{"title":"From then till now: changing data collection methods in single crystal X-ray crystallography since 1912","authors":"H. Powell","doi":"10.1080/0889311X.2019.1615483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The principal method used today for single crystal X-ray data collection is the Arndt–Wonacott screenless rotation method formalized in the late 1970s, but the physical hardware used now would be barely recognizable to scientists at that time. However, the technique of rotating a crystal around a single goniostat axis, illuminating it with monochromatic radiation, and collecting the data on a flat detector is identical. Indeed, this would not have been very surprising to the pioneers of X-ray crystallography early in the Twentieth Century, since the elements of this method were available in the early days of the science. In a sense, therefore, we have come full circle after utilizing a variety of different experimental methods and equipment, and the question arises; ‘how did we get here?’; after all, there were long periods in our science where we used point detectors or curved area detectors, or using polychromatic X-rays and stationary crystals. This review was originally presented at ECM31 in Oviedo, Spain in August 2018 under the title `Vagando entre los picos ¿cómo llegué hastaaquí? Improving methods in data collection and processing’; the Spanish texttranslates as ‘Wandering amongst the peaks – how did I get here?’.","PeriodicalId":54385,"journal":{"name":"Crystallography Reviews","volume":"25 1","pages":"264 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0889311X.2019.1615483","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crystallography Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0889311X.2019.1615483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRYSTALLOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT The principal method used today for single crystal X-ray data collection is the Arndt–Wonacott screenless rotation method formalized in the late 1970s, but the physical hardware used now would be barely recognizable to scientists at that time. However, the technique of rotating a crystal around a single goniostat axis, illuminating it with monochromatic radiation, and collecting the data on a flat detector is identical. Indeed, this would not have been very surprising to the pioneers of X-ray crystallography early in the Twentieth Century, since the elements of this method were available in the early days of the science. In a sense, therefore, we have come full circle after utilizing a variety of different experimental methods and equipment, and the question arises; ‘how did we get here?’; after all, there were long periods in our science where we used point detectors or curved area detectors, or using polychromatic X-rays and stationary crystals. This review was originally presented at ECM31 in Oviedo, Spain in August 2018 under the title `Vagando entre los picos ¿cómo llegué hastaaquí? Improving methods in data collection and processing’; the Spanish texttranslates as ‘Wandering amongst the peaks – how did I get here?’.
目前用于单晶x射线数据收集的主要方法是20世纪70年代末形成的Arndt-Wonacott无屏幕旋转法,但现在使用的物理硬件在当时的科学家中几乎无法识别。然而,围绕单个测角器轴旋转晶体,用单色辐射照射晶体,并在平面探测器上收集数据的技术是相同的。事实上,对于二十世纪早期x射线晶体学的先驱来说,这并不奇怪,因为这种方法的要素在科学的早期就已经存在了。因此,从某种意义上说,我们在使用了各种不同的实验方法和设备后又兜了一个圈,问题出现了;“我们是怎么到这儿来的?”毕竟,在我们的科学中有很长一段时间,我们使用点探测器或弯曲区域探测器,或使用多色x射线和固定晶体。本综述最初于2018年8月在西班牙奥维耶多举行的ECM31上发表,标题为“Vagando entre los picos¿cómo lleggu hastaaquí?”改进数据收集和处理方法;西班牙文翻译过来是“徘徊在山峰之间——我是如何到达这里的?”
期刊介绍:
Crystallography Reviews publishes English language reviews on topics in crystallography and crystal growth, covering all theoretical and applied aspects of biological, chemical, industrial, mineralogical and physical crystallography. The intended readership is the crystallographic community at large, as well as scientists working in related fields of interest. It is hoped that the articles will be accessible to all these, and not just specialists in each topic. Full reviews are typically 20 to 80 journal pages long with hundreds of references and the journal also welcomes shorter topical, book, historical, evaluation, biographical, data and key issues reviews.