Estimation of Carbon pool in various agricultural crops in peatlands of West and Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

N. Rumbang, E. R. Asie, A. Jaya, S. Winarti, Mofit Saptono, S. Sarman, Erlinda Yurisinthae
{"title":"Estimation of Carbon pool in various agricultural crops in peatlands of West and Central Kalimantan, Indonesia","authors":"N. Rumbang, E. R. Asie, A. Jaya, S. Winarti, Mofit Saptono, S. Sarman, Erlinda Yurisinthae","doi":"10.18006/2023.11(1).199.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tropical peat is an important natural ecosystem, and its natural state plays an important role in climate regulation. These peatlands globally provide vital environmental benefits, especially in case of their enormous carbon storage potential. Peat land also functions as a source of livelihood for the community, especially for agricultural activities, and this will lead to the potential loss of carbon stock in peatlands. This study examines plants' potential to create Carbon to offset carbon dioxide emissions and different land use types. The study focused on Central and West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Peat soil samples were collected from various types of land from 0-15, 15-45, and 45-100 cm depth and analyzed for physical and chemical parameters. The cylinder chamber method with infrared gas analysis model EGM-4 was used to measure CO2 emissions. Plant carbon sequestration was measured in a 6.25 m2 plot in the study sites of Central Kalimantan. The study showed that type of commodity and period of management affect the carbon content in peat with different land uses, and it is affected by soil bulk density, organic matter content, and CO2 emission. In the case of study crops, oil palm, rubber, corn, and mustard emit the highest CO2. Further, corn crop has the highest potential to fix carbon dioxide and produces more Carbon per hectare than the Carbon emitted from corn-planted under peatland conditions. The study indicated that the type of commodity and the time of its management affected the carbon content in peat with different land uses, and carbon content got the change with soil bulk density and soil organic matter content.","PeriodicalId":15766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18006/2023.11(1).199.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical peat is an important natural ecosystem, and its natural state plays an important role in climate regulation. These peatlands globally provide vital environmental benefits, especially in case of their enormous carbon storage potential. Peat land also functions as a source of livelihood for the community, especially for agricultural activities, and this will lead to the potential loss of carbon stock in peatlands. This study examines plants' potential to create Carbon to offset carbon dioxide emissions and different land use types. The study focused on Central and West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Peat soil samples were collected from various types of land from 0-15, 15-45, and 45-100 cm depth and analyzed for physical and chemical parameters. The cylinder chamber method with infrared gas analysis model EGM-4 was used to measure CO2 emissions. Plant carbon sequestration was measured in a 6.25 m2 plot in the study sites of Central Kalimantan. The study showed that type of commodity and period of management affect the carbon content in peat with different land uses, and it is affected by soil bulk density, organic matter content, and CO2 emission. In the case of study crops, oil palm, rubber, corn, and mustard emit the highest CO2. Further, corn crop has the highest potential to fix carbon dioxide and produces more Carbon per hectare than the Carbon emitted from corn-planted under peatland conditions. The study indicated that the type of commodity and the time of its management affected the carbon content in peat with different land uses, and carbon content got the change with soil bulk density and soil organic matter content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼加里曼丹西部和中部泥炭地不同农作物碳库估算
热带泥炭是一种重要的自然生态系统,其自然状态在气候调节中起着重要作用。这些泥炭地在全球范围内提供了至关重要的环境效益,特别是在其巨大的碳储存潜力的情况下。泥炭地也是社区的生计来源,特别是农业活动,这将导致泥炭地碳储量的潜在损失。这项研究考察了植物产生碳以抵消二氧化碳排放和不同土地利用类型的潜力。这项研究的重点是印度尼西亚加里曼丹的中部和西部。选取深度为0 ~ 15、15 ~ 45和45 ~ 100 cm的不同类型土地的泥炭土样品,进行理化参数分析。采用红外气体分析模型EGM-4的缸室法测量CO2排放量。在加里曼丹中部研究地点的6.25 m2地块上测量了植物的碳固存。研究表明,不同土地利用方式的泥炭碳含量受商品类型和经营年限的影响,且受土壤容重、有机质含量和CO2排放的影响。以研究作物为例,油棕、橡胶、玉米和芥菜排放的二氧化碳最高。此外,玉米作物具有最大的固定二氧化碳的潜力,每公顷产生的碳比泥炭地条件下种植的玉米排放的碳多。研究表明,不同土地利用方式泥炭的碳含量受商品类型和经营时间的影响,且碳含量随土壤容重和土壤有机质含量的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences
Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Assess the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of herbal popsicles prepared by Hibiscus sabdariffa L. and Clitorea ternatea floral waste HPLC based Phytochemicals Analysis of Phyllanthus emblica (Indian Gooseberry/Amla): A mini Review Exploring the Impact of Micro-plastics on Soil Health and Ecosystem Dynamics: A Comprehensive Review Potential effect of fruit and flower extracts of Arbutus unedo L. on Tetrahymena pyriformis exposed to a cobalt-60 source AN ASSESSMENT OF PESTICIDE POISONING INCIDENCES PRESENTED AT HEALTH CARE FACILITIES IN MASHONALAND CENTRAL PROVINCE, ZIMBABWE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1