Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Blunt Injury to Abdomen in Hemodynamically Stable Patients

Reethika Thatikonda, Sathyanarayana Gorthi, Pranay Baith, Ali Raza Syed, Lakshmi Vara Prasad Gaddam, Vijetha Potru, Adithya Murthy Ponna, Manasa Gaini
{"title":"Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Blunt Injury to Abdomen in Hemodynamically Stable Patients","authors":"Reethika Thatikonda, Sathyanarayana Gorthi, Pranay Baith, Ali Raza Syed, Lakshmi Vara Prasad Gaddam, Vijetha Potru, Adithya Murthy Ponna, Manasa Gaini","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i4.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nIn this study, we wanted to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management of blunt injury to abdomen in hemodynamically stable patients. \nMETHODS \nThis was a hospital based prospective observational clinical case study conducted among 30 patients who presented with blunt trauma of abdomen to the Department of General Surgery, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, from September 2019 to September 2021 after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent from the study participants. The aim of the study is to assess the role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the management of Blunt Injury to Abdomen in Hemodynamically Stable patients. Objective of the study were to assess the incidence of Hollow Viscus Injury not detected by clinical or radiological assessment, incidence of persistent bleed and to assess the incidence of Mesentery injury not detected by clinical or radiological assessment. \nRESULTS \nThe most common mode of injury was road traffic accidents (23 cases) 76.66 %, followed by fall from height (3 cases) 9.99 %. Then accidents and assaults which were (2 cases) 2.22 % each. Ongoing bleeding from solid organ injuries was seen intra-operatively in 3 cases (9.99 %). P value = 0.0237 was calculated using Fischer’s exact test and was found to be significant P < 0.05. Most common grade of liver injury was Grade 1- 37.75 % followed by grade 3 - 33.33 %, then grade 2 - 20.8 % and grade 4 - 8.33 %. Grade 1 and grade 2 splenic injuries were more common with 36.36 % (4 cases) each. Followed by grade 3 27.27 % (3 cases). Diagnostic laparoscopy ongoing bleed was noted in 9.99 % (3 cases), followed by mesenteric injury in 6.66 % (2 cases) and hollow viscous perforation in 3.33 % (1 case). Total of 6 therapeutic procedures were done after diagnostic laparoscopy. Out of which, 4 were carried out in laparoscopy (66.66 %) and two were converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy (33.33 %). \nCONCLUSIONS \nDiagnostic laparoscopy can be carried out in patients of blunt trauma of abdomen, who are hemodynamically stable without any increase in morbidity or mortality. It is a highly useful tool to detect injuries which could not be detected on CT scan. Laparoscopic surgery can be used both as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Laparoscopy helps in reducing the negative laparotomies and significant decrease in both morbidity and mortality. With advances in technology and increasing in expertise in laparoscopy, it can be concluded that diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable modality in the diagnosis and management of patients with blunt trauma to abdomen.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i4.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND In this study, we wanted to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management of blunt injury to abdomen in hemodynamically stable patients. METHODS This was a hospital based prospective observational clinical case study conducted among 30 patients who presented with blunt trauma of abdomen to the Department of General Surgery, Kamineni Academy of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, from September 2019 to September 2021 after obtaining clearance from Institutional Ethics Committee and written informed consent from the study participants. The aim of the study is to assess the role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the management of Blunt Injury to Abdomen in Hemodynamically Stable patients. Objective of the study were to assess the incidence of Hollow Viscus Injury not detected by clinical or radiological assessment, incidence of persistent bleed and to assess the incidence of Mesentery injury not detected by clinical or radiological assessment. RESULTS The most common mode of injury was road traffic accidents (23 cases) 76.66 %, followed by fall from height (3 cases) 9.99 %. Then accidents and assaults which were (2 cases) 2.22 % each. Ongoing bleeding from solid organ injuries was seen intra-operatively in 3 cases (9.99 %). P value = 0.0237 was calculated using Fischer’s exact test and was found to be significant P < 0.05. Most common grade of liver injury was Grade 1- 37.75 % followed by grade 3 - 33.33 %, then grade 2 - 20.8 % and grade 4 - 8.33 %. Grade 1 and grade 2 splenic injuries were more common with 36.36 % (4 cases) each. Followed by grade 3 27.27 % (3 cases). Diagnostic laparoscopy ongoing bleed was noted in 9.99 % (3 cases), followed by mesenteric injury in 6.66 % (2 cases) and hollow viscous perforation in 3.33 % (1 case). Total of 6 therapeutic procedures were done after diagnostic laparoscopy. Out of which, 4 were carried out in laparoscopy (66.66 %) and two were converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy (33.33 %). CONCLUSIONS Diagnostic laparoscopy can be carried out in patients of blunt trauma of abdomen, who are hemodynamically stable without any increase in morbidity or mortality. It is a highly useful tool to detect injuries which could not be detected on CT scan. Laparoscopic surgery can be used both as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Laparoscopy helps in reducing the negative laparotomies and significant decrease in both morbidity and mortality. With advances in technology and increasing in expertise in laparoscopy, it can be concluded that diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable modality in the diagnosis and management of patients with blunt trauma to abdomen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断腹腔镜在血流动力学稳定患者腹部钝性损伤评估中的作用
在这项研究中,我们想评估诊断腹腔镜在血流动力学稳定的腹部钝性损伤患者的治疗中的作用。方法:这是一项基于医院的前瞻性观察性临床病例研究,在获得机构伦理委员会的批准和研究参与者的书面知情同意后,于2019年9月至2021年9月在海德拉巴L.B. Nagar的Kamineni医学科学与研究中心普通外科就诊的30例腹部钝性创伤患者中进行。本研究的目的是评估诊断腹腔镜在血流动力学稳定患者腹部钝性损伤治疗中的作用。本研究的目的是评估临床或放射学评估未发现的空心内脏损伤的发生率、持续出血的发生率以及临床或放射学评估未发现的肠系膜损伤的发生率。结果以道路交通事故(23例)为主,占76.66%;其次为高空坠落(3例),占9.99%;其次是意外事故和袭击(2例),各占2.22%。术中出现实体器官损伤持续出血3例(9.99%)。采用Fischer精确检验计算P值= 0.0237,P < 0.05。最常见的肝损伤等级为1 ~ 37.75%,其次是3 ~ 33.33%,然后是2 ~ 20.8%和4 ~ 8.33%。1、2级脾损伤多见,各占36.36%(4例)。3级3例,占27.27%。诊断性腹腔镜下持续出血3例(9.99%),肠系膜损伤2例(6.66%),中空粘稠穿孔1例(3.33%)。诊断性腹腔镜检查后共进行6次治疗。其中腹腔镜手术4例(66.66%),由腹腔镜转为开腹手术2例(33.33%)。结论腹部钝性创伤患者在血流动力学稳定且发病率和死亡率未增加的情况下,可进行诊断性腹腔镜检查。它是一种非常有用的工具,可以检测到CT扫描无法检测到的损伤。腹腔镜手术可以作为诊断和治疗的方式。腹腔镜检查有助于减少阴性剖腹手术,显著降低发病率和死亡率。随着腹腔镜技术的进步和专业知识的增加,诊断性腹腔镜在腹部钝性创伤的诊断和治疗中是一种有价值的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1