THE TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITS OF THE RULE OF LAW, AND THE PERSPECTIVE OF DEVELOPING STATES

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Indonesia Law Review Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.15742/ILREV.V11N1.694
H. Lim
{"title":"THE TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITS OF THE RULE OF LAW, AND THE PERSPECTIVE OF DEVELOPING STATES","authors":"H. Lim","doi":"10.15742/ILREV.V11N1.694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 4th industrial revolution and its attendant technologies has given rise to many discussions around the impact of technology on justice and the rule of law. The working assumption here that an effective state is necessary to establish the rule of law, thus it is necessary to understand the impact of such technology on the state itself to fully appreciate the impact of such technology on the rule of law. In doing so, it is important to recognise and consider that not all states are the same and it is necessary to consider the differences between states. Moreover, such topics are generally discussed from the perspective of developed and industrialized states, where such technology is most extensively developed and deployed. But the impact of the 4th industrial revolution is not limited to the developed world, and communities in developing states constantly engage with such technology, particularly with social media, even if such technology and platforms are developed elsewhere. This paper seeks to position the discussion within the context of developing countries in Southeast Asia to demonstrate the necessity of developing technologically relevant institutions. In doing so, the past experiences of post-colonial developing states, who are on their own journey in establishing effective institutions relevant to their communities, would be invaluable in this process.","PeriodicalId":13484,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15742/ILREV.V11N1.694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 4th industrial revolution and its attendant technologies has given rise to many discussions around the impact of technology on justice and the rule of law. The working assumption here that an effective state is necessary to establish the rule of law, thus it is necessary to understand the impact of such technology on the state itself to fully appreciate the impact of such technology on the rule of law. In doing so, it is important to recognise and consider that not all states are the same and it is necessary to consider the differences between states. Moreover, such topics are generally discussed from the perspective of developed and industrialized states, where such technology is most extensively developed and deployed. But the impact of the 4th industrial revolution is not limited to the developed world, and communities in developing states constantly engage with such technology, particularly with social media, even if such technology and platforms are developed elsewhere. This paper seeks to position the discussion within the context of developing countries in Southeast Asia to demonstrate the necessity of developing technologically relevant institutions. In doing so, the past experiences of post-colonial developing states, who are on their own journey in establishing effective institutions relevant to their communities, would be invaluable in this process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法治的技术局限与发展中国家的视角
第四次工业革命及其伴随而来的技术引发了许多关于技术对司法和法治影响的讨论。这里的工作假设是一个有效的国家是建立法治的必要条件,因此有必要了解这种技术对国家本身的影响,才能充分认识这种技术对法治的影响。在这样做的过程中,重要的是要认识到并考虑到并非所有的国家都是一样的,有必要考虑到国家之间的差异。此外,这些主题通常是从发达国家和工业化国家的角度来讨论的,这些国家是此类技术开发和部署最广泛的国家。但第四次工业革命的影响并不局限于发达国家,发展中国家的社区也在不断接触这种技术,尤其是社交媒体,即使这种技术和平台是在其他地方开发的。本文试图将讨论置于东南亚发展中国家的背景下,以证明发展技术相关机构的必要性。在这样做的过程中,正在建立与其社区相关的有效机构的后殖民发展中国家过去的经验在这一进程中将是非常宝贵的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System Understanding the Role of Consent in Data Protection Regime: How Indonesia Can Learn From the GDPR Simple, Speedy, and Low Cost Trial : A Panacea For Corruption in Indonesia? THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EARTH OBSERVATION DATA IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: A CLOSER LOOK TOWARDS DATA IMAGING CRIMINISTRATIVE LAW: DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1