Adaptation of a Standard Industrial Peel Test for Testing Consolidants in the Conservation Studio

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the American Institute for Conservation Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/01971360.2022.2130982
Noa Kollaard, W. Wei
{"title":"Adaptation of a Standard Industrial Peel Test for Testing Consolidants in the Conservation Studio","authors":"Noa Kollaard, W. Wei","doi":"10.1080/01971360.2022.2130982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Adhesives and consolidant strength play a major role in many conservation treatments. In industry, adhesive strength is often determined using standardized tests including 90° peel tests. However, not all conservation studios have or can afford mechanical testing equipment for such tests, although it is often readily accessible at third-party facilities. For a university conservation project, an international standard 90° peel test was modified to study the adhesive strength of consolidants for zinc white paints. Consolidants were applied to painting canvas strips, which were then adhered to zinc white paint layers on glass supports. The strips were peeled downward by continually adding fine sand to a cup attached to the end of the canvas strips. Video recordings were made of the continual loading and sudden stepwise extensions of the peeling samples, so that step-wise force - peel length curves could be plotted for each specimen. The data combined with examination of the peeled surfaces provided important qualitative information over strength and toughness (ductility/brittleness) for comparing the tested consolidant-zinc white systems. The adapted peel test is therefore a valuable method for testing adhesives and consolidants in the conservation studio. However, one must avoid overinterpreting the results, since consolidant selection depends on more factors than just mechanical properties.","PeriodicalId":17165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","volume":"62 1","pages":"139 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2022.2130982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Adhesives and consolidant strength play a major role in many conservation treatments. In industry, adhesive strength is often determined using standardized tests including 90° peel tests. However, not all conservation studios have or can afford mechanical testing equipment for such tests, although it is often readily accessible at third-party facilities. For a university conservation project, an international standard 90° peel test was modified to study the adhesive strength of consolidants for zinc white paints. Consolidants were applied to painting canvas strips, which were then adhered to zinc white paint layers on glass supports. The strips were peeled downward by continually adding fine sand to a cup attached to the end of the canvas strips. Video recordings were made of the continual loading and sudden stepwise extensions of the peeling samples, so that step-wise force - peel length curves could be plotted for each specimen. The data combined with examination of the peeled surfaces provided important qualitative information over strength and toughness (ductility/brittleness) for comparing the tested consolidant-zinc white systems. The adapted peel test is therefore a valuable method for testing adhesives and consolidants in the conservation studio. However, one must avoid overinterpreting the results, since consolidant selection depends on more factors than just mechanical properties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用标准工业剥离试验在保护工作室测试固化剂
胶粘剂和固结强度在许多保护治疗中起着重要作用。在工业中,粘合强度通常使用标准化测试来确定,包括90°剥离测试。然而,并不是所有的保护工作室都有或能够负担得起这种测试的机械测试设备,尽管第三方设施通常很容易获得。为一所大学的保护工程,对国际标准的90°剥离试验进行了修改,以研究锌白漆固结剂的粘接强度。将固化剂应用于绘画帆布条,然后将其粘附在玻璃支架上的锌白漆层上。将细沙不断地倒入固定在帆布条末端的杯子中,使帆布条向下剥落。对剥离试样的连续加载和突然的逐步延伸进行录像,以便绘制出每个试样的逐步力剥长度曲线。该数据结合对剥离表面的检查,为比较已测试的固结-锌白体系提供了关于强度和韧性(延展性/脆性)的重要定性信息。因此,适应性剥离测试是在保护工作室测试粘合剂和固结剂的一种有价值的方法。然而,必须避免过度解释结果,因为固结剂的选择取决于更多因素,而不仅仅是机械性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The American Institute for Conservation is the largest conservation membership organization in the United States, and counts among its more than 3000 members the majority of professional conservators, conservation educators and conservation scientists worldwide. The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC, or the Journal) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to the JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.
期刊最新文献
Analytical Investigation of Two Syrian-Style Bronze Sphinx Plaques from the Iron Age of West Asia (First Millennium BCE) Introduction to the Special Issue on Practical Approaches to Technical Research – Part 2 Untangling Indian Hemp: Identifying Woodlands Bast Fibers in Collections Using a PH-adjusted Semi-rigid Agarose Gel with Ion Exchange Resin for Poultice Desalination: Preliminary Experimentation and Case Studies Preventive Conservation: Continuously Defining Itself at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1