Cognitive Semantics Quest for the Ultimate Source Domain

IF 0.4 0 LITERATURE Acta Neophilologica Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.31648/an.8768
Anna Drogosz
{"title":"Cognitive Semantics Quest for the Ultimate Source Domain","authors":"Anna Drogosz","doi":"10.31648/an.8768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is an attempt to answer the question asked in Cognitive Semantics: Which experiential domain should be considered to be more fundamental or “ultimate”: space, an object or a human being? It is argued that they represent three domains of behaviour identified by archaeologists (the technical domain, the domain of social relations, and the natural history domain), and consequently are equally ultimate. It is also argued that the ability to project knowledge from one domain to the other was the crucial stage in the development of metaphor and abstract thinking, and that this ability (called cognitive fluidity or conceptual integration) was exapted from the physical to abstract domain.","PeriodicalId":53820,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neophilologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neophilologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/an.8768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper is an attempt to answer the question asked in Cognitive Semantics: Which experiential domain should be considered to be more fundamental or “ultimate”: space, an object or a human being? It is argued that they represent three domains of behaviour identified by archaeologists (the technical domain, the domain of social relations, and the natural history domain), and consequently are equally ultimate. It is also argued that the ability to project knowledge from one domain to the other was the crucial stage in the development of metaphor and abstract thinking, and that this ability (called cognitive fluidity or conceptual integration) was exapted from the physical to abstract domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知语义学对终极源域的探索
这篇论文试图回答认知语义学中提出的问题:哪个经验领域应该被认为是更基本或“终极”的:空间、物体还是人?有人认为,它们代表了考古学家确定的三个行为领域(技术领域、社会关系领域和自然历史领域),因此同样是终极的。也有人认为,将知识从一个领域投射到另一个领域的能力是隐喻和抽象思维发展的关键阶段,这种能力(称为认知流动性或概念整合)是从物理领域到抽象领域的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neophilologica
Acta Neophilologica LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The scientific journal Acta Neophilologica is the review of Slovenian experts in English-speaking, German-speaking and French- and Italian-speaking literary historians that publishes scientific studies of international and domestic scientists in the field of Western-European, American and other literatures in English. The journal pays special attention to the problems from the history of cultural and especially literary and theatre contacts between Slovenia and Western-European literatures, as well as the problems of Slovenian emigrant literature. The articles are published in the world language (English, German, French, Italian) the literature of which the author analyzes, the abstracts are written in a foreign language and the summaries in the Slovenian language.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive Foundations of Ethical Literary Studies Witchcraft or Otherness Die Heinrich-Heine-Rezeption in der im slowenischen ethnischen Gebiet erschienenen Presse bis 1860 Mehrsprachigkeit in der ukrainischen Literatur am Beispiel der Autorinnen Sofija Jablons’ka und Has’ka Šyjan The Appeal of Haiku in the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1