Incorporating creativity in science and mathematics teaching:

Astrid Johansen, Erik Mogstad, Bojana Gajic, Berit Bungum
{"title":"Incorporating creativity in science and mathematics teaching:","authors":"Astrid Johansen, Erik Mogstad, Bojana Gajic, Berit Bungum","doi":"10.5617/nordina.8620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although creativity constitutes part of 21st century skills, realizing a curriculum that emphasizes creativity in science and mathematics appears to be a challenge. In this study, we investigate how lower secondary science and mathematics teachers understand the concept of creativity, how it can be promoted, and what hinders creativity in schools. Eight teachers were involved in the study, and their views were investigated through group interviews. It was revealed that teachers adopt three perspectives pertaining to how creativity can be fostered in the classroom: the nature of tasks and how they are presented and organized, the need for background knowledge, and the requirement of a supportive classroom environment. A major concern for teachers was how creativity could form part of the assessment process, since assessment systems influence what occurs in the classroom. Further, school cultures that emphasize objectivity and documentability tend to result in teachers prioritizing convergent thinking and the reproduction of knowledge, preventing the inclusion of creativity in teaching. The core values and principles for learning stated in the new curriculum introduced in Norway in 2020 include that students should experience the joy of creating, engagement, and the urge to explore. The results indicate that assessment dilemmas are the main obstacles in the realization of these intentions.","PeriodicalId":37114,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.8620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although creativity constitutes part of 21st century skills, realizing a curriculum that emphasizes creativity in science and mathematics appears to be a challenge. In this study, we investigate how lower secondary science and mathematics teachers understand the concept of creativity, how it can be promoted, and what hinders creativity in schools. Eight teachers were involved in the study, and their views were investigated through group interviews. It was revealed that teachers adopt three perspectives pertaining to how creativity can be fostered in the classroom: the nature of tasks and how they are presented and organized, the need for background knowledge, and the requirement of a supportive classroom environment. A major concern for teachers was how creativity could form part of the assessment process, since assessment systems influence what occurs in the classroom. Further, school cultures that emphasize objectivity and documentability tend to result in teachers prioritizing convergent thinking and the reproduction of knowledge, preventing the inclusion of creativity in teaching. The core values and principles for learning stated in the new curriculum introduced in Norway in 2020 include that students should experience the joy of creating, engagement, and the urge to explore. The results indicate that assessment dilemmas are the main obstacles in the realization of these intentions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在科学和数学教学中融入创造性:
尽管创造力是21世纪技能的一部分,但实现一个强调科学和数学创造力的课程似乎是一个挑战。在这项研究中,我们调查了初中科学和数学教师如何理解创造力的概念,如何促进创造力,以及是什么阻碍了学校的创造力。八名教师参与了这项研究,并通过小组访谈调查了他们的观点。研究表明,教师对如何在课堂上培养创造力采取了三种观点:任务的性质以及任务的呈现和组织方式、对背景知识的需求以及对支持性课堂环境的要求。教师们主要关心的是创造力如何成为评估过程的一部分,因为评估系统会影响课堂上发生的事情。此外,强调客观性和可记录性的学校文化往往会导致教师优先考虑趋同思维和知识的再现,从而阻碍创造性融入教学。挪威2020年推出的新课程中阐述的核心价值观和学习原则包括,学生应该体验到创造、参与和探索的乐趣。结果表明,评估困境是实现这些意图的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Science Education
Nordic Studies in Science Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Sammenhengen mellom utforskende undervisning i naturfag og elevers prestasjoner og interesse for og trivsel med naturvitenskap. Norske resultater fra PISA 2015. Quantum physical insights of agential realism within new materialism in science education: Lower secondary school students’ conversations when constructing representations of plate boundaries in Minecraft Matriser, krafter och fysik: Elevers levda erfarenheter av bedömningsmatriser i grundskolans fysikundervisning En kritisk diskusjon av ‘tematisk analyse etter Braun og Clarke (2006)’ i naturfagdidaktiske studier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1