Cognitive Ability of Nursing Students Anchored in Outcomes-Based Education

Steve M. Esteban
{"title":"Cognitive Ability of Nursing Students Anchored in Outcomes-Based Education","authors":"Steve M. Esteban","doi":"10.47750/jett.2023.14.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) demands Higher Educations to adopt an up-to-date curriculum, innovative programs and align student skills according to the manpower needs of the modern society. Countries employed the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) curriculum to ensure that their professionals uphold the expected third-world competencies. This study is sought to assess the cognitive skills and perception of the first-year nursing students in Isabela State University anchored to the OBE Curriculum of the 4IR. Mixed - method research approach was used to identify their perceptions of the OBE and assess their cognitive abilities. Simple Random Sampling Technique was used to select 51 participants. The adoption of the program showed an “Average” result in the learner’s mastery level. The subject Theoretical Foundation of Nursing (TFN) was substantiated to be the easiest subject taken by the learners out of the 8 Professional Subjects where test questions were mainly categorized as “Lower-Order-Thinking Skills”. On the other hand, Microbiology & Parasitology, where “Higher-Order-Thinking Skills” questions were assigned was found to be the most difficult. Their profile variable had no significant attribute to their cognitive abilities. Perceptively, most (36) learners had no idea about the nature and implementation of the OBE curriculum where the concurrent nursing program is integrated. Since factors were attributed to students, facilitators, and the OBE curriculum espousal, the abovementioned curriculum adoption and implementation need to be reinforced to meet the intended competencies of the modern global industrialization. Further studies need to be conducted that is aimed at scholarly enhancing the curriculum.","PeriodicalId":41419,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.03.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR) demands Higher Educations to adopt an up-to-date curriculum, innovative programs and align student skills according to the manpower needs of the modern society. Countries employed the Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) curriculum to ensure that their professionals uphold the expected third-world competencies. This study is sought to assess the cognitive skills and perception of the first-year nursing students in Isabela State University anchored to the OBE Curriculum of the 4IR. Mixed - method research approach was used to identify their perceptions of the OBE and assess their cognitive abilities. Simple Random Sampling Technique was used to select 51 participants. The adoption of the program showed an “Average” result in the learner’s mastery level. The subject Theoretical Foundation of Nursing (TFN) was substantiated to be the easiest subject taken by the learners out of the 8 Professional Subjects where test questions were mainly categorized as “Lower-Order-Thinking Skills”. On the other hand, Microbiology & Parasitology, where “Higher-Order-Thinking Skills” questions were assigned was found to be the most difficult. Their profile variable had no significant attribute to their cognitive abilities. Perceptively, most (36) learners had no idea about the nature and implementation of the OBE curriculum where the concurrent nursing program is integrated. Since factors were attributed to students, facilitators, and the OBE curriculum espousal, the abovementioned curriculum adoption and implementation need to be reinforced to meet the intended competencies of the modern global industrialization. Further studies need to be conducted that is aimed at scholarly enhancing the curriculum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结果导向教育对护生认知能力的影响
第四次工业革命(4IR)要求高等教育采用最新的课程、创新的项目,并根据现代社会的人力需求调整学生的技能。各国采用基于成果的教育(OBE)课程,以确保其专业人员保持预期的第三世界能力。本研究旨在评估伊莎贝拉州立大学一年级护理专业学生的认知技能和感知能力,并与第四次工业革命的OBE课程相结合。本研究采用混合方法研究方法,以确定他们对出窍的知觉,并评估他们的认知能力。采用简单随机抽样法,选取51名参与者。采用该计划后,学习者的掌握水平达到了“平均”水平。在8个以“低阶思维技能”为主的专业科目中,护理理论基础(TFN)是学习者最容易学习的科目。另一方面,微生物学和寄生虫学,其中“高阶思维技能”的问题被发现是最难的。他们的轮廓变量对他们的认知能力没有显著的属性。从知觉上看,大多数(36)学习者不了解OBE课程的性质和实施,其中整合了并行护理计划。由于因素归因于学生、促进者和OBE课程的支持,因此需要加强上述课程的采用和实施,以满足现代全球工业化的预期能力。需要进行进一步的研究,以提高课程的学术水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers
Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Level of Teachers of the d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing to Develop Phonological Awareness of Students with Cochlear Implants An Investigation into Management Styles and Creative Leadership Characteristics of School Administrators Enhancing mathematics word problems for young learners using storytelling pedagogy Approaches to the potential of orchestration and arranging techniques in music education: what can be done with a school song? Inclusive Educational Review of Software Architectural Styles and Patterns for the Students of the College of Information and Computing Sciences of Cagayan State University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1