A perfect match or an arranged marriage? How chief digital officers and chief information officers perceive their relationship: a dyadic research design

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS European Journal of Information Systems Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2023.2178742
Felix Lorenz, Arne Buchwald
{"title":"A perfect match or an arranged marriage? How chief digital officers and chief information officers perceive their relationship: a dyadic research design","authors":"Felix Lorenz, Arne Buchwald","doi":"10.1080/0960085X.2023.2178742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Several organisations have introduced a new leadership role, the Chief Digital Officer (CDO), as a centralised role in their top management team (TMT), tasked with accelerating and coordinating their digital transformation. While previous research proposes a complementary, tight alignment between the CDO and the Chief Information Officer (CIO), role redundancies and the fight for recognition and resources also suggest an inherent tension. We provide insights into the CIO-CDO collaboration quality based on role, TMT cooperation, conflict theory, and a dyadic design approach of 11 CIO-CDO relationships with 33 expert interviews in two waves. Our findings indicate that the CIO-CDO relationship may not always be as complementary as proposed in the literature; instead, in the vast majority of our dyads, there is too much role conflict to achieve tight alignment, leading to separation behaviour between the roles. We identify the involvement in the introduction of the other role, the CIO demand-side orientation, and the CDO supply-side orientation as important contingency factors determining the quality of the CIO-CDO relationship. Finally, unless the CIO-CDO relationship resembles a perfect match, a unified Chief Digital and Information Officer (CDIO) role may better resolve the challenges we identify in our sample’s dyads. Our insights extend the understanding of the CIO-CDO relationship.","PeriodicalId":50486,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Information Systems","volume":"32 1","pages":"372 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2023.2178742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several organisations have introduced a new leadership role, the Chief Digital Officer (CDO), as a centralised role in their top management team (TMT), tasked with accelerating and coordinating their digital transformation. While previous research proposes a complementary, tight alignment between the CDO and the Chief Information Officer (CIO), role redundancies and the fight for recognition and resources also suggest an inherent tension. We provide insights into the CIO-CDO collaboration quality based on role, TMT cooperation, conflict theory, and a dyadic design approach of 11 CIO-CDO relationships with 33 expert interviews in two waves. Our findings indicate that the CIO-CDO relationship may not always be as complementary as proposed in the literature; instead, in the vast majority of our dyads, there is too much role conflict to achieve tight alignment, leading to separation behaviour between the roles. We identify the involvement in the introduction of the other role, the CIO demand-side orientation, and the CDO supply-side orientation as important contingency factors determining the quality of the CIO-CDO relationship. Finally, unless the CIO-CDO relationship resembles a perfect match, a unified Chief Digital and Information Officer (CDIO) role may better resolve the challenges we identify in our sample’s dyads. Our insights extend the understanding of the CIO-CDO relationship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天作之合还是包办婚姻?首席数字官和首席信息官如何看待他们的关系:二元研究设计
一些组织已经引入了一个新的领导角色——首席数字官(CDO),作为其最高管理团队(TMT)中的一个集中角色,其任务是加速和协调其数字化转型。虽然之前的研究表明,CDO和首席信息官(CIO)之间存在一种互补的紧密联系,但角色冗余以及对认可和资源的争夺也表明了一种内在的紧张关系。本文通过对33位专家的访谈,分两波对11位CIO-CDO的关系进行了二元设计,并基于角色、TMT合作、冲突理论对CIO-CDO的协作质量进行了深入分析。我们的研究结果表明,cio和cdo的关系可能并不总是像文献中提出的那样互补;相反,在我们的绝大多数二人组中,有太多的角色冲突,无法实现紧密的一致,导致角色之间的行为分离。我们将其他角色的引入、CIO的需求侧导向和CDO的供给侧导向视为决定CIO-CDO关系质量的重要偶然性因素。最后,除非cio和cdo的关系是完美匹配的,否则统一的首席数字和信息官(CDIO)角色可能会更好地解决我们在样本中发现的挑战。我们的见解扩展了对CIO-CDO关系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Information Systems
European Journal of Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Information Systems offers a unique European perspective on the theory and practice of information systems for a global readership. We actively seek first-rate articles that offer a critical examination of information technology, covering its effects, development, implementation, strategy, management, and policy.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling motivational configurations in shaping meaningful engagement in green gamification Determinants of gamification effectiveness: perspectives of technology affordances and coping responses in the context of team-based gamified training Examining the impact of mobile gambling harm minimisation features: a dualistic model of passion perspective Achieving strategic alignment between business and information technology with information technology governance: the role of commitment to principles and Top Leadership Support Reducing the incidence of biased algorithmic decisions through feature importance transparency: an empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1