Supporting interviews with technology: how software integration can benefit participants and interviewers

IF 2.1 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Contemporary Social Science Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1080/21582041.2022.2153158
Monique F. Harrison, Philip A. Hernandez
{"title":"Supporting interviews with technology: how software integration can benefit participants and interviewers","authors":"Monique F. Harrison, Philip A. Hernandez","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2022.2153158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The interview experience is only one component of the process of interviewing – software programmes can coordinate the pre-interview steps and begin a digitally-mediated relationship with participants long before the actual interview commences. This essay provides examples of how researchers can maximise their time and energy by digitally coordinating the steps of the interview process, thus reducing the logistical time and stress for all involved. Smoothly tying together the user experience from the first click of interest, to consent, to scheduling, and finally payment, confers many advantages to both the interviewer and interviewee. Based on a study with over 700 online interviews conducted from 2019 to 2022, this article gives insight into the platforms and customisation options that allowed a relatively small research team to conduct a large qualitative study. The automation of portions of the typical process allowed us to spend more of our time and intellectual resources on the interviews and initial analysis rather than logistics. We discuss the process of digital consent, interview scheduling using calendar managers, and standardised communication coordination. We describe the participant experience, give detailed descriptions of how we integrated the software associated with interviews, and provide our insights on the process. This article is a timely guide for qualitative researchers to lessen their load by coordinating the logistics of interviewing more efficiently.","PeriodicalId":46484,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Social Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"517 - 527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2022.2153158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The interview experience is only one component of the process of interviewing – software programmes can coordinate the pre-interview steps and begin a digitally-mediated relationship with participants long before the actual interview commences. This essay provides examples of how researchers can maximise their time and energy by digitally coordinating the steps of the interview process, thus reducing the logistical time and stress for all involved. Smoothly tying together the user experience from the first click of interest, to consent, to scheduling, and finally payment, confers many advantages to both the interviewer and interviewee. Based on a study with over 700 online interviews conducted from 2019 to 2022, this article gives insight into the platforms and customisation options that allowed a relatively small research team to conduct a large qualitative study. The automation of portions of the typical process allowed us to spend more of our time and intellectual resources on the interviews and initial analysis rather than logistics. We discuss the process of digital consent, interview scheduling using calendar managers, and standardised communication coordination. We describe the participant experience, give detailed descriptions of how we integrated the software associated with interviews, and provide our insights on the process. This article is a timely guide for qualitative researchers to lessen their load by coordinating the logistics of interviewing more efficiently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用技术支持面试:软件集成如何使参与者和面试官受益
摘要面试体验只是面试过程的一个组成部分——软件程序可以协调面试前的步骤,并在实际面试开始之前很久就开始与参与者建立数字中介关系。这篇文章提供了一些例子,说明研究人员如何通过数字协调面试过程的各个步骤来最大限度地利用时间和精力,从而减少所有参与者的后勤时间和压力。从第一次点击感兴趣到同意,再到日程安排,最后是付款,将用户体验平滑地结合在一起,为面试官和被面试者带来了许多优势。基于2019年至2022年对700多个在线访谈的研究,本文深入了解了允许相对较小的研究团队进行大规模定性研究的平台和定制选项。典型流程部分的自动化使我们能够将更多的时间和智力资源花在面试和初步分析上,而不是物流上。我们讨论了数字同意的过程、使用日历管理器的面试安排以及标准化的沟通协调。我们描述了参与者的体验,详细描述了我们如何集成与面试相关的软件,并提供了我们对面试过程的见解。这篇文章为定性研究人员提供了及时的指导,通过更有效地协调面试的后勤工作来减轻他们的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Reinventing public transport: rising to the transition challenge Winds from the East: ignored ancient Asian views on international trade and traders A ‘just transition’ for workers in the automotive sector? Survey evidence from the West Midlands Enabling a just transition Exploring opportunities for public sector organisations to connect wellbeing to resource loops in a regional circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1