“The knife needs the intention of the heart” The construction of ethnic and moral boundaries in Israeli slaughterhouses

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Ethnicities Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI:10.1177/14687968221093715
Anat Ben-Yonatan
{"title":"“The knife needs the intention of the heart” The construction of ethnic and moral boundaries in Israeli slaughterhouses","authors":"Anat Ben-Yonatan","doi":"10.1177/14687968221093715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines aspects of ethnic, religious, and moral boundary work among Jewish-Israeli kosher slaughterers based, on 35 in-depth interviews, four ethnographic observations, informal conversations, and other secondary sources such as video footage of the slaughter sites gathered between 2014 and 2019. In Israel, the self-proclaimed sovereign homeland of the Jewish people, being Jewish means being part of the political, ethnic, and religious hegemony. While being stigmatized for doing dirty work, the Jewish slaughterers’ workplace setting groups them with menial laborers from a minority ethnic group, both physically and organizationally. The stigma associated with animal killing in Israel encourages the slaughterers to distinguish themselves from other workers by engaging in boundary work. Within the workplace setting, this boundary work occurs around various aspects of intersecting identities: racio-ethnic, national, religious, and professional. Furthermore, this boundary work is fueled by various organizational mechanisms such as the slaughter site’s spatial architecture, differential wage structure, and the use of tools and technologies. While these workplace conditions are determined by the employers, they are constantly restructured and reinforced by the slaughterers to assert their moral superiority vis-a-vis other workers. While exploring these organizational mechanisms, I conceptualize the Jewish slaughter knife as a boundary-maintaining object. I claim that the slaughterers constantly leverage these material, symbolic, and discursive resources to morally segregate the two workers’ groups and the morally tainted aspects of slaughter, such as violence and cruelty, to the ‘Arab’ others. Meanwhile, the prevailing Jew–Arab tensions and the popular symbolic representation of the Arabs ensures that these behaviors are treated as an inherent racio-ethnic trait, thereby reinforcing these boundaries.","PeriodicalId":47512,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221093715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines aspects of ethnic, religious, and moral boundary work among Jewish-Israeli kosher slaughterers based, on 35 in-depth interviews, four ethnographic observations, informal conversations, and other secondary sources such as video footage of the slaughter sites gathered between 2014 and 2019. In Israel, the self-proclaimed sovereign homeland of the Jewish people, being Jewish means being part of the political, ethnic, and religious hegemony. While being stigmatized for doing dirty work, the Jewish slaughterers’ workplace setting groups them with menial laborers from a minority ethnic group, both physically and organizationally. The stigma associated with animal killing in Israel encourages the slaughterers to distinguish themselves from other workers by engaging in boundary work. Within the workplace setting, this boundary work occurs around various aspects of intersecting identities: racio-ethnic, national, religious, and professional. Furthermore, this boundary work is fueled by various organizational mechanisms such as the slaughter site’s spatial architecture, differential wage structure, and the use of tools and technologies. While these workplace conditions are determined by the employers, they are constantly restructured and reinforced by the slaughterers to assert their moral superiority vis-a-vis other workers. While exploring these organizational mechanisms, I conceptualize the Jewish slaughter knife as a boundary-maintaining object. I claim that the slaughterers constantly leverage these material, symbolic, and discursive resources to morally segregate the two workers’ groups and the morally tainted aspects of slaughter, such as violence and cruelty, to the ‘Arab’ others. Meanwhile, the prevailing Jew–Arab tensions and the popular symbolic representation of the Arabs ensures that these behaviors are treated as an inherent racio-ethnic trait, thereby reinforcing these boundaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“刀需心之意”以色列屠宰场种族与道德界限的建构
本研究基于35次深度访谈、4次人种学观察、非正式谈话以及2014年至2019年期间收集的屠宰现场视频等其他二手资料,研究了犹太-以色列犹太人屠杀者在种族、宗教和道德边界方面的工作。在犹太人自封的主权国家以色列,成为犹太人意味着成为政治、种族和宗教霸权的一部分。虽然犹太人被认为从事肮脏的工作,但他们在工作场所的环境将他们与少数民族的卑微劳动者相提并论,无论是在身体上还是在组织上。在以色列,与动物杀戮有关的耻辱促使屠宰者通过从事边界工作来将自己与其他工人区分开来。在工作场所环境中,这种边界工作发生在交叉身份的各个方面:种族-民族,国家,宗教和专业。此外,这种边界工作受到各种组织机制的推动,如屠宰场的空间建筑、不同的工资结构、工具和技术的使用。虽然这些工作场所的条件是由雇主决定的,但屠宰者不断调整和加强这些条件,以维护他们相对于其他工人的道德优越感。在探索这些组织机制的过程中,我将犹太人的屠刀概念化为一种维持边界的物体。我声称,屠杀者不断地利用这些物质、象征和话语资源,在道德上隔离两个工人群体,并将屠杀的道德污点方面(如暴力和残忍)隔离给“阿拉伯”其他人。同时,普遍存在的犹太人与阿拉伯人的紧张关系和阿拉伯人的普遍象征性代表确保了这些行为被视为固有的种族-民族特征,从而加强了这些界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnicities
Ethnicities ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: There is currently a burgeoning interest in both sociology and politics around questions of ethnicity, nationalism and related issues such as identity politics and minority rights. Ethnicities is a cross-disciplinary journal that will provide a critical dialogue between these debates in sociology and politics, and related disciplines. Ethnicities has three broad aims, each of which adds a new and distinctive dimension to the academic analysis of ethnicity, nationalism, identity politics and minority rights.
期刊最新文献
Forgotten responsibilities? Nordic truth commissions, Sámi history, and the difficulty of transnational perspectives on historical responsibility Multicultural conversations: The nature and future of culture, identity and nationalism Linguistic landscape as a tool of identity negotiation: The case of the Nepali ethnic communities in West Bengal Discrimination and rights in German naturalization policy Who counts? Anti-antisemitism and the racial politics of emotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1