Vagaries and challenges confronting police accountability in the South African post-colony as revealed by recent Commissions of Inquiry

E. van der Spuy
{"title":"Vagaries and challenges confronting police accountability in the South African post-colony as revealed by recent Commissions of Inquiry","authors":"E. van der Spuy","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2021.1916971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper takes inspiration from David Bayley’s recognition that Commissions of Inquiry yield useful archival material for investigating the challenges for police accountability. Guided by his spirit of inquiry, this paper presents three recent Commissions of Inquiry in South Africa (the Khayelitsha Commission of Inquiry and the Inquiry into the events at Marikana; and the yet to be completed Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture) and considers how each have shed light on the organisational woes and policy conundrums confronting the police and policing in South Africa. In turn, these Commissions have yielded spaces for (re-)engaging issues relating to the structure, function and governance of the police. In doing so, the deliberations of these Commissions have in interesting ways interfaced with concerns raised in both public debates and scholarly analysis.","PeriodicalId":45887,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01924036.2021.1916971","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2021.1916971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper takes inspiration from David Bayley’s recognition that Commissions of Inquiry yield useful archival material for investigating the challenges for police accountability. Guided by his spirit of inquiry, this paper presents three recent Commissions of Inquiry in South Africa (the Khayelitsha Commission of Inquiry and the Inquiry into the events at Marikana; and the yet to be completed Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture) and considers how each have shed light on the organisational woes and policy conundrums confronting the police and policing in South Africa. In turn, these Commissions have yielded spaces for (re-)engaging issues relating to the structure, function and governance of the police. In doing so, the deliberations of these Commissions have in interesting ways interfaced with concerns raised in both public debates and scholarly analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近的调查委员会揭示了南非后殖民时期警察问责所面临的种种变化和挑战
摘要本文的灵感来源于David Bayley的认识,即调查委员会为调查警察问责制的挑战提供了有用的档案材料。在他的探究精神的指引下,本文介绍了南非最近的三个调查委员会(Khayelitsha调查委员会和Marikana事件调查委员会;以及尚未完成的Zondo国家抓捕调查委员会),并考虑了每一个委员会如何揭示南非警察和治安面临的组织困境和政策难题。反过来,这些委员会为(重新)参与与警察的结构、职能和治理有关的问题提供了空间。在这样做的过程中,这些委员会的审议以有趣的方式与公众辩论和学术分析中提出的关切相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
“Spirit child” and concomitant paedicides in Africa: a systematic review of the empirical literature Exploring public cooperation with police: the role of police accountability, police effectiveness, and public trust Examining gang membership and victimisation as predictors of gun violence perpetration: testing for interactive effects A review of restorative justice programmes for First Nations Peoples in Queensland Citizens’ sex offence myths and perceived effectiveness of sex offender community notification in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1