{"title":"Who owns paradise? Afro-Brazilians and ethnic tourism in Brazil’s quilombos","authors":"Merle L. Bowen","doi":"10.1080/17528631.2016.1189689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In twenty-first century Brazil, Afro-Brazilians have embraced various cultural markers of their ethno-racial identity to improve their economic survival and well-being. Although these markers may take many forms across Brazil, this essay examines the growing enterprise of ethnic tourism in quilombos or communities of African descent. The work of John L. and Jean Comaroff, Ethnicity, Inc., is introduced as a point of departure to explore the two different manifestations of the ethnic commodity economy: the commodification of culture and the incorporation of identity. I argue that the ethno-commodity phenomenon is not a scalable or equitable model of development for Brazil’s quilombos. Case studies show that quilombolas or residents of these communities have adopted ethnic tourism primarily because of the loss of wage employment alternatives and environmental policies that threaten their livelihoods. The examples also illustrate that quilombolas continue to sell their labor, even as they are forced to insert themselves into the global economy by commodifying their culture.","PeriodicalId":39013,"journal":{"name":"African and Black Diaspora","volume":"10 1","pages":"179 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17528631.2016.1189689","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African and Black Diaspora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17528631.2016.1189689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
ABSTRACT In twenty-first century Brazil, Afro-Brazilians have embraced various cultural markers of their ethno-racial identity to improve their economic survival and well-being. Although these markers may take many forms across Brazil, this essay examines the growing enterprise of ethnic tourism in quilombos or communities of African descent. The work of John L. and Jean Comaroff, Ethnicity, Inc., is introduced as a point of departure to explore the two different manifestations of the ethnic commodity economy: the commodification of culture and the incorporation of identity. I argue that the ethno-commodity phenomenon is not a scalable or equitable model of development for Brazil’s quilombos. Case studies show that quilombolas or residents of these communities have adopted ethnic tourism primarily because of the loss of wage employment alternatives and environmental policies that threaten their livelihoods. The examples also illustrate that quilombolas continue to sell their labor, even as they are forced to insert themselves into the global economy by commodifying their culture.
在21世纪的巴西,非裔巴西人已经接受了他们的民族-种族身份的各种文化标志,以改善他们的经济生存和福祉。尽管这些标志在巴西各地可能有多种形式,但本文考察了在“歌伦波”或非洲裔社区中不断发展的民族旅游企业。本文以John L. and Jean Comaroff, Ethnicity, Inc.的作品为出发点,探讨民族商品经济的两种不同表现形式:文化的商品化和身份的整合。我认为,对巴西的歌伦波族来说,民族商品现象不是一种可扩展或公平的发展模式。案例研究表明,“歌伦波拉”或这些社区的居民之所以选择民族旅游,主要是因为他们失去了有工资的就业机会,环境政策也威胁到他们的生计。这些例子还表明,尽管“歌伦波拉”被迫通过将自己的文化商品化而融入全球经济,但他们仍在继续出售自己的劳动力。