Jakob Böhme und das Böse

Q4 Arts and Humanities Aither Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.5507/aither.2020.014
Martin Žemla
{"title":"Jakob Böhme und das Böse","authors":"Martin Žemla","doi":"10.5507/aither.2020.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2020.014 AbsTRACT* One of the central topics of Jakob Böhme (1575–1624) is the problem of evil. In contrast to the Neoplatonic tradition, which has inspired much of the Christian theology, he does not believe that evil can be explained simply as a deficiency of good. His innovative notion of „Ungrund“ (the Divine „Abyss“) has grown out of his strong belief that both has to be maintained: God is Good and evil is something real. Now, his fundamental question is: How is it possible that good and omnipotent God created the world in such a way that there can be evil in it? In this paper, I follow up the ancient, and more specifically, the Neoplatonic, concepts of the first principle. I try to understand why the divine being, the One, could have been called „good“, and what it meant for the concept of evil. In this perspective, I analyze the innovative approach to evil, as it was developed by Böhme. Although his „Ungrund“ is beyond good and evil, he explains that, and in which way, the metaphysical source of evil must be present already there.","PeriodicalId":36348,"journal":{"name":"Aither","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aither","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2020.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2020.014 AbsTRACT* One of the central topics of Jakob Böhme (1575–1624) is the problem of evil. In contrast to the Neoplatonic tradition, which has inspired much of the Christian theology, he does not believe that evil can be explained simply as a deficiency of good. His innovative notion of „Ungrund“ (the Divine „Abyss“) has grown out of his strong belief that both has to be maintained: God is Good and evil is something real. Now, his fundamental question is: How is it possible that good and omnipotent God created the world in such a way that there can be evil in it? In this paper, I follow up the ancient, and more specifically, the Neoplatonic, concepts of the first principle. I try to understand why the divine being, the One, could have been called „good“, and what it meant for the concept of evil. In this perspective, I analyze the innovative approach to evil, as it was developed by Böhme. Although his „Ungrund“ is beyond good and evil, he explains that, and in which way, the metaphysical source of evil must be present already there.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jakob Böhme与邪恶
https://doi.org/10.5507/aither.2020.014摘要*雅各布·伯姆(1575-1624)的中心话题之一是邪恶问题。与启发了基督教神学的新柏拉图传统相反,他不认为邪恶可以简单地解释为善的缺失。他对“Ungrund”(神圣的“深渊”)的创新理念他坚信两者都必须得到维护:上帝是善良的,邪恶是真实的。现在,他的根本问题是:善良而无所不能的上帝怎么可能以这样一种方式创造了这个世界,其中可能有邪恶?在这篇论文中,我继承了古代的,更具体地说,新柏拉图主义的,第一原则的概念。我试图理解为什么神圣的存在,即“一”,可以被称为“善”,以及它对邪恶的概念意味着什么。从这个角度来看,我分析了Böhme发展的对邪恶的创新方法。尽管他的“Ungrund”超越了善和恶,但他解释说,以这种方式,邪恶的形而上学来源必须已经存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aither
Aither Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Aristotle on Pain: Pain as hindering the energeia in Nicomachean Ethics Epistemological Issues in Puente Hurtado de Mendoza's Early De fide Review: Aiste Celkyte, The Stoic Theory of Beauty Spinoza: The God-Intoxicated "Atheist" Epistemological Issues in Puente Hurtado de Mendoza's Early De fide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1