An observational study on the effect of individualised homoeopathic medicine administered based on totality of symptoms vis-à-vis personality in cases of osteoarthritis knee

NHarihara Iyer, NRajeev Kumar
{"title":"An observational study on the effect of individualised homoeopathic medicine administered based on totality of symptoms vis-à-vis personality in cases of osteoarthritis knee","authors":"NHarihara Iyer, NRajeev Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ijrh.ijrh_86_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Individualisation is the process of arriving at the image of the patient for the selection of remedy. The customary way of individualisation of the patient is through the construction of totality of symptoms. The little explored area in Homoeopathy is individualisation solely based on personality characteristics. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of individualised homoeopathic medicine administered based on totality of symptoms vis-à-vis personality in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Methods: The observational study includes 60 clinically diagnosed cases of osteoarthritis knee, of which 30 cases were administered the homoeopathic medicine selected on the basis of totality of symptoms and thirty cases based on personality. Randomisation was done using computer-generated numbers. The personality of the patients was assessed through the 44-item Big-Five Inventory. A self-made tool, transcribing trait items to rubrics of the homoeopathic repertory, was prepared. The knee osteoarthritis scores on physical function, pain and patient global estimate in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) sheet, before and after treatment, were compared. Results: The paired difference mean of RAPID3 in totality of symptom-based administration was 4.06 and for personality-based administration was 1.92 with a standard deviation of 3.91 and 3.29, respectively. The test result is statistically significant at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Administration of individualised Homoeopathy medicine based on totality of symptoms is found to be more effective as compared to individualised Homoeopathy medicine based on personality amongst patients suffering from osteoarthritis knee.","PeriodicalId":13469,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijrh.ijrh_86_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Individualisation is the process of arriving at the image of the patient for the selection of remedy. The customary way of individualisation of the patient is through the construction of totality of symptoms. The little explored area in Homoeopathy is individualisation solely based on personality characteristics. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the effect of individualised homoeopathic medicine administered based on totality of symptoms vis-à-vis personality in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Methods: The observational study includes 60 clinically diagnosed cases of osteoarthritis knee, of which 30 cases were administered the homoeopathic medicine selected on the basis of totality of symptoms and thirty cases based on personality. Randomisation was done using computer-generated numbers. The personality of the patients was assessed through the 44-item Big-Five Inventory. A self-made tool, transcribing trait items to rubrics of the homoeopathic repertory, was prepared. The knee osteoarthritis scores on physical function, pain and patient global estimate in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) sheet, before and after treatment, were compared. Results: The paired difference mean of RAPID3 in totality of symptom-based administration was 4.06 and for personality-based administration was 1.92 with a standard deviation of 3.91 and 3.29, respectively. The test result is statistically significant at 0.05 level (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Administration of individualised Homoeopathy medicine based on totality of symptoms is found to be more effective as compared to individualised Homoeopathy medicine based on personality amongst patients suffering from osteoarthritis knee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项观察性研究,针对骨性膝关节炎患者,基于总体症状与-à-vis人格的个体化顺势疗法药物治疗效果
背景:个体化是到达患者的形象,以选择补救措施的过程。病人个体化的习惯方法是通过构建症状的整体。顺势疗法中很少被探索的领域是完全基于人格特征的个体化。目的:本研究的目的是比较基于整体症状与-à-vis人格的个体化顺势疗法药物对膝骨关节炎患者的疗效。方法:对60例临床诊断为膝骨性关节炎的患者进行观察性研究,其中30例根据症状总体选择顺势疗法药物,30例根据患者个性选择顺势疗法药物。随机化使用计算机生成的数字。通过44项大五人格量表对患者进行人格评估。自制工具,将特质项目转录到顺势疗法资料库的标题中。比较治疗前后膝关节骨性关节炎患者生理功能评分、疼痛评分和患者总体评分(RAPID3)。结果:RAPID3在以症状为基础给药总体上的配对差异均值为4.06,在以人格为基础给药总体上的配对差异均值为1.92,标准差分别为3.91和3.29。检验结果在0.05水平上有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与基于个性的个体化顺势疗法药物相比,基于整体症状的个体化顺势疗法药物治疗对膝骨关节炎患者更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy
Indian Journal of Research in Homoeopathy Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety of potentised dilutions of Rhus toxicodendron in Wistar albino rats Obstinate chronic venous ulcer treated with the homoeopathic medicine Silicea: A case report 269 years of Homoeopathy: The healing continues Homoeopathic treatment of a child with internet gaming disorder and atopic dermatitis: A case report Tinea cruris managed with a single dose of individualised homoeopathic medicine: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1