On sovereignty

D. Svantesson, S. Haataja, Danielle Ireland-Piper, Kuan-Wei (David) Chen
{"title":"On sovereignty","authors":"D. Svantesson, S. Haataja, Danielle Ireland-Piper, Kuan-Wei (David) Chen","doi":"10.5817/mujlt2023-1-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of sovereignty is more important than ever in the Cyber context, yet it is poorly understood. With this article, we are seeking to contribute towards a shared understanding of the concept of sovereignty by succinctly addressing the following six, interrelated, questions:\n\nWho can claim to have sovereignty;\nOver what can one have sovereignty;\nWhat are the consequences of having sovereignty over something;\nWho can violate sovereignty;\nWhat is the threshold for violating sovereignty; and\nWhat are the consequences of violating sovereignty?\n\nHowever, this article is not limited to a descriptive account of the law as it stands today. A purely descriptive account would not provide a full picture of the complex concept of sovereignty, and we have felt it appropriate to enter the territory of law reform options in parts of the discussion.\nWhile sovereignty is a technology-neutral concept and the article addresses it as such, particular attention is directed at sovereignty in the cyber context.","PeriodicalId":38294,"journal":{"name":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/mujlt2023-1-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The concept of sovereignty is more important than ever in the Cyber context, yet it is poorly understood. With this article, we are seeking to contribute towards a shared understanding of the concept of sovereignty by succinctly addressing the following six, interrelated, questions: Who can claim to have sovereignty; Over what can one have sovereignty; What are the consequences of having sovereignty over something; Who can violate sovereignty; What is the threshold for violating sovereignty; and What are the consequences of violating sovereignty? However, this article is not limited to a descriptive account of the law as it stands today. A purely descriptive account would not provide a full picture of the complex concept of sovereignty, and we have felt it appropriate to enter the territory of law reform options in parts of the discussion. While sovereignty is a technology-neutral concept and the article addresses it as such, particular attention is directed at sovereignty in the cyber context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论主权
在网络环境下,主权的概念比以往任何时候都更重要,但人们对它的理解却很少。通过这篇文章,我们试图通过简明扼要地解决以下六个相互关联的问题,促进对主权概念的共同理解:谁可以声称拥有主权;对什么可以拥有主权;对某事拥有主权的后果是什么;谁可以侵犯主权;侵犯主权的门槛是多少;侵犯主权的后果是什么?然而,这篇文章并不局限于对当今法律的描述。纯粹的描述性叙述无法全面了解复杂的主权概念,我们认为在部分讨论中进入法律改革选项的领域是适当的。虽然主权是一个技术中立的概念,本文也对此进行了阐述,但特别关注的是网络背景下的主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Addressing Evolving Digital Piracy Through Contributory Liability for Copyright Infringement: The Mobdro Case Study (Un)lock and (Un)loaded: Regulating 3D-Printed Firearms in the Open-source Era after the 2013 Hysteria Patent-Eligible Invention Requirement Under the European Patent Convention and its Implications on Creations Involving Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity: Notorious, but Often Misused and Confused Terms How the Two Child Abuse Cases Helped to Shape the Test of Originality of Photographic Works
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1