Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery

Pub Date : 2021-03-19 DOI:10.4236/OJANES.2021.113008
Ayhan Şahin, O. Baran, A. Gültekin, G. Sahin, C. Arar
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery","authors":"Ayhan Şahin, O. Baran, A. Gültekin, G. Sahin, C. Arar","doi":"10.4236/OJANES.2021.113008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients who underwent elective lumbar stenosis surgery between February 1, 2019, and April 1, 2019. Patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis under general anesthesia alone were compared with those who underwent general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane block. Aims: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate whether erector spinae plane block reduced opioid consumption following surgery for spinal stenosis. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: We collected data on the pain scores, time for the first requirement for patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia dose, requirement for rescue analgesia, time to first stand up postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The numerical rating scale’s pain scores were significantly lower in the erector spinae plane group at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours than in the general anesthesia group. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was higher in the general anesthesia group than in the ESP group [212.0 (6.6) mg, vs. 107.3 (36.9 mg), (p  Conclusion: ESP block appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery.","PeriodicalId":90667,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJANES.2021.113008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients who underwent elective lumbar stenosis surgery between February 1, 2019, and April 1, 2019. Patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis under general anesthesia alone were compared with those who underwent general anesthesia combined with erector spinae plane block. Aims: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate whether erector spinae plane block reduced opioid consumption following surgery for spinal stenosis. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: We collected data on the pain scores, time for the first requirement for patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol, the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia dose, requirement for rescue analgesia, time to first stand up postoperatively and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Sixty patients were included in the study. The numerical rating scale’s pain scores were significantly lower in the erector spinae plane group at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours than in the general anesthesia group. The cumulative dose of patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was higher in the general anesthesia group than in the ESP group [212.0 (6.6) mg, vs. 107.3 (36.9 mg), (p  Conclusion: ESP block appear to be an effective method to relieve pain after lumbar surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞用于腰椎管狭窄症手术
背景:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们评估了在2019年2月1日至2019年4月1日期间接受选择性腰椎管狭窄症手术的患者。将单纯全麻下接受腰椎管狭窄症手术的患者与全麻联合竖脊肌平面阻滞的患者进行比较。目的:我们旨在回顾性评估脊柱狭窄手术后竖脊肌平面阻滞是否减少阿片类药物的消耗。研究设计:一项回顾性观察性研究。方法:我们收集了曲马多患者自控镇痛的疼痛评分、首次要求时间、累计患者自控镇痛剂量、抢救性镇痛要求、术后首次站立时间和术后恶心呕吐发生率的数据。结果:60名患者被纳入研究。竖脊肌平面组在1、2、4、6、12和24小时的疼痛评分显著低于全麻组。全身麻醉组患者自控镇痛曲马多的累积剂量高于ESP组[22.0(6.6)mg,高于107.3(36.9 mg),(p结论:ESP阻滞似乎是缓解腰椎手术后疼痛的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1