作化或市政化等治理变革也有潜力。通过清除过去十年阻碍进展的不必要的激励冲突,这些政策可以使夏威夷在未来十年实现其可再生能源的雄心壮志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecology Law Quarterly"s primary function is to produce two high quality journals: a quarterly print version and a more frequent, cutting-edge online journal, Ecology Law Currents. UC Berkeley School of Law students manage every aspect of ELQ, from communicating with authors to editing articles to publishing the journals. In addition to featuring work by leading environmental law scholars, ELQ encourages student writing and publishes student pieces.
期刊最新文献
Measuring pragmatic competence of discourse output among Chinese-speaking individuals with traumatic brain injury. Finding Elegance in Unexpected Places Carbon Dioxide Removal after Paris Vindicating Public Environmental Interest: Defining the Role of Enviornmental Public Interest Litigation in China Opening Reflection: The Elegance of International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1