Neotectonic mountain uplift and geomorphology

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Geomorfologiya Pub Date : 2019-11-08 DOI:10.31857/s0435-4281201943-26
C. Ollier, К Д Оллиер, C. Pain, К Ф Пайн
{"title":"Neotectonic mountain uplift and geomorphology","authors":"C. Ollier, К Д Оллиер, C. Pain, К Ф Пайн","doi":"10.31857/s0435-4281201943-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mountains are topographic features caused by erosion after vertical uplift or mountain building. Mountain building is often confused with orogeny, which today means the formation of structures in fold belts. The common assumption that folding and mountain building go together is generally untrue. Many mountains occur in unfolded rocks, granites and volcanic rocks, so there is no direct association of folding and mountain building. In those places where mountains are underlain by folded rocks the folding pre-dates planation and uplift. The age of mountains is therefore not the age of the last folding (if any) but the age of vertical uplift. Since mountains are not restricted to folded rocks, lateral compression is not required to explain the uplift. \nA compilation of times of uplift of mountains around the world shows that a major phase of tectonic uplift started about 6 Ma, and much uplift occurred in the last 2 Ma. This period is known as the Neotectonic Period. It is a global phenomenon including mountains on passive continental margins, and those in deep continental interiors. Several hypotheses of mountain building have problems with this timing. Some fail by being only able to make mountains out of folded rock at continental margins. Many translate the vertical uplift into lateral compression, but vertical uplift alone can create mountains. \nThe Neotectonic Period has important implications for geomorphology, climate and global tectonics. In geomorphology it does not fit into conventional theories of geomorphology such as Davisian or King cycles of erosion. Neotectonic uplift might initiate several cycles of erosion, but most planation surfaces are much older than the Neotectonic Period. The increasing relief associated with Neotectonic uplift affected rates of erosion and sedimentation, and also late Cenozoic climate. \nThe Neotectonic Period does not fit within plate tectonics theory, in which mountains are explained as a result of compression at active margins: mountains in other locations are said to have been caused by the same process but further back in time. This is disproved by the young age of uplift of mountains in intercontinental and passive margin positions. Subduction is supposed to have been continuous for hundreds of millions of years, so fails to explain the world-wide uplifts in just a few million years. \nGeomorphologists should be guided by their own findings, and refrain from theory-driven hypotheses of plate collision or landscape evolution.","PeriodicalId":35940,"journal":{"name":"Geomorfologiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomorfologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s0435-4281201943-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Mountains are topographic features caused by erosion after vertical uplift or mountain building. Mountain building is often confused with orogeny, which today means the formation of structures in fold belts. The common assumption that folding and mountain building go together is generally untrue. Many mountains occur in unfolded rocks, granites and volcanic rocks, so there is no direct association of folding and mountain building. In those places where mountains are underlain by folded rocks the folding pre-dates planation and uplift. The age of mountains is therefore not the age of the last folding (if any) but the age of vertical uplift. Since mountains are not restricted to folded rocks, lateral compression is not required to explain the uplift. A compilation of times of uplift of mountains around the world shows that a major phase of tectonic uplift started about 6 Ma, and much uplift occurred in the last 2 Ma. This period is known as the Neotectonic Period. It is a global phenomenon including mountains on passive continental margins, and those in deep continental interiors. Several hypotheses of mountain building have problems with this timing. Some fail by being only able to make mountains out of folded rock at continental margins. Many translate the vertical uplift into lateral compression, but vertical uplift alone can create mountains. The Neotectonic Period has important implications for geomorphology, climate and global tectonics. In geomorphology it does not fit into conventional theories of geomorphology such as Davisian or King cycles of erosion. Neotectonic uplift might initiate several cycles of erosion, but most planation surfaces are much older than the Neotectonic Period. The increasing relief associated with Neotectonic uplift affected rates of erosion and sedimentation, and also late Cenozoic climate. The Neotectonic Period does not fit within plate tectonics theory, in which mountains are explained as a result of compression at active margins: mountains in other locations are said to have been caused by the same process but further back in time. This is disproved by the young age of uplift of mountains in intercontinental and passive margin positions. Subduction is supposed to have been continuous for hundreds of millions of years, so fails to explain the world-wide uplifts in just a few million years. Geomorphologists should be guided by their own findings, and refrain from theory-driven hypotheses of plate collision or landscape evolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新构造山隆升与地貌
山脉是垂直隆起或造山后的侵蚀形成的地形特征。造山运动常常与造山运动相混淆,造山运动在今天是指在褶皱带中构造的形成。通常认为折叠和造山是一起发生的假设通常是不正确的。许多山发生在未展开的岩石、花岗岩和火山岩中,因此褶皱和造山没有直接的联系。在那些山的下面有褶皱岩石的地方,褶皱的发生要早于夷平和隆升。因此,山脉的年龄不是最后一次褶皱的年龄(如果有的话),而是垂直隆升的年龄。由于山脉并不局限于褶皱的岩石,所以不需要侧向压缩来解释隆起。对世界各地山脉隆升时期的整理表明,构造隆升的主要阶段开始于6 Ma左右,大部分隆升发生在最近的2 Ma。这一时期被称为新构造期。这是一个全球性的现象,包括被动大陆边缘的山脉和大陆深处的山脉。一些造山假说在这个时间上存在问题。有些人失败了,因为他们只能在大陆边缘的褶皱岩石上造山。许多将垂直隆升转化为侧向压缩,但垂直隆升本身就可以形成山脉。新构造期对地貌学、气候学和全球构造学具有重要意义。在地貌学中,它不符合传统的地貌学理论,如戴维斯或金侵蚀循环。新构造隆起可能会引发几轮侵蚀,但大多数平地表面比新构造时期要古老得多。与新构造隆升有关的起伏增加影响了侵蚀和沉积速率,也影响了晚新生代气候。新构造期不符合板块构造理论,在板块构造理论中,山脉被解释为活动边缘压缩的结果:其他地方的山脉据说是由同样的过程造成的,但时间要早得多。这与洲际和被动边缘位置的山脉隆升年龄年轻相矛盾。俯冲作用被认为持续了数亿年,因此无法解释仅仅几百万年的全球隆起。地貌学家应该以他们自己的发现为指导,避免理论驱动的板块碰撞或景观演化假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomorfologiya
Geomorfologiya Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
100-ЛЕТНИЙ ЮБИЛЕЙ ВЫДАЮЩЕГОСЯ РОССИЙСКОГО УЧЕНОГО ЮРИЯ АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧА МЕЩЕРЯКОВА РУСЛОВЫЕ ПРОЦЕССЫ НА ПОЛУГОРНОЙ РЕКЕ (р. БЕЛАЯ, ЗАПАДНЫЙ КАВКАЗ) (СТ. 1. ГОРИЗОНТАЛЬНЫЕ ДЕФОРМАЦИИ РУСЛА И СТОК ВОДЫ КАК ИХ ОСНОВНОЙ ФАКТОР) ОЗЕРНО-ЛЕДНИКОВАЯ ТЕРРАСА В ИЗБОРСКО-МАЛЬСКОЙ ДОЛИНЕ: СТРОЕНИЕ, ВОЗРАСТ И МЕХАНИЗМ ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ К ИСТОРИИ ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО КАРТОГРАФИРОВАНИЯ АРКТИКИ СЛЕДЫ МОЩНОГО РЕЧНОГО СТОКА В ДОЛИНАХ РЕК БАССЕЙНА ВОЛГИ В ПОЗДНЕВАЛДАЙСКУЮ ЭПОХУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1