[News from the Grand Hotel Abyss. The paradigm shift from cosmopolitanism to cosmo-politics].

IF 0.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s12286-021-00479-4
Claus Leggewie
{"title":"[News from the Grand Hotel Abyss. The paradigm shift from cosmopolitanism to cosmo-politics].","authors":"Claus Leggewie","doi":"10.1007/s12286-021-00479-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The time-honored, always contested and slightly graying tradition of cosmopolitanism faces (I) three new challenges: (a) postcolonial, insofar as the Western origins of universal ideas are obvious and narrowing and one-sidedness may follow from this, (b) as an elite project that has never reached or ignores the broad population, coupled (c) with objections from the communitarian side that all notions of belonging, solidarity, and hospitality must be grounded in local communities. The idea of cosmopolitanism can face these challenges if it is (II) more implemented and operationalized: Approaches to \"global constitutionalism\" that reach beyond the nation-state as an outdated support for government and collective identity and address problem situations that have broken this framework of sovereignty and identity contribute to this. In the age of the Anthropocene (III), an extension of cosmopolitanism is appropriate, namely the overdue inclusion of animate and inanimate nature as a virtual co-actor of international relations. This conceptual and operational revision of cosmopolitan ideas results in overarching planetary \"cosmo-politics.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":44200,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","volume":"15 1","pages":"119-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8050820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00479-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The time-honored, always contested and slightly graying tradition of cosmopolitanism faces (I) three new challenges: (a) postcolonial, insofar as the Western origins of universal ideas are obvious and narrowing and one-sidedness may follow from this, (b) as an elite project that has never reached or ignores the broad population, coupled (c) with objections from the communitarian side that all notions of belonging, solidarity, and hospitality must be grounded in local communities. The idea of cosmopolitanism can face these challenges if it is (II) more implemented and operationalized: Approaches to "global constitutionalism" that reach beyond the nation-state as an outdated support for government and collective identity and address problem situations that have broken this framework of sovereignty and identity contribute to this. In the age of the Anthropocene (III), an extension of cosmopolitanism is appropriate, namely the overdue inclusion of animate and inanimate nature as a virtual co-actor of international relations. This conceptual and operational revision of cosmopolitan ideas results in overarching planetary "cosmo-politics."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abgrund大酒店的新闻。从世界主义到世界主义的范式转换
世界主义这一历史悠久、总是受到争议、略显灰白的传统面临着(1)三个新的挑战:(a)后殖民主义,因为普世思想的西方起源是明显的、狭隘的,因此可能会产生片面;(b)作为一个从未触及或忽视广大人口的精英项目;(c)来自社群主义方面的反对,即所有归属感、团结和热情好客的概念都必须以当地社区为基础。如果世界主义思想(II)得到更多的实施和操作,它就会面临这些挑战:“全球宪政”的方法超越了民族国家,作为对政府和集体认同的过时支持,并解决了打破主权和认同框架的问题情况,有助于实现这一目标。在人类世(III)时代,世界主义的延伸是适当的,即将有生命和无生命的自然作为国际关系的虚拟共同行动者纳入其中。这种对世界主义思想的概念和操作上的修正导致了包罗万象的“世界政治”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Comparative Governance and Politics – Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (ZfVP) was founded in 2007. It is an internationally renowned journal that adheres to the highest standards of quality (double-blind peer review). The journal is published quarterly, and it is the first bilingual (German and English) journal that focuses on innovative research results in the area of comparative politics. The journal is a central academic forum for outstanding research achievements in the field of comparative politics, and covers the entire range of comparative research within the field. The journal publishes conceptual, methodological, and empirical studies from all the various research areas within the discipline of political science. Special Issues and Special Sections Special Issues and Special Sections offer the opportunity to present focal topics of comparative research. All submissions undergo a double-blind peer review procedure, which is conducted within the scope of a consultation between the author and the editors through our online submission system. The editors will also initiate the creation of potential special issues through open calls for papers. At the same time, the editors always appreciate suggestions and initiatives from the comparative studies community. Proposals for Special Issues and Special Sections are also subjected to an internal evaluation process. Our Special Issues are published as one of the four quarterly issues and usually consist of six to ten articles, accompanied by an introduction written by the guest editor(s). Special Sections, on the other hand, are a topical focus in one of the four quarterly issues, consisting of three to five articles, which are supplemented by a guest editor’s preface.
期刊最新文献
Polarization and rule of law crisis-insights from Poland. Managing courts in competitive authoritarian regimes: Co-optation, repression and resistance in Hungary. Student-led replication studies in comparative politics: new findings by fresh eyes? Karlo Basta. 2021. The Symbolic State. Minority Recognition, Majority Backlash, and Secession in Multinational Countries. The majority-runoff as integral element of a parallel electoral system. Results of simulations with regard to the German federal elections in 2017 and 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1