Stealth cranioplasty in symptomatic adult chiari 1 malformations: Experience at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

Asifur Rahman, Md. Atikur Rahman, Md. Shamsul Alam, Abu Saleh Mohammad Abu Obaida, Mohammad Farid Raihan, A. N. W. Uddin, A. Hossain, Mohammad Ruhul Kuddus, M. Hossain, A. Khan
{"title":"Stealth cranioplasty in symptomatic adult chiari 1 malformations: Experience at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University","authors":"Asifur Rahman, Md. Atikur Rahman, Md. Shamsul Alam, Abu Saleh Mohammad Abu Obaida, Mohammad Farid Raihan, A. N. W. Uddin, A. Hossain, Mohammad Ruhul Kuddus, M. Hossain, A. Khan","doi":"10.3329/bsmmuj.v16i1.65660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The surgical management of symptomatic adult Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) with or without syringomyelia (SM) continues to be a dilemma considering the outcomes.\nObjectives: The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between stealth cranioplasty (SC) and one of the most commonly practiced standard procedures, posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD). Clinical outcomes between SC and another procedure posterior fossa decompression (PFD) were also compared.\nMethods: This comparative cross-sectional study was carried out on 37 males and 16 females symptomatic adult CM1 patients, ranging from 18 to 47 years of age from June 2019 to May 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed, compared, and analyzed in terms of changes in clinical symptoms and signs, chicago chiari outcome scale (CCOS) score, and occurrence of complications. \nResults: Of the 53 patients, 23, 19 and 11 underwent SC, PFDD, and PFD, respectively. There were no significant post-operative changes in symptoms and signs among groups except changes in limb weakness between SC and PFDD (P=0.004). Considering average CCOS score, SC performed better only than PFDD (P=0.003), while category-wise SC was better than both PFDD (P=0.004) and PFD (P=0.010). Considering complications, the PFDD group had a significantly higher rate of complications than the SC group (P=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the PFD and SC groups.\nConclusion: SC was found to have better clinical outcomes than the PFDD and PFD groups as a technique.\nBangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal 2023;16(1): 08-16","PeriodicalId":8681,"journal":{"name":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v16i1.65660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The surgical management of symptomatic adult Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) with or without syringomyelia (SM) continues to be a dilemma considering the outcomes. Objectives: The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between stealth cranioplasty (SC) and one of the most commonly practiced standard procedures, posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD). Clinical outcomes between SC and another procedure posterior fossa decompression (PFD) were also compared. Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was carried out on 37 males and 16 females symptomatic adult CM1 patients, ranging from 18 to 47 years of age from June 2019 to May 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed, compared, and analyzed in terms of changes in clinical symptoms and signs, chicago chiari outcome scale (CCOS) score, and occurrence of complications.  Results: Of the 53 patients, 23, 19 and 11 underwent SC, PFDD, and PFD, respectively. There were no significant post-operative changes in symptoms and signs among groups except changes in limb weakness between SC and PFDD (P=0.004). Considering average CCOS score, SC performed better only than PFDD (P=0.003), while category-wise SC was better than both PFDD (P=0.004) and PFD (P=0.010). Considering complications, the PFDD group had a significantly higher rate of complications than the SC group (P=0.001), while there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the PFD and SC groups. Conclusion: SC was found to have better clinical outcomes than the PFDD and PFD groups as a technique. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal 2023;16(1): 08-16
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐藏式颅骨成形术治疗成人chiari 1型畸形:Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学的经验
背景:考虑到治疗结果,伴有或不伴有脊髓空洞(SM)的成人1型Chiari畸形(CM1)的手术治疗仍然是一个难题。目的:该研究旨在比较隐形颅骨成形术(SC)和最常用的标准手术之一,后颅窝减压硬脑膜成形术(PFDD)的临床结果。SC和另一种后颅窝减压(PFD)的临床结果也进行了比较。方法:对2019年6月至2021年5月有症状的成年CM1患者37名男性和16名女性进行比较横断面研究,年龄从18岁到47岁。从临床症状和体征的变化、CCOS评分和并发症的发生等方面对临床结果进行评估、比较和分析。结果:53例患者中,分别有23例、19例和11例接受了SC、PFDD和PFD。除SC组和PFDD组的肢体无力变化外,各组术后症状和体征无明显变化(P=0.004)。考虑平均CCOS评分,SC仅优于PFDD (P=0.003),而分类上SC均优于PFDD (P=0.004)和PFD (P=0.010)。并发症方面,PFDD组的并发症发生率明显高于SC组(P=0.001),而PFD组与SC组的并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:作为一种技术,SC比PFDD和PFD组有更好的临床效果。Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学学报,2023;16(1):08-16
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current Trends of Alternatives to Hysterectomy in Adenomyosis: A Review Article Dissection Method and Diathermy Cauterization in Tonsillectomy- A Hospital Based Comparative Study Diaphragmatic Hernia (Bochdalek Hernia) in an Adult: a Case Report Outcomes of Patients with COVID-19 in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh Risk Factors of Birth Defects: A Case-control Study in a Tertiary Level Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1