Non-mass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Characterization with BI-RADS Descriptors and ADC Values

W. Buchberger, W. Oberaigner, C. Kremser, K. Gautsch, U. Siebert
{"title":"Non-mass Enhancement in Breast MRI: Characterization with BI-RADS Descriptors and ADC Values","authors":"W. Buchberger, W. Oberaigner, C. Kremser, K. Gautsch, U. Siebert","doi":"10.28991/SCIMEDJ-2021-0302-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing benign from malignant non-mass-like breast lesions. Methods: 103 lesions showing non-mass-like enhancement in 100 consecutive patients were analyzed. Distribution, internal enhancement patterns, and contrast kinetic curve patterns were classified according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained from manually placed regions of interest (ROIs) on diffusion-weighted images. The optimal ADC value threshold for the distinction between benign and malignant lesions was determined by ROC analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of malignancy, and the probability of malignancy was calculated for various combinations of findings. Histological diagnosis obtained by means of core needle biopsy was used as gold standard. Results: According to the univariate and multivariate analysis, odds ratios for malignancy were significantly elevated for clumped or clustered ring internal enhancement and low ADC values (p < 0.001), whereas distribution patterns and contrast kinetic patterns were not significantly correlated with benignity or malignancy. In non-mass lesions with homogeneous or heterogeneous internal enhancement and ADC values greater than 1.26×10-3mm2/s, no malignancy was detected, while all other combinations of findings had a probability of malignancy ranging from 22.2 to 76.6%. Conclusions: A combination of BI-RADS descriptors of internal enhancement and ADC values is useful for the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-mass enhancement. Lesions with homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement and high ADC can be followed up, while all other lesions should be biopsied. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0302-1 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":74776,"journal":{"name":"SciMedicine journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciMedicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/SCIMEDJ-2021-0302-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in distinguishing benign from malignant non-mass-like breast lesions. Methods: 103 lesions showing non-mass-like enhancement in 100 consecutive patients were analyzed. Distribution, internal enhancement patterns, and contrast kinetic curve patterns were classified according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained from manually placed regions of interest (ROIs) on diffusion-weighted images. The optimal ADC value threshold for the distinction between benign and malignant lesions was determined by ROC analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of malignancy, and the probability of malignancy was calculated for various combinations of findings. Histological diagnosis obtained by means of core needle biopsy was used as gold standard. Results: According to the univariate and multivariate analysis, odds ratios for malignancy were significantly elevated for clumped or clustered ring internal enhancement and low ADC values (p < 0.001), whereas distribution patterns and contrast kinetic patterns were not significantly correlated with benignity or malignancy. In non-mass lesions with homogeneous or heterogeneous internal enhancement and ADC values greater than 1.26×10-3mm2/s, no malignancy was detected, while all other combinations of findings had a probability of malignancy ranging from 22.2 to 76.6%. Conclusions: A combination of BI-RADS descriptors of internal enhancement and ADC values is useful for the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-mass enhancement. Lesions with homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement and high ADC can be followed up, while all other lesions should be biopsied. Doi: 10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0302-1 Full Text: PDF
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺MRI中的非肿块增强:BI-RADS描述符和ADC值的表征
目的:本研究的目的是评估增强磁共振成像和扩散加权成像在区分良性和恶性非肿块样乳腺病变方面的准确性。方法:对连续100例患者中103个表现为非肿块样增强的病灶进行分析。根据BI-RADS词典对分布、内部增强模式和对比动力学曲线模式进行分类。表观扩散系数(ADC)值是从扩散加权图像上手动放置的感兴趣区域(ROI)获得的。通过ROC分析确定区分良恶性病变的最佳ADC值阈值。进行单变量和多变量分析以确定恶性肿瘤的独立预测因素,并计算各种结果组合的恶性肿瘤概率。通过核心针活检获得的组织学诊断被用作金标准。结果:根据单变量和多变量分析,聚集性或聚集性环内增强和低ADC值的恶性比值比显著升高(p<0.001),而分布模式和对比动力学模式与良恶性无显著相关性。在内部增强均匀或不均匀且ADC值大于1.26×10-3mm2/s的非肿块性病变中未检测到恶性肿瘤,而所有其他组合的结果都有22.2-76.6%的恶性概率。结论:内部增强的BI-RADS描述符和ADC值的组合有助于鉴别诊断非肿块增强的病变。可以对均匀或不均匀增强和ADC高的病变进行随访,而所有其他病变都应进行活检。Doi:10.28991/SciMedJ-2021-0302-1全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study on Prediction of Survival Event of Heart Failure Patients Using Machine Learning and Statistical Algorithms Systematic Review on the Effects of Food on Mental Health via Gut Microbiome Giant Fungating Borderline Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast Community Preparedness, Acceptability, and Uptake of UTT Services in PHC Facilities Effect of Season on Blood Transfusion Patterns: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1