Foreign Language Anxiety and Self-Efficacy: Intermediate Korean as a Foreign Language Learners

Min Jung Jee
{"title":"Foreign Language Anxiety and Self-Efficacy: Intermediate Korean as a Foreign Language Learners","authors":"Min Jung Jee","doi":"10.30961/lr.2019.55.2.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the foreign language anxiety (FLA) and foreign language (FL) self-efficacy of learners of intermediate Korean as a foreign language (KFL), in relation to four language skills (i.e., speaking, listening, reading, and writing). Forty-one KFL students, enrolled in Second-year and Third-year level Korean courses at a university in Australia, completed an online questionnaire. The findings suggested that these students had moderate levels of FLA ( M =2.78), especially regarding speaking ( M =3.16) and listening ( M =3.09). The students also showed high levels of self-efficacy in listening ( M =3.66) and speaking ( M =3.36). Positive correlations were found between FLA and the four skill-specific anxieties, with negative correlations between FLA and levels of self-efficacy in the four specific skills. Speaking self-efficacy was found to be the best predictor of FLA, and a lack of knowledge of Korean was revealed to be the major source of anxiety across all four skills. The students also felt confident when performing routine class activities.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2019.55.2.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study examined the foreign language anxiety (FLA) and foreign language (FL) self-efficacy of learners of intermediate Korean as a foreign language (KFL), in relation to four language skills (i.e., speaking, listening, reading, and writing). Forty-one KFL students, enrolled in Second-year and Third-year level Korean courses at a university in Australia, completed an online questionnaire. The findings suggested that these students had moderate levels of FLA ( M =2.78), especially regarding speaking ( M =3.16) and listening ( M =3.09). The students also showed high levels of self-efficacy in listening ( M =3.66) and speaking ( M =3.36). Positive correlations were found between FLA and the four skill-specific anxieties, with negative correlations between FLA and levels of self-efficacy in the four specific skills. Speaking self-efficacy was found to be the best predictor of FLA, and a lack of knowledge of Korean was revealed to be the major source of anxiety across all four skills. The students also felt confident when performing routine class activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外语焦虑与自我效能感:作为外语学习者的中级韩语
本研究考察了中级韩语作为外语学习者的外语焦虑(FLA)和外语自我效能感(FL)与四种语言技能(即听、说、读、写)的关系。在澳大利亚一所大学就读韩国语2年级和3年级的41名韩国外国语学院学生完成了在线问卷调查。研究结果表明,这些学生的FLA水平中等(M =2.78),特别是在口语(M =3.16)和听力(M =3.09)方面。学生在听力(M =3.66)和口语(M =3.36)方面也表现出较高的自我效能感。主观主观感受与四种特定技能焦虑呈正相关,与四种特定技能的自我效能水平呈负相关。语言自我效能感被发现是FLA的最佳预测指标,而韩语知识的缺乏被发现是所有四种技能中焦虑的主要来源。学生们在进行日常的课堂活动时也感到自信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Causative Projections in Mandarin Chinese Chinese Word Order and the Two Typological “Exceptions”: A Scalar Approach On the Syntax of Unusual Subjects: Exceptional Case Marking Constructions Exploring VP/vP Preposing in Multiple Nominative Constructions A Case Study on English Test Item Development Training for Secondary School Teachers Using AI Tools: Focusing on ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1