Network Robustness of Major Asian Airlines and the Impact of Airports’ Brokerage Roles

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of International Logistics and Trade Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.24006/jilt.2019.17.4.001
O. Kwon, Soobi Lee, H. Chung, P. Chhetri, Ok Soon Han
{"title":"Network Robustness of Major Asian Airlines and the Impact of Airports’ Brokerage Roles","authors":"O. Kwon, Soobi Lee, H. Chung, P. Chhetri, Ok Soon Han","doi":"10.24006/jilt.2019.17.4.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate the network robustness of major Asian airlines and to explore which airport types have the greatest impact on robustness. We also analyze airports’ specific brokerage roles and their impacts on the robustness of the entire air route network. We select 10 major Asian full-service airlines that operate the main passenger terminals at the top-ranked hub airports in Asia. Data is collected from the Official Airline Guide passenger route dataset for 2017. The results of the network robustness analysis show that Air China and China Eastern Airlines have relatively high network robustness. In contrast, airlines with broader international coverage, such as Japan Airlines, Korean Air, and Singapore Airlines have higher network vulnerability. The measure of betweenness centrality has a greater impact on the robustness of air route networks than other centrality measures have. Furthermore, the brokerage role analysis shows that Chinese airports are more influential within China and Asia but are less influential globally when compared to other major hub airports in Asia. Incheon International Airport, Singapore Changi Airport, Hong Kong International Airport, and Narita International Airport play strong “liaison” roles. Among the brokerage roles, the liaison role has a greater impact on the robustness of air route networks.","PeriodicalId":36581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","volume":"17 1","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Logistics and Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2019.17.4.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the network robustness of major Asian airlines and to explore which airport types have the greatest impact on robustness. We also analyze airports’ specific brokerage roles and their impacts on the robustness of the entire air route network. We select 10 major Asian full-service airlines that operate the main passenger terminals at the top-ranked hub airports in Asia. Data is collected from the Official Airline Guide passenger route dataset for 2017. The results of the network robustness analysis show that Air China and China Eastern Airlines have relatively high network robustness. In contrast, airlines with broader international coverage, such as Japan Airlines, Korean Air, and Singapore Airlines have higher network vulnerability. The measure of betweenness centrality has a greater impact on the robustness of air route networks than other centrality measures have. Furthermore, the brokerage role analysis shows that Chinese airports are more influential within China and Asia but are less influential globally when compared to other major hub airports in Asia. Incheon International Airport, Singapore Changi Airport, Hong Kong International Airport, and Narita International Airport play strong “liaison” roles. Among the brokerage roles, the liaison role has a greater impact on the robustness of air route networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚洲主要航空公司网络稳健性及机场经纪角色的影响
本研究旨在评估亚洲主要航空公司的网络稳健性,并探讨哪些机场类型对稳健性的影响最大。我们还分析了机场的具体经纪角色及其对整个航线网络稳健性的影响。我们选择了亚洲10家主要的全方位服务航空公司,这些航空公司在亚洲排名靠前的枢纽机场运营主要客运航站楼。数据来自2017年官方航空指南客运航线数据集。网络稳健性分析结果表明,国航和东航具有较高的网络稳健性。相比之下,国际覆盖范围更广的航空公司,如日本航空、大韩航空、新加坡航空等,其网络脆弱性更高。中间中心性的度量比其他中心性度量对航线网络稳健性的影响更大。此外,经纪角色分析显示,与亚洲其他主要枢纽机场相比,中国机场在中国和亚洲的影响力更大,但在全球的影响力较小。仁川国际机场、新加坡樟宜机场、香港国际机场和成田国际机场发挥着强大的“联络”作用。在经纪角色中,联络人角色对航线网络稳健性的影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Logistics and Trade
Journal of International Logistics and Trade Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
The mediating effect of eco-innovation on low-carbon supply chain practices toward manufacturing firm performance in Malaysia Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: a focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative Main contents and implications of the 2023 revision of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises* Impact of the chips act on the GVC participation of China's electronics industry A conceptual framework of green supply chain integration toward enterprise performance through ambidextrous green innovation: an organizational capability perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1