"Swallow Them All, and It's Just Like Smack": Comorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Imagining Moral Agency alongside Methadone and Antipsychotics

Michael d'Arcy
{"title":"\"Swallow Them All, and It's Just Like Smack\": Comorbidity, Polypharmacy, and Imagining Moral Agency alongside Methadone and Antipsychotics","authors":"Michael d'Arcy","doi":"10.17157/mat.10.1.6917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research article investigates moral agency in the spaces between the methadone clinic and the inpatient psychiatric ward by exploring the ways dually-diagnosed service users move though ever-more labyrinthine networks of care. I ask: how are patients’ own engagements with the ethical stakes of such care both made possible and delimited by virtue of their proximity to substances that are understood to affect their subjectivities, wills, and capacities for self-governance? Drawing on fieldwork in the community mental health network of Dublin, Ireland, and following my interlocutors’ own reflections, I analyse the moral dimensions of polypharmaceutical treatment for substance use disorder in the context of psychiatric dual diagnosis. I illustrate how various apparatuses of coercion and care apprehend and govern patients who are thought to be both addicted and mad, simultaneously enthralled by one form of the pharmakon and dangerously unreasonable when other medications are absent or neglected. In the space of such medicated subjectivities, a curious but ultimately revelatory claim to authority about the intended and unintended effects of polypharmaceutical treatment takes shape. ","PeriodicalId":74160,"journal":{"name":"Medicine anthropology theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine anthropology theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17157/mat.10.1.6917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research article investigates moral agency in the spaces between the methadone clinic and the inpatient psychiatric ward by exploring the ways dually-diagnosed service users move though ever-more labyrinthine networks of care. I ask: how are patients’ own engagements with the ethical stakes of such care both made possible and delimited by virtue of their proximity to substances that are understood to affect their subjectivities, wills, and capacities for self-governance? Drawing on fieldwork in the community mental health network of Dublin, Ireland, and following my interlocutors’ own reflections, I analyse the moral dimensions of polypharmaceutical treatment for substance use disorder in the context of psychiatric dual diagnosis. I illustrate how various apparatuses of coercion and care apprehend and govern patients who are thought to be both addicted and mad, simultaneously enthralled by one form of the pharmakon and dangerously unreasonable when other medications are absent or neglected. In the space of such medicated subjectivities, a curious but ultimately revelatory claim to authority about the intended and unintended effects of polypharmaceutical treatment takes shape. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“吞下它们,就像毒品一样”:共病,多种药物,以及美沙酮和抗精神病药物的道德代理想象
这篇研究文章通过探索双重诊断的服务使用者在越来越错综复杂的护理网络中的行为方式,调查了美沙酮诊所和住院精神科病房之间的道德代理。我想问:由于患者接近的物质被认为会影响他们的主观能动性、意志和自我治理能力,他们自己如何参与这种护理的道德利害关系?根据爱尔兰都柏林社区心理健康网络的实地调查,并根据我的对话者自己的思考,我分析了在精神双重诊断的背景下,药物使用障碍的多药治疗的道德层面。我展示了各种胁迫和护理手段是如何逮捕和控制那些被认为既上瘾又疯狂的患者的,他们同时被一种形式的药物迷住了,当其他药物不存在或被忽视时,他们是危险的不合理。在这种药物主观性的空间里,一种关于多种药物治疗的预期和非预期效果的奇怪但最终具有启示性的权威主张形成了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mapping Microbial Selves: Field Notes from a Dirty Parenting Project Relations as Immunity: Building Community Resilience How to Categorise Disease? Endometriosis, Inflammation, and ‘Self Out of Place’ The Immune System, Immunity and Immune Logics: Troubling Fixed Boundaries and (Re)conceptualizing Relations Pandemic Life-lines: A Multimodal Autoethnography of COVID-19 Illness, Isolation, and Shared Immunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1