{"title":"[News from the Grand Hotel Abyss. The paradigm shift from cosmopolitanism to cosmo-politics].","authors":"Claus Leggewie","doi":"10.1007/s12286-021-00479-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The time-honored, always contested and slightly graying tradition of cosmopolitanism faces (I) three new challenges: (a) postcolonial, insofar as the Western origins of universal ideas are obvious and narrowing and one-sidedness may follow from this, (b) as an elite project that has never reached or ignores the broad population, coupled (c) with objections from the communitarian side that all notions of belonging, solidarity, and hospitality must be grounded in local communities. The idea of cosmopolitanism can face these challenges if it is (II) more implemented and operationalized: Approaches to \"global constitutionalism\" that reach beyond the nation-state as an outdated support for government and collective identity and address problem situations that have broken this framework of sovereignty and identity contribute to this. In the age of the Anthropocene (III), an extension of cosmopolitanism is appropriate, namely the overdue inclusion of animate and inanimate nature as a virtual co-actor of international relations. This conceptual and operational revision of cosmopolitan ideas results in overarching planetary \"cosmo-politics.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":44200,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","volume":"15 1","pages":"119-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8050820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00479-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The time-honored, always contested and slightly graying tradition of cosmopolitanism faces (I) three new challenges: (a) postcolonial, insofar as the Western origins of universal ideas are obvious and narrowing and one-sidedness may follow from this, (b) as an elite project that has never reached or ignores the broad population, coupled (c) with objections from the communitarian side that all notions of belonging, solidarity, and hospitality must be grounded in local communities. The idea of cosmopolitanism can face these challenges if it is (II) more implemented and operationalized: Approaches to "global constitutionalism" that reach beyond the nation-state as an outdated support for government and collective identity and address problem situations that have broken this framework of sovereignty and identity contribute to this. In the age of the Anthropocene (III), an extension of cosmopolitanism is appropriate, namely the overdue inclusion of animate and inanimate nature as a virtual co-actor of international relations. This conceptual and operational revision of cosmopolitan ideas results in overarching planetary "cosmo-politics."
期刊介绍:
Comparative Governance and Politics – Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (ZfVP) was founded in 2007. It is an internationally renowned journal that adheres to the highest standards of quality (double-blind peer review). The journal is published quarterly, and it is the first bilingual (German and English) journal that focuses on innovative research results in the area of comparative politics.
The journal is a central academic forum for outstanding research achievements in the field of comparative politics, and covers the entire range of comparative research within the field. The journal publishes conceptual, methodological, and empirical studies from all the various research areas within the discipline of political science.
Special Issues and Special Sections
Special Issues and Special Sections offer the opportunity to present focal topics of comparative research. All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review procedure, which is conducted within the scope of a consultation between the author and the editors through our online submission system.
The editors will also initiate the creation of potential special issues through open calls for papers. At the same time, the editors always appreciate suggestions and initiatives from the comparative studies community. Proposals for Special Issues and Special Sections are also subjected to an internal evaluation process. Our Special Issues are published as one of the four quarterly issues and usually consist of six to ten articles, accompanied by an introduction written by the guest editor(s). Special Sections, on the other hand, are a topical focus in one of the four quarterly issues, consisting of three to five articles, which are supplemented by a guest editor’s preface.