Clinical application of preoperative selective arterial embolization for spinal tumors

Chuanzhuo Wang, Zhaoyu Liu, Hairui Wang, De-Shuo Dong
{"title":"Clinical application of preoperative selective arterial embolization for spinal tumors","authors":"Chuanzhuo Wang, Zhaoyu Liu, Hairui Wang, De-Shuo Dong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the clinical value of preoperative selective arterial embolization for spinal tumors. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinical data of 42 consecutive patients who underwent spinal tumor resection in department of orthopedics Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into embolization group (20 cases) and non-embolization group (22 cases) according to whether they underwent arterial embolization before tumor resection. Two surgical treatments including vertebral resection and laminectomy were performed. The embolization group included 12 cases of vertebral resection and 8 cases of laminectomy; while the non-embolization group included 13 cases of vertebral resection and 9 cases of laminectomy. The difference of intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell, calibrated estimated blood loss, operation time and hospitalization time were compared using independent sample t test. \n \n \nResults \nTwenty patients in the embolization group underwent successful interventional embolization without serious complications. There were no significant differences between the embolization group and the non-embolization group in terms of intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell, calibrated estimated blood loss, operation time, and hospitalization time (P>0.05). Among the patients who underwent vertebral resection, intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell and calibrated estimated blood loss were (1 966.7±898.8) ml, (7.42±3.27) U and (91.3±39.2) g/L in the embolization group, and (2 838.5±1 143.5) ml, (11.04±4.08) U and (133.0±46.4) g/L in the non-embolization group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (t=-2.107, -2.436, -2.419, P 0.05). Among the patients who underwent laminectomy, there were no significant differences in the above-mentioned indicators between the embolization group and the non-embolization group (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nSelective arterial embolization for spinal tumors is a relatively safe interventional procedure. Preoperative embolization does not significantly reduce the amount of blood loss during surgical procedures. After the surgical procedures were differentiated, preoperative embolization significantly reduces the amount of blood loss in patients underwent vertebral resection, while patients who underwent laminectomy do not benefit significantly. \n \n \nKey words: \nNeoplasms; Spine; Embolization, therapeutic; Preoperative period; Blood loss, surgical","PeriodicalId":39377,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1005-1201.2020.02.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical value of preoperative selective arterial embolization for spinal tumors. Methods The clinical data of 42 consecutive patients who underwent spinal tumor resection in department of orthopedics Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into embolization group (20 cases) and non-embolization group (22 cases) according to whether they underwent arterial embolization before tumor resection. Two surgical treatments including vertebral resection and laminectomy were performed. The embolization group included 12 cases of vertebral resection and 8 cases of laminectomy; while the non-embolization group included 13 cases of vertebral resection and 9 cases of laminectomy. The difference of intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell, calibrated estimated blood loss, operation time and hospitalization time were compared using independent sample t test. Results Twenty patients in the embolization group underwent successful interventional embolization without serious complications. There were no significant differences between the embolization group and the non-embolization group in terms of intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell, calibrated estimated blood loss, operation time, and hospitalization time (P>0.05). Among the patients who underwent vertebral resection, intraoperative estimated blood loss, total number of transfused packed red blood cell and calibrated estimated blood loss were (1 966.7±898.8) ml, (7.42±3.27) U and (91.3±39.2) g/L in the embolization group, and (2 838.5±1 143.5) ml, (11.04±4.08) U and (133.0±46.4) g/L in the non-embolization group, respectively, with statistically significant differences (t=-2.107, -2.436, -2.419, P 0.05). Among the patients who underwent laminectomy, there were no significant differences in the above-mentioned indicators between the embolization group and the non-embolization group (P>0.05). Conclusion Selective arterial embolization for spinal tumors is a relatively safe interventional procedure. Preoperative embolization does not significantly reduce the amount of blood loss during surgical procedures. After the surgical procedures were differentiated, preoperative embolization significantly reduces the amount of blood loss in patients underwent vertebral resection, while patients who underwent laminectomy do not benefit significantly. Key words: Neoplasms; Spine; Embolization, therapeutic; Preoperative period; Blood loss, surgical
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱肿瘤术前选择性动脉栓塞的临床应用
目的探讨术前选择性动脉栓塞治疗脊柱肿瘤的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月在中国医科大学附属盛京医院骨科行脊柱肿瘤切除术的42例患者的临床资料。根据肿瘤切除术前是否行动脉栓塞治疗分为栓塞组(20例)和非栓塞组(22例)。两种手术治疗包括椎体切除和椎板切除术。栓塞组椎体切除12例,椎板切除8例;非栓塞组13例椎体切除,9例椎板切除。采用独立样本t检验比较术中估计失血量、输注填充红细胞总数、校准估计失血量、手术时间和住院时间的差异。结果栓塞组20例患者介入栓塞成功,无严重并发症。栓塞组与非栓塞组术中估计失血量、输注填充红细胞总数、校准估计失血量、手术时间、住院时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在行椎体切除术的患者中,栓塞组术中估计失血量、输注填充红细胞总数和校准估计失血量分别为(1 966.7±898.8)ml、(7.42±3.27)U和(91.3±39.2)g/L,非栓塞组分别为(2 838.5±1 143.5)ml、(11.04±4.08)U和(133.0±46.4)g/L,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.107、-2.436、-2.419,P 0.05)。在行椎板切除术的患者中,栓塞组与非栓塞组在上述指标上差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论选择性动脉栓塞治疗脊柱肿瘤是一种相对安全的介入治疗方法。术前栓塞不能显著减少手术过程中的出血量。在区分手术方式后,术前栓塞可显著减少椎体切除术患者的出血量,而椎板切除术患者则无明显获益。关键词:肿瘤;脊柱;栓塞治疗;术前时期;失血,手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology
Zhonghua fang she xue za zhi Chinese journal of radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10639
期刊最新文献
Study progress of cerebrovascular interventional surgery robot Value of chest CT screening in the early COVID-19 outbreak Imaging dynamic observation of cured COVID-19 patients with imported coronavirus pneumonia/ 输入性新型冠状病毒肺炎治愈患者肺内病变的影像学动态观察 The diagnostic value of chest CT imaging in differential diagnosis between common-type COVID-19 and mycoplasma pneumonia/ 胸部CT在普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎与支原体肺炎鉴别诊断中的价值 The role of medical imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1