The effects of L1, task, and classifier type in Chinese-L2 learners’ use of classifiers

Jiahuan Zhang, Ksenia Gnevsheva
{"title":"The effects of L1, task, and classifier type in Chinese-L2 learners’ use of classifiers","authors":"Jiahuan Zhang, Ksenia Gnevsheva","doi":"10.1515/caslar-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explores three potential factors that influence Chinese L2 learners’ classifier use in a classroom setting: L1 background, task, and classifier type. We developed a picture-prompted test, including composition, free cloze, and multiple-choice cloze questions to elicit the use of classifiers. Participants were 50 Chinese L2 learners from Arabic, English, and Japanese L1 backgrounds. Although Japanese L1 participants performed numerically better than their Arabic and English counterparts, statistical analysis suggests that L1 was not a significant predictor of test performance. The composition task was shown to be conducive to the use of test-taking strategies, and it revealed a higher classifier accuracy than the more constrained multiple-choice task. Meanwhile, there was an interaction between L1 and task, suggesting that L1 influence may be conditioned by task type. Moreover, our logistic model predicts different levels of accuracy for classifier use by type, which potentially suggests a developmental path of acquiring classifiers licensed by the most prominent noun feature they are associated with, with shape being the earliest, followed by animate, inanimate, and concept.","PeriodicalId":37654,"journal":{"name":"Chinese as a Second Language Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"33 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese as a Second Language Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study explores three potential factors that influence Chinese L2 learners’ classifier use in a classroom setting: L1 background, task, and classifier type. We developed a picture-prompted test, including composition, free cloze, and multiple-choice cloze questions to elicit the use of classifiers. Participants were 50 Chinese L2 learners from Arabic, English, and Japanese L1 backgrounds. Although Japanese L1 participants performed numerically better than their Arabic and English counterparts, statistical analysis suggests that L1 was not a significant predictor of test performance. The composition task was shown to be conducive to the use of test-taking strategies, and it revealed a higher classifier accuracy than the more constrained multiple-choice task. Meanwhile, there was an interaction between L1 and task, suggesting that L1 influence may be conditioned by task type. Moreover, our logistic model predicts different levels of accuracy for classifier use by type, which potentially suggests a developmental path of acquiring classifiers licensed by the most prominent noun feature they are associated with, with shape being the earliest, followed by animate, inanimate, and concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母语、任务和分类器类型对汉语二语学习者使用分类器的影响
摘要本研究探讨了影响中国第二语言学习者在课堂环境中使用分类器的三个潜在因素:母语背景、任务和分类器类型。我们开发了一个图片提示测试,包括作文、自由填空和多项选择填空问题,以引出分类器的使用。参与者是50名来自阿拉伯语、英语和日语母语背景的中国第二语言学习者。虽然日语第一语言的参与者在数字上比阿拉伯语和英语的参与者表现得更好,但统计分析表明,第一语言并不是测试成绩的显著预测因素。写作任务被证明有利于使用应试策略,并且它比更多约束的选择任务显示出更高的分类准确率。同时,L1与任务之间存在交互作用,表明L1影响可能受任务类型的制约。此外,我们的逻辑模型预测了不同类型的分类器使用的不同精度水平,这可能表明了一个发展路径,即通过与之相关的最突出的名词特征获得分类器的许可,形状是最早的,其次是有生命的,无生命的和概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese as a Second Language Research
Chinese as a Second Language Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Chinese as a Second Language Research (CASLAR) focuses on research on the acquisition, development, and use of Chinese as a Second Language. It supports scholars and researchers from different linguistic fields, and serves as a forum to discuss, investigate, and better understand Chinese as a Second Language. Each issue (2 per year) of the journal publishes three papers in Chinese and three papers in English; summaries are always provided both in Chinese and English. We are especially interested in publishing articles and research papers that investigate how empirical findings of CSL research can advance and develop better Chinese language teaching methodologies, explore the implications of CSL research for theoretical developments and practical applications, focus on the acquisition and use of varieties of CSL, study the nature of interaction between native speakers and non-native speakers of Chinese, address major issues of second language acquisition from the perspective of CSL, analyze the ways in which language is both shaped by culture and is the medium through which culture is created.
期刊最新文献
Curriculum design in teaching Chinese characters to American students: when and what? Top-down Chinese as a second language reading strategies The relationship between parental involvement and children’s language acquisition “把” 字句中情态动词的位置 韩国企业员工汉语自主学习研究
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1