Exploring the Relationship between Science Content Knowledge and Science Teaching Self-Efficacy among Elementary Teachers

Q3 Social Sciences IAFOR Journal of Education Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.22492/IJE.7.1.04
Amy Amy Catalano, Lauren Asselta, Alana Durkin
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship between Science Content Knowledge and Science Teaching Self-Efficacy among Elementary Teachers","authors":"Amy Amy Catalano, Lauren Asselta, Alana Durkin","doi":"10.22492/IJE.7.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elementary school teachers are commonly known to have low self-efficacy in mathematics and science. Previously conducted research on science teaching self-efficacy and content knowledge has often focused on whether methods courses, professional development or other interventions improve both self-efficacy and content knowledge among elementary teachers. This study investigated whether teachers’ knowledge of science content influenced their levels of self-efficacy, and compared teachers’ who were in a STEM education graduate degree program to teachers and students in a regular elementary teaching program. The participants of this study were 82 in-service and 27 pre-service elementary teachers in affiliation with a large northeastern university. The participants completed a science selfefficacy survey (STEBI-B) and a science content knowledge survey called the Science Beliefs Tests. The results of this study found that pre-service teachers had a higher selfefficacy score in comparison to in-service teachers. Most participants were able to answer a little more than half of the Science Beliefs questions correctly. Additionally, there was a negative relationship between one’s belief that they could teach science effectively and their Science Beliefs score, meaning that the more science self-efficacy they possessed, the lower their science knowledge. It is important that teachers become aware of their lack of content knowledge in order to remedy the insufficiency, and to avoid passing along misconceptions to their students. If teachers believe that they have high self-efficacy, they may not be aware that they must continually improve their science content knowledge. Accordingly, teachers can benefit from continued education in topic areas where they scored the lowest.","PeriodicalId":52248,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/IJE.7.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Elementary school teachers are commonly known to have low self-efficacy in mathematics and science. Previously conducted research on science teaching self-efficacy and content knowledge has often focused on whether methods courses, professional development or other interventions improve both self-efficacy and content knowledge among elementary teachers. This study investigated whether teachers’ knowledge of science content influenced their levels of self-efficacy, and compared teachers’ who were in a STEM education graduate degree program to teachers and students in a regular elementary teaching program. The participants of this study were 82 in-service and 27 pre-service elementary teachers in affiliation with a large northeastern university. The participants completed a science selfefficacy survey (STEBI-B) and a science content knowledge survey called the Science Beliefs Tests. The results of this study found that pre-service teachers had a higher selfefficacy score in comparison to in-service teachers. Most participants were able to answer a little more than half of the Science Beliefs questions correctly. Additionally, there was a negative relationship between one’s belief that they could teach science effectively and their Science Beliefs score, meaning that the more science self-efficacy they possessed, the lower their science knowledge. It is important that teachers become aware of their lack of content knowledge in order to remedy the insufficiency, and to avoid passing along misconceptions to their students. If teachers believe that they have high self-efficacy, they may not be aware that they must continually improve their science content knowledge. Accordingly, teachers can benefit from continued education in topic areas where they scored the lowest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学教师科学内容知识与科学教学自我效能感的关系探讨
众所周知,小学教师在数学和科学方面的自我效能感较低。先前对科学教学自我效能感和内容知识进行的研究通常集中在方法课程、专业发展或其他干预措施是否能提高小学教师的自我效能感或内容知识。本研究调查了教师对科学内容的了解是否影响了他们的自我效能水平,并将参加STEM教育研究生学位课程的教师与参加常规小学教学课程的教师和学生进行了比较。这项研究的参与者是82名在职和27名职前小学教师,他们隶属于东北一所大型大学。参与者完成了一项科学自我效能感调查(STEBI-B)和一项名为“科学信念测试”的科学内容知识调查。这项研究的结果发现,与在职教师相比,职前教师的自我效能感得分更高。大多数参与者能够正确回答略多于一半的科学信仰问题。此外,一个人认为自己可以有效地教授科学的信念与他们的科学信念得分之间存在负相关,这意味着他们拥有的科学自我效能感越多,他们的科学知识就越低。重要的是,教师要意识到他们缺乏内容知识,以弥补不足,避免将误解传递给学生。如果教师认为他们有很高的自我效能感,他们可能没有意识到他们必须不断提高自己的科学内容知识。因此,教师可以从他们得分最低的专题领域的继续教育中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IAFOR Journal of Education
IAFOR Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intercultural Communication: The Perceptions of Lebanese High School Directors Adoption of Innovative ELT Strategies by English Language Teachers in Rural Laos Examining Students’ Perspectives on Pedagogical Translanguaging in the Multilingual Classroom Context Enriching Students’ Cross-Cultural and Multilingual Communication: The Serious Play Approach Utilizing Playmobil Pro Figures Language Attrition and Cultural Identity Dynamics in International Schools in Azerbaijan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1