Revisiting the Role of Ultrasound Mapping in Arteriovenous Fistula Formation: A Single-Center Experience for CME Credit December 2022

A. Vo, Thanh Van Nguyen, S. Kieu, An Quang Kieu, Kha Tan Huynh, Quynh Ngoc Hoa Nguyen, Truc T. T. Nguyen, Tien Cong Nguyen
{"title":"Revisiting the Role of Ultrasound Mapping in Arteriovenous Fistula Formation: A Single-Center Experience for CME Credit December 2022","authors":"A. Vo, Thanh Van Nguyen, S. Kieu, An Quang Kieu, Kha Tan Huynh, Quynh Ngoc Hoa Nguyen, Truc T. T. Nguyen, Tien Cong Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/15443167221113867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, with the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the most preferred vascular access for hemodialysis. Whether routine preoperative ultrasound mapping improves the outcome of AVF formation compared with clinical examination alone remains controversial. This retrospective study included patients undergoing AVF surgery with and without preoperative ultrasound at our center between September 2017 and August 2020. Outcome measures included AVF early and mid-term outcome. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of favorable AVF outcome. A total of 158 patients received an AVF during the study period. Both groups with (n = 79) and without (n = 79) ultrasound mapping were similar regarding baseline characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities). Patency rates were comparable between the 2 groups at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after AVF surgery, although there was a trend toward more favorable outcome for the mapping group ( P = .07). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that at the end of study, the ultrasound mapping group had a higher mid-term patency rate; however, the improvement was not significant ( P = .07). Cox regression analysis did not reveal age, gender, comorbidities, and ultrasound as predictors of AVF survival. Our study did not find a significant benefit from routine preoperative ultrasound mapping in creating AVFs for hemodialysis. Further well-designed and adequately powered trials are needed to demonstrate the beneficial role of routine preoperative ultrasound mapping for vascular access in CKD coupled with clinical evaluation in short- and long-term AVF outcome.","PeriodicalId":52510,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","volume":"46 1","pages":"180 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167221113867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to increase, with the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) as the most preferred vascular access for hemodialysis. Whether routine preoperative ultrasound mapping improves the outcome of AVF formation compared with clinical examination alone remains controversial. This retrospective study included patients undergoing AVF surgery with and without preoperative ultrasound at our center between September 2017 and August 2020. Outcome measures included AVF early and mid-term outcome. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of favorable AVF outcome. A total of 158 patients received an AVF during the study period. Both groups with (n = 79) and without (n = 79) ultrasound mapping were similar regarding baseline characteristics (age, sex, comorbidities). Patency rates were comparable between the 2 groups at 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after AVF surgery, although there was a trend toward more favorable outcome for the mapping group ( P = .07). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that at the end of study, the ultrasound mapping group had a higher mid-term patency rate; however, the improvement was not significant ( P = .07). Cox regression analysis did not reveal age, gender, comorbidities, and ultrasound as predictors of AVF survival. Our study did not find a significant benefit from routine preoperative ultrasound mapping in creating AVFs for hemodialysis. Further well-designed and adequately powered trials are needed to demonstrate the beneficial role of routine preoperative ultrasound mapping for vascular access in CKD coupled with clinical evaluation in short- and long-term AVF outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾超声标测在动静脉瘘形成中的作用:CME的单中心经验来源:2022年12月
全球慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的患病率持续上升,动静脉瘘(AVF)是血液透析最首选的血管通路。与单独的临床检查相比,常规术前超声标测是否能改善AVF形成的结果仍存在争议。这项回顾性研究包括2017年9月至2020年8月在我们中心接受AVF手术的患者,包括术前超声检查和未超声检查的患者。结果测量包括AVF早期和中期结果。Cox回归分析用于确定AVF结果良好的独立预测因素。在研究期间,共有158名患者接受了AVF治疗。在基线特征(年龄、性别、合并症)方面,有(n=79)超声标测和没有(n=79。AVF手术后30天、3个月和6个月,两组的通畅率具有可比性,尽管标测组有更有利的结果趋势(P=0.07)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在研究结束时,超声标测组的中期通畅率更高;然而,改善并不显著(P=.07)。Cox回归分析没有显示年龄、性别、合并症和超声作为AVF生存的预测因素。我们的研究没有发现常规术前超声标测在创建用于血液透析的AVF方面有显著益处。需要进一步精心设计和充分的试验来证明常规术前超声标测对CKD血管通路的有益作用,并结合临床评估对短期和长期AVF结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
The Thrill is Gone Indirect Duplex Ultrasound Diagnosis of Innominate Artery Occlusive Disease Fibromuscular Dysplasia in Vascular Ultrasound Relationship Between Diameter and Pelvic Vein Reflux Single-Center Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1