Creating and Evaluating Chatbots as Eligibility Assistants for Clinical Trials

C. Chuan, Susan Morgan
{"title":"Creating and Evaluating Chatbots as Eligibility Assistants for Clinical Trials","authors":"C. Chuan, Susan Morgan","doi":"10.1145/3403575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical trials are important tools to improve knowledge about the effectiveness of new treatments for all diseases, including cancers. However, studies show that fewer than 5% of cancer patients are enrolled in any type of research study or clinical trial. Although there is a wide variety of reasons for the low participation rate, we address this issue by designing a chatbot to help users determine their eligibility via interactive, two-way communication. The chatbot is supported by a user-centered classifier that uses an active deep learning approach to separate complex eligibility criteria into questions that can be easily answered by users and information that requires verification by their doctors. We collected all the available clinical trial eligibility criteria from the National Cancer Institute's website to evaluate the chatbot and the classifier. Experimental results show that the active deep learning classifier outperforms the baseline k-nearest neighbor method. In addition, an in-person experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the chatbot. The results indicate that the participants who used the chatbot achieved better understanding about eligibility than those who used only the website. Furthermore, interfaces with chatbots were rated significantly better in terms of perceived usability, interactivity, and dialogue.","PeriodicalId":72043,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","volume":"2 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3403575","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM transactions on computing for healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3403575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Clinical trials are important tools to improve knowledge about the effectiveness of new treatments for all diseases, including cancers. However, studies show that fewer than 5% of cancer patients are enrolled in any type of research study or clinical trial. Although there is a wide variety of reasons for the low participation rate, we address this issue by designing a chatbot to help users determine their eligibility via interactive, two-way communication. The chatbot is supported by a user-centered classifier that uses an active deep learning approach to separate complex eligibility criteria into questions that can be easily answered by users and information that requires verification by their doctors. We collected all the available clinical trial eligibility criteria from the National Cancer Institute's website to evaluate the chatbot and the classifier. Experimental results show that the active deep learning classifier outperforms the baseline k-nearest neighbor method. In addition, an in-person experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the chatbot. The results indicate that the participants who used the chatbot achieved better understanding about eligibility than those who used only the website. Furthermore, interfaces with chatbots were rated significantly better in terms of perceived usability, interactivity, and dialogue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创建和评估聊天机器人作为临床试验的合格助手
临床试验是提高对包括癌症在内的所有疾病的新疗法有效性的认识的重要工具。然而,研究表明,只有不到5%的癌症患者参加了任何类型的研究或临床试验。虽然参与率低的原因有很多,但我们通过设计一个聊天机器人来解决这个问题,帮助用户通过交互式的双向沟通来确定他们的资格。聊天机器人由以用户为中心的分类器支持,该分类器使用主动深度学习方法将复杂的资格标准分离为用户可以轻松回答的问题和需要医生验证的信息。我们从国家癌症研究所的网站上收集了所有可用的临床试验资格标准来评估聊天机器人和分类器。实验结果表明,主动深度学习分类器优于基线k近邻方法。此外,还进行了面对面的实验来评估聊天机器人的有效性。结果表明,使用聊天机器人的参与者比只使用网站的参与者对资格有更好的理解。此外,与聊天机器人的界面在感知可用性、交互性和对话方面的评分明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A method for comparing time series by untangling time-dependent and independent variations in biological processes AI-assisted Diagnosing, Monitoring, and Treatment of Mental Disorders: A Survey HEalthRecordBERT (HERBERT): leveraging transformers on electronic health records for chronic kidney disease risk stratification iScan: Detection of Colorectal Cancer From CT Scan Images Using Deep Learning A Computation Model to Estimate Interaction Intensity through Non-verbal Behavioral Cues: A Case Study of Intimate Couples under the Impact of Acute Alcohol Consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1