How librarians make decisions: the interplay of subjective and quantitative factors in the cancellation of Big Deals

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Collection and Curation Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1108/CC-05-2018-0013
Catherine A. Johnson, Samuel Cassady
{"title":"How librarians make decisions: the interplay of subjective and quantitative factors in the cancellation of Big Deals","authors":"Catherine A. Johnson, Samuel Cassady","doi":"10.1108/CC-05-2018-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe purpose of this study is to investigate the decision-making process of librarians at the University of Western Ontario who attempted to cancel the Wiley Big Deal. The aim of the study is to reveal the underlying factors that affected their decision-making process. By understanding the decision-making process of librarians, it may be possible to devise a system that takes into consideration not only quantitative factors but also the subjective or qualitative factors that impact librarians’ decisions and thus make it easier to cancel these Big Deals. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe study involved administering an online survey to 25 librarians involved in the cancellation project. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 13 of these librarians to understand at a deeper and more nuanced level the factors that influenced their decisions. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe main finding was that the librarians who participated in the study could be divided into two groups – a data-driven criteria group and a subjective criteria group – based on their ranking of the factors used to make their cancellation decisions. Most librarians interviewed used a mixture of quantitative factors and qualitative factors when making their cancellation decisions. The authors found that those participants who had greater professional experience and a closer relationship with the faculties in their subject areas had more difficulty in cancelling journals. Very few librarians relied on quantitative data alone. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis study is one of few that have examined the subjective factors that influence librarians’ decisions regarding cancellation of Big Deals. It has implications regarding the movement towards centralized collection management and reliance on quantitative data alone when making collection decisions.","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/CC-05-2018-0013","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-05-2018-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the decision-making process of librarians at the University of Western Ontario who attempted to cancel the Wiley Big Deal. The aim of the study is to reveal the underlying factors that affected their decision-making process. By understanding the decision-making process of librarians, it may be possible to devise a system that takes into consideration not only quantitative factors but also the subjective or qualitative factors that impact librarians’ decisions and thus make it easier to cancel these Big Deals. Design/methodology/approach The study involved administering an online survey to 25 librarians involved in the cancellation project. Follow-up interviews were conducted with 13 of these librarians to understand at a deeper and more nuanced level the factors that influenced their decisions. Findings The main finding was that the librarians who participated in the study could be divided into two groups – a data-driven criteria group and a subjective criteria group – based on their ranking of the factors used to make their cancellation decisions. Most librarians interviewed used a mixture of quantitative factors and qualitative factors when making their cancellation decisions. The authors found that those participants who had greater professional experience and a closer relationship with the faculties in their subject areas had more difficulty in cancelling journals. Very few librarians relied on quantitative data alone. Originality/value This study is one of few that have examined the subjective factors that influence librarians’ decisions regarding cancellation of Big Deals. It has implications regarding the movement towards centralized collection management and reliance on quantitative data alone when making collection decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆员如何决策:大交易取消中主观因素和数量因素的相互作用
目的本研究的目的是调查西安大略大学图书馆员试图取消威利大交易的决策过程。本研究的目的是揭示影响他们决策过程的潜在因素。通过了解图书馆员的决策过程,可以设计一个系统,不仅考虑数量因素,还考虑影响图书馆员决策的主观或定性因素,从而更容易取消这些大交易。设计/方法/方法这项研究涉及对参与取消项目的25名图书馆员进行在线调查。对其中13名图书馆员进行了后续采访,以更深入、更细致地了解影响他们决策的因素。研究结果主要发现,参与这项研究的图书馆员可以根据他们对做出取消决定的因素的排名,分为两组——数据驱动的标准组和主观标准组。大多数接受采访的图书馆员在做出取消决定时都使用了定量因素和定性因素的混合。作者发现,那些有更丰富专业经验、与学科领域的学院关系更密切的参与者在取消期刊方面更困难。很少有图书馆员仅仅依靠定量数据。原创性/价值本研究是少数几个研究影响图书馆员取消大额交易决定的主观因素的研究之一。它涉及到向集中收集管理的转变,以及在做出收集决策时仅依赖定量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collection and Curation
Collection and Curation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the unveiling of information-seeking anxiety among agriculture university library users Decentralisation as a marketing strategy for archival services in Zimbabwe Adoption of artificial intelligence to enhance records management practices at Gauteng Department of Education in South Africa A question of longevity: ongoing value of documentary film in an academic library Beyond 741.5: creating an identity for graphic novels in an academic library’s curriculum materials center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1